ive got logic on PC.
and ableton v5.
i installed a plug in bundle into logic vst folder, as usual.
and ableton plug in options are sorted, ive jsut pointed
them to the logic vst folder. the plug ins work in ableton fine.
but this bundle ive installed, Logic wont boot up anymore.
so im gonna uninstall it.......and well, just wanna use it with
ableton.
how can i install the plug ins, into ableton?
and at the same time, use logic vst plug in folder for
all my other plug ins............?
basically i dont wanna install the new plug ins into
logic, as its clashing with logic startup.
so i wanna use ableton, with my logic vst plug in folder,
and i wanna use the new plug ins with ableton.
sigh.
thanks in advance.
and also.......direct X plug ins. they work in logic. but ableton does not
recognise them. is this normal??
ableton does not support direct X plug ins?? only VST variants?
(for windows XP)
how to install plug-ins (and related issues)
the logic vst folder is 3.5gb.panners wrote:direct X do not work with ableton and as for your vsts you could make a new VST folder anywhere you like and you could copy the contents of you logic vsts to the new folder that should work. then point ableton to that folder
can i make a new folder, and just put a shortcut to the logic vst folder in it?
and then install the new plug ins into the new folder (not in the logic folder)
mmm.....i could just copy and paste the logic VST folder into a new location, and put new plug ins in this, and use ableton on this folder.
are you sure i could just copy and paste files from logic vst folder into a new folder, and it would work on ableton (new folder)........?
cause when ive installed plug ins into logic in tha past , its been a proper installation process. (
some dll. files could probably be moved, but not all plug ins and vsts...........surely....
cause when ive installed plug ins into logic in tha past , its been a proper installation process. (
some dll. files could probably be moved, but not all plug ins and vsts...........surely....
right, yeah when i make a new folder, and just put a shortcut inside it, shortcut to logic vst folder.......it works in ableton(the new folder path) (so no need to create 2 copies of vst folder)
and i tried installing the plug in bundle into new vst folder (ableton one), the plug ins work in ableton........but logic still dont work, logic wont even boot up.........even tho when i install the plug ins, i dont install into logic vst folder......
the plug in manufacturers folder, in program files, gets files installed into it, even tho i create a diff location on another drive, for the installation. so i think logic is clashing with this......
the plug in bundle doesnt allow install into ableton exclusively.....i think.
logic only works when i un-install the plug in bundle, and do a system restore to when i didnt install them.
and i tried installing the plug in bundle into new vst folder (ableton one), the plug ins work in ableton........but logic still dont work, logic wont even boot up.........even tho when i install the plug ins, i dont install into logic vst folder......
the plug in manufacturers folder, in program files, gets files installed into it, even tho i create a diff location on another drive, for the installation. so i think logic is clashing with this......
the plug in bundle doesnt allow install into ableton exclusively.....i think.
logic only works when i un-install the plug in bundle, and do a system restore to when i didnt install them.
i already made a new folder and installed the bundle there, ableton works fine, logic wont boot up.StinkyPat wrote:Maybe this has already been done. Can you create a folder and install the bundle there? I think you can point Live to multiple locations for VSTs. Sorry, trying to work and have fun at the same time.
you can only point LIVE to ONE vst folder location.
installing the bundle into a new folder (for ableton) or into logic vst folder works both for ableton. ableton recognises the plug in........but logic wont even boot up.....
i think its the manufacturer of the plug ins program folder.....stuff gets installed there by default. and logic uses that folder cause logic uses diff older bundles from the same manufacturer.
im about to give up.
Obama would send 2 more brigades to Afghanistan
WASHINGTON (AP) — Democrat Barack Obama said Monday that as president he would send at least two more combat brigades to Afghanistan, where U.S. soldiers face rising violence and endured their deadliest attack in three years on Sunday.
The proposed force increase — about 7,000 troops — is part of Obama's plan to pull combat troops out of Iraq and focus on the growing threat from a resurgent al-Qaida in Afghanistan.
"As president, I would pursue a new strategy, and begin by providing at least two additional combat brigades to support our effort in Afghanistan," Obama said in an op-ed published Monday in The New York Times, a day before he plans a speech here on his vision for Iraq and Afghanistan.
"We need more troops, more helicopters, better intelligence-gathering and more nonmilitary assistance to accomplish the mission there," Obama said. "I would not hold our military, our resources and our foreign policy hostage to a misguided desire to maintain permanent bases in Iraq."
Obama's campaign said his speech will focus on how missteps in Iraq have hurt efforts to strengthen U.S. security. He will also discuss his plans for the new brigades in Afghanistan, call for Pakistan to step up efforts dealing with terrorists, discuss the need for diplomacy to address Iran's nuclear program and address other global challenges such as climate change and energy security.
Republican presidential candidate John McCain is planning to speak about his plan for Afghanistan Thursday. He told reporters Monday, "I think we need to do whatever is necessary and that could entail more troops."
U.S. commanders have said they need up to three more brigades in Afghanistan — or as many as 10,000 additional troops — to both train Afghan forces and battle the insurgency. President Bush and Defense Secretary Robert Gates have promised to beef up the U.S. force in Afghanistan next year, but military leaders have made it clear they won't be able to do that until they can reduce forces in Iraq.
Obama says he will do that, redeploying combat brigades out of Iraq by summer 2010. He wrote that he would leave in place a residual force of undetermined size behind to "perform limited missions" like going after remnants of al-Qaida and training Iraqi forces.
"Ending the war is essential to meeting our broader strategic goals, starting in Afghanistan and Pakistan, where the Taliban is resurgent and al-Qaida has a safe haven," Obama wrote. "Iraq is not the central front in the war on terrorism, and it never has been."
McCain took issue with that point. "He was wrong when he said we've lost the war, and he is wrong today when he says that Iraq is not the central battleground," the Arizona senator said. "We are winning there and his proposals would jeopardize the fragility of the success we've achieved. And his refusal to acknowledge that success is remarkable."
There are currently 36,000 U.S. forces in Afghanistan, including 17,500 serving with the NATO-led coalition and another 18,500 conducting training and counterinsurgency. The recent spike in U.S. troops there resulted largely from the overlap of one brigade moving into the country, as another is preparing to leave.
Violence is on the rise in Afghanistan. Monthly death tolls of U.S. and NATO troops in Afghanistan surpassed U.S. military deaths in Iraq in May and June, and a militant attack Sunday on a remote military outpost killed nine American soldiers, the deadliest assault on U.S. forces in Afghanistan in three years.
In his op-ed, Obama defended his opposition to President Bush's increase of troops in Iraq despite its success in helping bring down the violence in that country. He credited the increase for protecting Iraqis and weakening al-Qaida's effectiveness.
"But the same factors that led me to oppose the surge still hold true," Obama said. "The strain on our military has grown, the situation in Afghanistan has deteriorated and we've spent nearly $200 billion more in Iraq than we had budgeted. Iraq's leaders have failed to invest tens of billions of dollars in oil revenues in rebuilding their own country, and they have not reached the political accommodation that was the stated purpose of the surge."
McCain criticized Obama for his stance on the surge. "The major point here is that Senator Obama refuses to acknowledge that he was wrong," McCain said. "He said that the surge couldn't succeed. He said he opposed the increase in troops. The surge has succeeded."
WASHINGTON (AP) — Democrat Barack Obama said Monday that as president he would send at least two more combat brigades to Afghanistan, where U.S. soldiers face rising violence and endured their deadliest attack in three years on Sunday.
The proposed force increase — about 7,000 troops — is part of Obama's plan to pull combat troops out of Iraq and focus on the growing threat from a resurgent al-Qaida in Afghanistan.
"As president, I would pursue a new strategy, and begin by providing at least two additional combat brigades to support our effort in Afghanistan," Obama said in an op-ed published Monday in The New York Times, a day before he plans a speech here on his vision for Iraq and Afghanistan.
"We need more troops, more helicopters, better intelligence-gathering and more nonmilitary assistance to accomplish the mission there," Obama said. "I would not hold our military, our resources and our foreign policy hostage to a misguided desire to maintain permanent bases in Iraq."
Obama's campaign said his speech will focus on how missteps in Iraq have hurt efforts to strengthen U.S. security. He will also discuss his plans for the new brigades in Afghanistan, call for Pakistan to step up efforts dealing with terrorists, discuss the need for diplomacy to address Iran's nuclear program and address other global challenges such as climate change and energy security.
Republican presidential candidate John McCain is planning to speak about his plan for Afghanistan Thursday. He told reporters Monday, "I think we need to do whatever is necessary and that could entail more troops."
U.S. commanders have said they need up to three more brigades in Afghanistan — or as many as 10,000 additional troops — to both train Afghan forces and battle the insurgency. President Bush and Defense Secretary Robert Gates have promised to beef up the U.S. force in Afghanistan next year, but military leaders have made it clear they won't be able to do that until they can reduce forces in Iraq.
Obama says he will do that, redeploying combat brigades out of Iraq by summer 2010. He wrote that he would leave in place a residual force of undetermined size behind to "perform limited missions" like going after remnants of al-Qaida and training Iraqi forces.
"Ending the war is essential to meeting our broader strategic goals, starting in Afghanistan and Pakistan, where the Taliban is resurgent and al-Qaida has a safe haven," Obama wrote. "Iraq is not the central front in the war on terrorism, and it never has been."
McCain took issue with that point. "He was wrong when he said we've lost the war, and he is wrong today when he says that Iraq is not the central battleground," the Arizona senator said. "We are winning there and his proposals would jeopardize the fragility of the success we've achieved. And his refusal to acknowledge that success is remarkable."
There are currently 36,000 U.S. forces in Afghanistan, including 17,500 serving with the NATO-led coalition and another 18,500 conducting training and counterinsurgency. The recent spike in U.S. troops there resulted largely from the overlap of one brigade moving into the country, as another is preparing to leave.
Violence is on the rise in Afghanistan. Monthly death tolls of U.S. and NATO troops in Afghanistan surpassed U.S. military deaths in Iraq in May and June, and a militant attack Sunday on a remote military outpost killed nine American soldiers, the deadliest assault on U.S. forces in Afghanistan in three years.
In his op-ed, Obama defended his opposition to President Bush's increase of troops in Iraq despite its success in helping bring down the violence in that country. He credited the increase for protecting Iraqis and weakening al-Qaida's effectiveness.
"But the same factors that led me to oppose the surge still hold true," Obama said. "The strain on our military has grown, the situation in Afghanistan has deteriorated and we've spent nearly $200 billion more in Iraq than we had budgeted. Iraq's leaders have failed to invest tens of billions of dollars in oil revenues in rebuilding their own country, and they have not reached the political accommodation that was the stated purpose of the surge."
McCain criticized Obama for his stance on the surge. "The major point here is that Senator Obama refuses to acknowledge that he was wrong," McCain said. "He said that the surge couldn't succeed. He said he opposed the increase in troops. The surge has succeeded."
In my life
Why do I smile
At people who I'd much rather kick in the eye?
-Moz
Why do I smile
At people who I'd much rather kick in the eye?
-Moz
