Live 8 - any signs ?
-
- Posts: 8803
- Joined: Wed Mar 31, 2004 3:12 pm
- Location: www.fridge.net.au
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 2255
- Joined: Mon May 29, 2006 10:10 pm
+1adventurepants_ wrote:i just wish they would concentrate on the Live stuff and ditch the arrangement enhancements. To me tracking in Reaper is a million times easier than in Live.
but Live is fooking awesome for jamming and looping and running crazy fx racks, those to me are its strengths. If they made midi work properly, it could finally be the centre of a Live hardware jamming and control centre. It is a very fragile program, and is absolutely the pickiest when it comes to hardware configurations. Live is the only program I use that feels sluggish on a quad core. Reaper screams, even when running lots of plugins, and the interface is snappy. In a 3mb install file. Live cant compete with these programs for tracking and arranging, Im not sure why its bothering.
Live 8 = Native Looping, tight as hell midi timing, better library management, better control of ext hardware, and rewrite the sluggish graphics engine.
whos with me??
I had a dream last night that there was a new live 8 and that each feature would be revealed on week at a time. The first new feature to be revealed was a new set of guitar effects called "guitar amp". Needless to say I was very disappointed.
Logic Studio, Live 7, Max 5, Monome 64, and Desktop Evolver
-
- Posts: 397
- Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2006 12:14 am
- Location: Seattle
- Contact:
Sounds like a boring dream.. Start watching some zombie moviesJJarvis wrote:I had a dream last night that there was a new live 8 and that each feature would be revealed on week at a time. The first new feature to be revealed was a new set of guitar effects called "guitar amp". Needless to say I was very disappointed.

+1.5friend_kami wrote:+1adventurepants_ wrote:i just wish they would concentrate on the Live stuff and ditch the arrangement enhancements. To me tracking in Reaper is a million times easier than in Live.
but Live is fooking awesome for jamming and looping and running crazy fx racks, those to me are its strengths. If they made midi work properly, it could finally be the centre of a Live hardware jamming and control centre. It is a very fragile program, and is absolutely the pickiest when it comes to hardware configurations. Live is the only program I use that feels sluggish on a quad core. Reaper screams, even when running lots of plugins, and the interface is snappy. In a 3mb install file. Live cant compete with these programs for tracking and arranging, Im not sure why its bothering.
Live 8 = Native Looping, tight as hell midi timing, better library management, better control of ext hardware, and rewrite the sluggish graphics engine.
whos with me??
-
- Posts: 8803
- Joined: Wed Mar 31, 2004 3:12 pm
- Location: www.fridge.net.au
- Contact:
...which is October 30th. Interested to see that they have just removed the dates from the Banner heading on the home page though...sweetjesus wrote:i really doubt they will announce anything before their Buy Live and get Operator Free promo ends

So here's a possible scenario...:
October 08: Live 8 big announcement hits the news, generates fresh interest/attention
November 08: public beta testing phase
November/December 08: "Buy Live 7, get upgrade to Live 8 free" promotion. This would bring in the Xmas sales and stores could offload existing Live 7 stock.
January 09: Live 8 product release at NAMM 2009.
All of the above including Cycling '74 partnership product, bundles, etc.
Plausible...?
iMac Retina 4K 3.3Ghz i7, 16Gb RAM
Live Suite 9.7.1 + Reason 9.1 + Pianoteq 5 + Sibelius 8.5
Listen on Soundcloud
Live Suite 9.7.1 + Reason 9.1 + Pianoteq 5 + Sibelius 8.5
Listen on Soundcloud
-
- Posts: 2255
- Joined: Mon May 29, 2006 10:10 pm
-
- Posts: 6659
- Joined: Sun Nov 19, 2006 1:56 am
- Location: greater toronto area
Live has been pretty stable to me in L6 and 7. A lot of crashes on this and other programs is caused by hardware conflicts, drivers and all the other variables when it's possible to have about 6 trillion configurations on PC and even on a Mac these days since they started farting about with cheap FW chipsets and soundcards to economize like the PC big box builders you're not onto a sure fire thing stability wise.
I had 2 crashes in L7 in beta and only 1 crash when I basically totally overloaded my ageing laptop with a zillion tracks and plugins in Live 7. On restart it recovered the work and no probs with a few more track freezes and a step up in latency to ease the CPU load.
Ableton have already started down the DAW road, I don't think they should give that up either. I'm sorry, but I am a Live user who is not into Live performance or DJing, and want to retire Cubase. So while I'm all for extra 'cool' tools for live performance if it makes the original buyers of L1,2 and 3 happy, I also want things like crossfading audio tracks in arrangement, folder tracks and better dual monitor support etc.
But if L8 didn't materialize until 2010 I wouldn't care.
I had 2 crashes in L7 in beta and only 1 crash when I basically totally overloaded my ageing laptop with a zillion tracks and plugins in Live 7. On restart it recovered the work and no probs with a few more track freezes and a step up in latency to ease the CPU load.
Ableton have already started down the DAW road, I don't think they should give that up either. I'm sorry, but I am a Live user who is not into Live performance or DJing, and want to retire Cubase. So while I'm all for extra 'cool' tools for live performance if it makes the original buyers of L1,2 and 3 happy, I also want things like crossfading audio tracks in arrangement, folder tracks and better dual monitor support etc.
But if L8 didn't materialize until 2010 I wouldn't care.
http://soundcloud.com/umbriel-rising http://www.myspace.com/leedsquietmandemos Live 7.0.18 SUITE, Cubase 5.5.2], Soundforge 9, Dell XPS M1530, 2.2 Ghz C2D, 4GB, Vista Ult SP2, legit plugins a plenty, Alesis IO14.
I wish the opposite.adventurepants_ wrote:i just wish they would concentrate on the Live stuff and ditch the arrangement enhancements. To me tracking in Reaper is a million times easier than in Live.
Gig Rig - rMBP 2.3GHZ i7, 16GB RAM, 256GB SSD, OSX 10.13.x, Presonus FS, Live 10.x
Home Rig - i9 eight-core Hackintosh 32GB DDR4, 2nd Generation Scarlett 18i20, ADA8000, JoeMeek SixQ, Live 10.x
Home Rig - i9 eight-core Hackintosh 32GB DDR4, 2nd Generation Scarlett 18i20, ADA8000, JoeMeek SixQ, Live 10.x
Me toodysanfel wrote:I wish the opposite.adventurepants_ wrote:i just wish they would concentrate on the Live stuff and ditch the arrangement enhancements. To me tracking in Reaper is a million times easier than in Live.
Solution to this will be, 2 diif packages...
1 Ableton studio (with arrange and lott of other midi stuff and enhancements)
2 ableton live without arrangement and stuff.
Well dunno, maybe its a shitty idea

-
- Posts: 1773
- Joined: Tue May 29, 2007 3:05 am
its certainly not the first time its been suggested. i could see a day when they did this in a few years time. Live does suffer from a bit of dual personality at the moment. Im not sure why they decided to go head to head with Logic in the last release, but im sure they have market research and focus groups and so on.lola wrote:Me toodysanfel wrote:I wish the opposite.adventurepants_ wrote:i just wish they would concentrate on the Live stuff and ditch the arrangement enhancements. To me tracking in Reaper is a million times easier than in Live.
Solution to this will be, 2 diif packages...
1 Ableton studio (with arrange and lott of other midi stuff and enhancements)
2 ableton live without arrangement and stuff.
Well dunno, maybe its a shitty idea
i just think its a shame that they invented a brand new paradigm, the Live sequencer. then for the last couple of releases, they are diluting that by adding all these things that other DAWS have had for years, but not adding basics like Folder tracks etc. If they concentrated on nothing but Session View for the next release, I would pay them whatever they asked for it.
nathannn wrote:i will block everyone on this forum if i have to.
+1111leedsquietman wrote:Live has been pretty stable to me in L6 and 7. A lot of crashes on this and other programs is caused by hardware conflicts, drivers and all the other variables when it's possible to have about 6 trillion configurations on PC and even on a Mac these days since they started farting about with cheap FW chipsets and soundcards to economize like the PC big box builders you're not onto a sure fire thing stability wise.
I had 2 crashes in L7 in beta and only 1 crash when I basically totally overloaded my ageing laptop with a zillion tracks and plugins in Live 7. On restart it recovered the work and no probs with a few more track freezes and a step up in latency to ease the CPU load.
Ableton have already started down the DAW road, I don't think they should give that up either. I'm sorry, but I am a Live user who is not into Live performance or DJing, and want to retire Cubase. So while I'm all for extra 'cool' tools for live performance if it makes the original buyers of L1,2 and 3 happy, I also want things like crossfading audio tracks in arrangement, folder tracks and better dual monitor support etc.
But if L8 didn't materialize until 2010 I wouldn't care.
custom touchscreen control for ableton created by cycling74 : )
http://www.ableton.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=97756
can be the more usefull thing in the history of live : )
http://www.ableton.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=97756
can be the more usefull thing in the history of live : )