and how were they created?jonny72 wrote:They might not be open formats but there are open source encoder / decoders for AAC and Apple Lossless.
you cant think of any benefits of an open format?Not really sure what the benefits of an open format are, other than creating another useless codec which does nothing different to existing codecs.
ogg, flac and wavpack would be good.jonny72 wrote:You get the industry standard lossy (MP3) and lossless (WAV) codecs, plus AAC (which gives far better quality vs size than MP3) and Apple Lossless (which gives good compression ratios). What is it you need that this doesn't give you?
i would be interested to see your evidence of how an open source codec going out of development caused a major problem.Add on the fact that the Apple codecs won't suddenly disappear and / or go out of development - something that is a major problem with open source codecs.
i think you're just regurgitating some vague notion you got via the internet about problems with open source software in regards to applications. some types of software dont require continual maintenance, upgrades and modifications.
all a codec requires is either a spec or a reference implementation, preferably both. once those criteria are fulfilled then the matter of how and where the codec is used / re-implemented will decide its popularity.
you can look at any compression scheme to see how these things change over time : DEFLATE (aka zip), bzip2 etc.
all this crap is trying to stop blind fanboyism from encouraging developers to stop restricting what can be done with my data and where it can be used.All this crap is just blatant Apple bashing without any foundation.
GAFM ***