[OT] Who's next on Bushs' list?

claudek · Post by **claudek** » Sat Nov 06, 2004 5:36 pm

Iran? They have nice oil too..and troops are just next door..
go boys! But perhaps N. Korea sides with Iran for oil exchange..

http://www.cnn.com/2004/WORLD/meast/11/ ... index.html

spiderprod · Post by **spiderprod** » Sat Nov 06, 2004 8:35 pm

i think it will be canada

forge · Post by **forge** » Sat Nov 06, 2004 10:09 pm

spiderprod wrote:i think it will be canada

in Yahoo news yesterday it was saying how after the election the canadian immigration website got six times more traffic than usual

buzzcock · Post by **buzzcock** » Sat Nov 06, 2004 10:59 pm

Actually claudek, Iran doesn't have much in the way of oil, but it has the second largest natural gas reserve in the world. Makes you wonder why they're so desperate to develop their "peaceful" uranium enrichment program...[/quote]

forge · Post by **forge** » Sat Nov 06, 2004 11:48 pm

someone posted on here a while back something about a website called www.stratfor.com (strategic forecasts) and before the invasion they were saying it would happen and then listed further countries in the following 10 year plan that were next, but spoke about them more as part of a wider strategic picture to do with the 'new american century' - (in other language, Empire building.) They pointed out the strategic value of Iraq because of it's location as much as anything.

I seem to remember Stratfor were based in Texas and have links to the Bush administration somehow. The service they provide is 'strategic forecasts' on financial risks of world regions based on 'inside knowledge' of military campaigns.

I seem to recall seeing pakistan being pretty close to next on the list.

pepezabala · Post by **pepezabala** » Sun Nov 07, 2004 12:21 am

could be venezuela, probably they will call it "war on drugs".

forge · Post by **forge** » Sun Nov 07, 2004 1:21 am

pepezabala wrote:could be venezuela, probably they will call it "war on drugs".

I did audio visual recently for an oil industry AGM with lots of delegates from the big oil companies from round the world and they were actually saying venezuela is on it's way out. The big untapped supply they were all interested in was russia, largely because of how badly inefficiently it was handled under the soviets

I saw a program on TV recently about the Luxury property business in Moscow - they guy the crew were following around for the day was a moscovite estate agent and was saying that after the fall of communism nobody quite knew what the laws were any more and it had never been made clear and so they buy and sell their houses with mostly cash and pay tax only on the 'official' price which is usually about five times less. They bring the cash in briefcases in 3 or 4 meetings.

Basically he was saying the government after communism hadnt quite figured it out so they're losing billions.

So if they figure that one out and also tap vast quantities of oil they still have, sounds like the Russia of the future might be doing pretty well - wonder if they'll join the EU?? Betcha Dubbya wouldn't stand for that

mcconaghy · Post by **mcconaghy** » Sun Nov 07, 2004 1:22 am

pepezabala wrote:could be venezuela, probably they will call it "war on drugs".

Especially since Venezuela is one of the US's main oil suppliers, accounting for close to 30% of the US's yearly imports.

special ed · Post by **special ed** » Sun Nov 07, 2004 4:00 am

i think the u.s. is up there on his list. after all his administration orchestrated 911. not that anyone will accept that fact though.

forge · Post by **forge** » Sun Nov 07, 2004 5:10 am

special ed wrote:i think the u.s. is up there on his list. after all his administration orchestrated 911. not that anyone will accept that fact though.

come on - the hard facts: There was a Koran and a how to fly an airplane video in a car at oe of the arports and someone said passports of the hijackers were found in the wreckage.

Absolutely undeniable proof that those A-Rabs were behind the whole thing

I mean Dubbaya was talking to school children at the time - he's just an honest decent American doing hs job reading stories to primary school children.

Funny that osama mentioned that in the latest video..."We never thought the president would leave 50 000 people to perish' or to that effect....sounds awful lot like he was suggesting Bush was in on it.

I certainly wouldn't put it past him.

Emissary · Post by **Emissary** » Sun Nov 07, 2004 10:40 am

forge wrote:
special ed wrote:i think the u.s. is up there on his list. after all his administration orchestrated 911. not that anyone will accept that fact though.
come on - the hard facts: There was a Koran and a how to fly an airplane video in a car at oe of the arports and someone said passports of the hijackers were found in the wreckage.

Absolutely undeniable proof that those A-Rabs were behind the whole thing

I mean Dubbaya was talking to school children at the time - he's just an honest decent American doing hs job reading stories to primary school children.

Funny that osama mentioned that in the latest video..."We never thought the president would leave 50 000 people to perish' or to that effect....sounds awful lot like he was suggesting Bush was in on it.

I certainly wouldn't put it past him.

Hmmm that does sound a bit like an orgy of evidence though doesnt it! , the koran and a how to fly a plane book, when you put it like that then it does seem like there could just be a chance of a cover up who knows...I DONT!

jamief · Post by **jamief** » Sun Nov 07, 2004 1:18 pm

illumanti say no more
23 ways to skin a cat

A DJ · Post by **A DJ** » Sun Nov 07, 2004 2:08 pm

special ed wrote:i think the u.s. is up there on his list. after all his administration orchestrated 911. not that anyone will accept that fact though.

anyone seen the DVD "in plane site"

i dont know anymore what is the truth.....seen so many things heard so many stories.....

bah

special ed · Post by **special ed** » Sun Nov 07, 2004 5:32 pm

well put it this way, government wants control. people are easiest to control when they are in fear. when they are in fear, they are less likely to question authority, thus, enabling the government to tighten its grip. these people like bush and the people controling him have been studying governments for a long time, they know how to get the results they are looking for. they observed how hitler took advantage of the rieschtag bombing to get germany under his thumb. they orchestrated 911 to get the same result. downtown had been a no-fly zone everyday for years except on 911. there is no eveidence of a plane hitting the pentagon. obl and gwb are members of two close families. anyone who says that obl is cut off from his family, obviously dont know anything about arab culture, where family is very important. this administration is behind 911, i would bet my life on it.

A DJ · Post by **A DJ** » Sun Nov 07, 2004 9:15 pm

Hey Ed,

have u ever seen some films by Alex Jones.....

if u havent, try to get hold of them.

dont think u will feel better seeing them... tbh.

9/11 wasnt the only attack on the WTC,

and there is also something as Oklahoma City bombing

the evidence given in these movies is what i believe ,

but me being an outsider , its hard to verify some off the things he says.

like i said before, who speeks the truth...... i dunno anymore

evrybody has an agenda these days

http://www.infowars.com/

[OT] Who's next on Bushs' list?

[OT] Who's next on Bushs' list?

next on the list

Re: next on the list

Re: next on the list