metafactor wrote:elxicano wrote:metafactor wrote:
The Soviet Union is alive and well, even trying to gain ground in this country. It's now called, "The United Socialist Republic of Barak Obama". Coming soon to devastate a wallet near you.
So says the desperate and ignorant republican.
Don't be so ignorant to assume so. As a tax paying, property owning citizen, I just happen to care and think enough not to put my vote toward someone who has no record to back his claims. The only record I can find is voting to raise taxes on those who make at least $42k a year (the middle class) and endorsing wasteful spending while in senate. Do your research. Nobody in their right mind would vote for someone on the basis of mere words and charisma, especially when it contradicts their own record. You can argue with me all you want, but the proof is in the record or lack thereof.
Buddy, trust me, I'm not the ignorant one in this conversation, but by all means keep talking...
Do you really think that you're the only tax paying and property owning citizen? Even Wesley Snipes eventually had to pay his taxes, so please leave this out of the discussion because it makes you look like an ass.
Yes McCain is known for voting to cut taxes, but the result was one of the largest deficits at its time. There are such things as fiscal responsibility, and his voting history has proven what he himself has admitted, that he doesn't know much about economics.
McCain does have long track record which includes many reasons not to vote for him. You're right the proof is in the record.
Then you talk about appealing to voters with lack of substance... umm, can you say Palin? Maybe you forget about her the way many of us wish we could, but that's more than enough reason not to vote for their ticket.
I've met and talked with McCain and he is a very charismatic individual... something that does not come across well in television, and while I think he is a decent person one-on-one, I still would not vote for him because of what he stands for, as indicated by his record, his party platform, and his many "off-color" remarks.
I know it must be nice to try and assume that we've all just fallen in love with Obama's charisma and appeal, the way the republican base has done for Palin, but if you actually took a chance to speak to his supporters, you'll find that's not the case. It's just not the same situation as the $150,000.00 spent to make her look appealing to make up for her lack of substance.
Lastly... you still can't back up your socialism claim. If you try, please include how things would be so different since the creation of Income Tax. Also I'd like you to explain the financial bailouts under republican leadership and direction as apart of your explanation.
This whole socialism idea is simply a cheap scare tactic which you've ignorantly bought into. It's simply unfortunate that you fit so neatly into a stereotype of much of the republican voting base.
), i'd rather obama won, just to piss that kind of person off.
