what runs Live better PC or MAC?

Discuss music production with Ableton Live.
hoffman2k
Posts: 14718
Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2004 6:40 pm
Location: Belgium
Contact:

Post by hoffman2k » Wed Nov 24, 2004 12:37 pm

yeah. i bet you cant wait till you get your hands on the dumbed down version of osx.

toneroll
Posts: 202
Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2004 11:59 pm
Location: florida.

Post by toneroll » Wed Nov 24, 2004 12:57 pm

couldnt give a toss mate... i dont care much for "dock bars" and "library" directories... blah blah , i like windows . i strip it down to nothing all o better to make music with
there used to be a well cheesy "sig." here

bencodec
Posts: 330
Joined: Fri Jun 11, 2004 5:14 pm
Location: Brooklyn

Post by bencodec » Wed Nov 24, 2004 3:23 pm

AdamJay wrote:i agree with Drush,
the reason i own the computer that i own is because of Live.
Live is my OS, Application, Hardware, and Software. everything i do musically anymore is centered around Live.
I can understand your situation, and maybe if i was only using live then i'd consider a PC (though personally i would love to see a linux version of live, then you'd really see those AMD chips perform)

However i don't ONLY use live and I'm sure like many others, i can't imagine being able to make the music i'm interested in using only live. without tools like supercollider, metasynth, GRM tools, max/msp, soundhack, and audiosculpt i'd find it very hard to make the noises i'm interested in and i'd still be stuck waiting for someone to write a VSTi that did what i want.

Live's a great tool and it's certainly a big part of the way i put my music together, but it's not the sole source of my sounds.

so in those situations personally i'm very very glad i have my powerbook.

noisetonepause
Posts: 4938
Joined: Sat Dec 28, 2002 3:38 pm
Location: Sticks and stones

Post by noisetonepause » Wed Nov 24, 2004 11:26 pm

toneroll wrote:couldnt give a toss mate... i dont care much for "dock bars" and "library" directories... blah blah , i like windows . i strip it down to nothing all o better to make music with
You use your computer only for music?

I don't - MP3 library, word processing + layout, note keeping, building web sites, Ruby programming, web surfing, e-mail, IM, images, and tonnes of other stuff - and I *need* Unix...

-Paws

drush
Posts: 1282
Joined: Tue Jul 29, 2003 4:40 am
Location: Venice, CA
Contact:

Post by drush » Wed Nov 24, 2004 11:40 pm

reason right there to have more than 1 computer :)

toneroll
Posts: 202
Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2004 11:59 pm
Location: florida.

Post by toneroll » Thu Nov 25, 2004 12:27 am

noisetonepause wrote:
toneroll wrote:couldnt give a toss mate... i dont care much for "dock bars" and "library" directories... blah blah , i like windows . i strip it down to nothing all o better to make music with
You use your computer only for music?

I don't - MP3 library, word processing + layout, note keeping, building web sites, Ruby programming, web surfing, e-mail, IM, images, and tonnes of other stuff - and I *need* Unix...

-Paws
no course i use it for all that stuff , well ,word processin note keeping , one day web sites, games , putting songs on my AHEM ipod ... haha..-- but ive got partions . for music making, its audio only aps, theres nothing else installed there.. the one i am on now has got everything else, and all the above stuff is done in third party stuff anyways the OS is really irrelavent to me.. (but it is good that live runs really well on it.) the job always gets done. you trying to say you can somehow do it easier on "panther" or "tiger" haha :roll:

EDIT.... does anyone even remember the topic for F£$"'s sake...
there used to be a well cheesy "sig." here

noisetonepause
Posts: 4938
Joined: Sat Dec 28, 2002 3:38 pm
Location: Sticks and stones

Post by noisetonepause » Thu Nov 25, 2004 10:31 am

drush wrote:reason right there to have more than 1 computer :)
Why? When one can do it all? Besides, I don't want to be lugging around three laptops so that when I go to a lecture I pull out one and when I want to make a beat on the train I have to take out another - defeats the purpose, don't it?

And MacOSX doesn't give a rat's backside if you have a million and three image processing apps installed next to Live... another reason to love it.
you trying to say you can somehow do it easier on "panther" or "tiger" haha
Yes I'd say it's a superior operating system... but I doubt you (one) would know without trying it.

-Paws

toneroll
Posts: 202
Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2004 11:59 pm
Location: florida.

Post by toneroll » Thu Nov 25, 2004 11:09 am

ive messed about on it, in a museum near me, and my sister used to work for a website called ammo city and i spent the day there messing about on them... , cant see how i can email better on osx using my yahoo account tho..... or how illustrator might work bettr in osx or something.. (besides rendering times)

fair enough people have preferences when it comes to OS's..... i know that but

"does live run better on a pc or mac?"
there used to be a well cheesy "sig." here

Komplex
Posts: 861
Joined: Wed Jun 09, 2004 11:27 pm
Location: Melbourne
Contact:

Post by Komplex » Thu Nov 25, 2004 11:20 am

holy shit. 9 pages of discussion about this topic when the answer is a simple Live runs better on PC's























;)

2kilo
Posts: 113
Joined: Tue Jul 27, 2004 11:25 am
Location: London
Contact:

Post by 2kilo » Thu Nov 25, 2004 7:30 pm

@noisetonepause

Yeah I've seen some "nupower" upgrade stuff for my old Powerbook but its usually around £300 notes for only a G4 500.... Anyway with a new DVD drive costing £700 from Apple there's no point really, better off buying a new PC... Lazy but I don't really have the time to hunt for second hand stuff either...

£300 for only a G4 500 upgrade !!!*££**???
£150 for a new motherboard and current top spec P4 chip....

Post Reply