Windows 7

morerecords · Post by **morerecords** » Sat Mar 21, 2009 6:12 pm

What of it?

hijo de la pula · Post by **hijo de la pula** » Sat Mar 21, 2009 7:20 pm

Great!

leedsquietman · Post by **leedsquietman** » Sat Mar 21, 2009 8:15 pm

we'll know for sure about a month after it's been released and widely in use by the general public

morerecords · Post by **morerecords** » Sun Mar 22, 2009 2:13 pm

hmmm could be very exciting!

chris vine · Post by **chris vine** » Sun Mar 22, 2009 2:57 pm

Well I hope it isn't the same ultra bloat as Vista..........

nebulae · Post by **nebulae** » Sun Mar 22, 2009 4:08 pm

Every report suggests this is gonna be the next XP and it's gonna kick ass.

My issue is that I'm hoping everything runs well on the 64bit version, because the 3-4gb ram limit is getting old.

juanpablo1313 · Post by **juanpablo1313** » Sun Mar 22, 2009 7:26 pm

Yes, it runs better the 64 bit version than the x86, so no worries

just sit and wait the software developers to make the change.

And, it's very stable IMHO, I've using it with Live 7 and no problems. Like 1 and a half week now and no errors or any problems. Good. An it's just a BETA. (build 7057 here)

3dot... · Post by **3dot...** » Sun Mar 22, 2009 11:35 pm

used it for a month... I really liked the interface...but it wasn't vibing with the RME drivers...so back to XP...

loquat · Post by **loquat** » Mon Mar 23, 2009 2:14 am

juanpablo1313 wrote:And, it's very stable IMHO, I've using it with Live 7 and no problems. Like 1 and a half week now and no errors or any problems. Good. An it's just a BETA. (build 7057 here)

How does Live perform in Windows 7 compared to XP? Any major changes is CPU usage or latency?

Zygi · Post by **Zygi** » Mon Mar 23, 2009 10:45 am

yeaaaaaaaaaaah win 7...... hmmmm......

worked fine until something started freezing my laptop at startup. went back into vista.

Imaulle · Post by **Imaulle** » Mon Mar 23, 2009 2:45 pm

I've been running build 7057 for almost two weeks now. it's rock solid

mlekodukye · Post by **mlekodukye** » Fri Mar 27, 2009 9:48 pm

was running great on build 7000, cpu usage was exactly as in XP, but now, having it updated to 7057, the graphics went slow and jerky, meters lag, vst controls lag... i tried different video drivers, native ATI and the one from M$ [ati radeon HD2400 xt] with equal lack of success.. also the overall feeling of the system is kind of degraded if compared to build 7000. i'm afraid that the RTM version will be ballasted down even more to be a descent sucksessor to Vista...

Imaulle · Post by **Imaulle** » Fri Mar 27, 2009 11:02 pm

you need to be on 7.0.14 or later and you need to run Live in compatability mode for Vista

mlekodukye · Post by **mlekodukye** » Sun Mar 29, 2009 2:33 pm

Imaulle, man, but does that mean that we need to upgrade Abe everytime the OS build is updated?))

today, that 'windows 7' driver v.9.3 from ati started giving me BSODs!

in fact, i resolved the issue by rolling back the ati native driver to a previous version. [which is, funny enogh, is not targeted for win7, only for Vista]. now the graphics are as smooth as it was before.

sweetjesus · Post by **sweetjesus** » Sun Mar 29, 2009 9:04 pm

mlekodukye wrote:Imaulle, man, but does that mean that we need to upgrade Abe everytime the OS build is updated?))

today, that 'windows 7' driver v.9.3 from ati started giving me BSODs!

in fact, i resolved the issue by rolling back the ati native driver to a previous version. [which is, funny enogh, is not targeted for win7, only for Vista]. now the graphics are as smooth as it was before.

you should report this to microsoft.

Windows 7

Windows 7

Re: Windows 7

Re: Windows 7

Re: Windows 7

Re: Windows 7

Re: Windows 7

Re: Windows 7

Re: Windows 7

Re: Windows 7

Re: Windows 7

Re: Windows 7

Re: Windows 7

Re: Windows 7

Re: Windows 7

Re: Windows 7