BAN ANIMAL EXPERIMENTS IN EU - VOTE NOW !

Discuss music production with Ableton Live.
Android Bishop
Posts: 1051
Joined: Sun Apr 12, 2009 1:03 am

Re: BAN ANIMAL EXPERIMENTS IN EU - VOTE NOW !

Post by Android Bishop » Mon Apr 27, 2009 11:17 pm

LoopStationZebra wrote:

I'm right with you, Android, but you do get seriously pissed. I'm not sure if that really helps your position. I'm not judging, mind you. Just find it interesting.

What's your own ethical journey on this issue? How did you feel about it when you were getting your undergrad vs how you felt before school? You don't have to answer, of course, but I don't personally know anyone in the field and am curious.
I was a lot more "hippie" before I started. I even got into it because of my kooky spiritual nonsense beliefs. My parents told me to get to a real university or I would be kicked out, so I did it and joined the Environmental and Occupational health program. However, I believe the universe (or god or whatever) directs us to the best path in our lives via feelings of excitement and joy. I was in my class for about 10 minutes when I realized I couldnt give a shit, got up and and left and dropped all my classes. I was looking through the other bio majors and saw the classes for biotech and thought that one sounded the coolest because it involved a lot of chemistry, physics, and fun sounding courses like DNA recombinant techniques and neural biology. Good lord did I get an education. Ever since then I've been fascinated with it, we are HACKING LIFE. We are taking the creation and functioning of organisms and biochemistry into our own hands, and it is leading us into the dawn of a new era where the actual process of evolution has evolved itself to a new level where organisms intelligently alter and create new forms of biological processes. Biology is like any other form of technology, only it is far more advanced. To be able to harness it for our own purposes is going to lead to an explosion of new ways of doing things, like reverse engineering advanced alien tech. the things we are learning and doing these days is absolutely mind blowing and it saddens me that the general population has no clue what is going on and what's actually involved.

For instance, if I told you that we actually use lentiviruses like HIV routinely in the lab, you'd probably freak the fuck out. But you wouldn't understand how we are using the virus code to inject our own custom DNA into the DNA of another organism after removing the parts of the virus RNA that code for other viruses. There isnt any danger because the vector doesnt have the ability to replicate itself, but if the public got word that we use HIV to genetically modify animals that could later be used in agriculture they would throw a shit fit. I probably would have too, but I've been learning this and doing this after years of hard work to gain an understanding of how it actually works and now I'm excited to use it. Unfortunately, science is under attack from all directions and most of it is coming from people who dont know SHIT. That's the problem, in order to know shit, you have to put in a lot of time and effort to learn a LOT of stuff to get a fundamental grasp of how all this stuff fits together. I get upset that people have the unmitigated gall to throw baseless accusations and spout nonsense like "animal research never solved anything" when they dont know anything about what they are talking about and refuse to put in the same amount of effort to learn it that the scientists did. Its insulting to the amazing things brilliant people have accomplished through scientific research.

I see a lot of issue dodging in this thread. I say if you are against animal research, go back to school and learn everything there is to know about biology and biochemistry and biotechnology and animal research and all that so you have a grasp of the subject and are therefore in a position to find some sort of alternative. Otherwise its just a bunch of horseshit based upon worthless opinions grounded in a lack of knowledge of the subject at hand.
Last edited by Android Bishop on Mon Apr 27, 2009 11:22 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Tone Deft
Posts: 24152
Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 5:19 pm

Re: BAN ANIMAL EXPERIMENTS IN EU - VOTE NOW !

Post by Tone Deft » Mon Apr 27, 2009 11:18 pm

scott nathaniel wrote:
Tone Deft wrote: neither, you're acting cool, I just find that to be a laughable statement, you come off as a complete luddite that's afraid of science. as if you follow any research or have any knowledge on this topic other than the occasional fear story in the news.

[quotea fear of research... it's quite funny actually, with thinking like that we'd still be up in the trees.


I said I didn't have a lot of faith in, not afear of, reasearch. So your comment is a bit off target, but whatever.
OK.


research is good, for example you should research before arguing this stuff.

I haven't been arguing. I have been asking questions and Bishop's been giving me decent answers. So again, a bit unfair, but, again, whatever. And just because Bishop showed you his tits doesn't mean he's infuckinfallible.
no, and he's not even a professional yet, he's still in school. he's WAAAAY ahead of the rest of us in knowing this one particular topic.

what about the ethics of making sure our food and drugs are safe and healthy?
Rhetorical :?:
huh? using 'ethics' and 'safe' in the same sentence?
In my life
Why do I smile
At people who I'd much rather kick in the eye?
-Moz

stringtapper
Posts: 6321
Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2004 6:21 pm

Re: BAN ANIMAL EXPERIMENTS IN EU - VOTE NOW !

Post by stringtapper » Mon Apr 27, 2009 11:24 pm

Tone Deft wrote: :roll: omfg you just pop up to say that arguing is wrong.
Never said anything was wrong. That's what the right and left do.
Tone Deft wrote:it's not a matter of like or dislike it's a judgment on what's best for society, science and health.

f-ing weak
And of course you know "what's best" (just like the right-wingers do).
Unsound Designer

Tone Deft
Posts: 24152
Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 5:19 pm

Re: BAN ANIMAL EXPERIMENTS IN EU - VOTE NOW !

Post by Tone Deft » Mon Apr 27, 2009 11:26 pm

fail.
In my life
Why do I smile
At people who I'd much rather kick in the eye?
-Moz

scott nathaniel
Posts: 668
Joined: Sun Aug 03, 2008 6:52 pm

Re: BAN ANIMAL EXPERIMENTS IN EU - VOTE NOW !

Post by scott nathaniel » Mon Apr 27, 2009 11:27 pm

Tone Deft wrote:
scott nathaniel wrote:
Tone Deft wrote: neither, you're acting cool, I just find that to be a laughable statement, you come off as a complete luddite that's afraid of science. as if you follow any research or have any knowledge on this topic other than the occasional fear story in the news.

[quotea fear of research... it's quite funny actually, with thinking like that we'd still be up in the trees.


I said I didn't have a lot of faith in, not afear of, reasearch. So your comment is a bit off target, but whatever.
OK.


research is good, for example you should research before arguing this stuff.

I haven't been arguing. I have been asking questions and Bishop's been giving me decent answers. So again, a bit unfair, but, again, whatever. And just because Bishop showed you his tits doesn't mean he's infuckinfallible.
no, and he's not even a professional yet, he's still in school. he's WAAAAY ahead of the rest of us in knowing this one particular topic.

what about the ethics of making sure our food and drugs are safe and healthy?
Rhetorical :?:
huh? using 'ethics' and 'safe' in the same sentence?
That's why, if you read my posts, the non-farcical ones, that I haven't argued for a position. My point is not that ethics shouldn't be in the scientific framework, but that the methods used for scientific inquiry aren't the same as those used to determine what is ethical. So what, we leave ethics to the scientist because we might not know the complete ins and outs of a string on DNA. I disagree with that notion.Yes, food should be safe; the air should be clean; the waters should be clean; Should we test on animals, I don't know. But you're saying you have faith in all researchers, all activity conducted under the umbrella of science?

Tone Deft
Posts: 24152
Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 5:19 pm

Re: BAN ANIMAL EXPERIMENTS IN EU - VOTE NOW !

Post by Tone Deft » Mon Apr 27, 2009 11:31 pm

scott nathaniel wrote:That's why, if you read my posts, the non-farcical ones, that I haven't argued for a position.
agreed, some good Q&A lost in the noise.
My point is not that ethics shouldn't be in the scientific framework, but that the methods used for scientific inquiry aren't the same as those used to determine what is ethical. So what, we leave ethics to the scientist because we might not know the complete ins and outs of a string on DNA. I disagree with that notion.Yes, food should be safe; the air should be clean; the waters should be clean; Should we test on animals, I don't know. But you're saying you have faith in all researchers, all activity conducted under the umbrella of science?
and I JUST wrote, there's value to both sides of the argument. to make such a decision I'd want to hear from ALL sides.

I never sided with Bishop, I never wrote that the scientists should decide. let the scientists speak up on what they want and why, let PETA speak up on what they should and shouldn't do and why.

then throw that out the window and do what the lobbyists tell you to do. ;)
In my life
Why do I smile
At people who I'd much rather kick in the eye?
-Moz

Kodama
Posts: 1950
Joined: Mon Jun 28, 2004 3:07 am
Location: PDX

Re: BAN ANIMAL EXPERIMENTS IN EU - VOTE NOW !

Post by Kodama » Mon Apr 27, 2009 11:32 pm

A degree does not bestow a right over another person. There are many bio medical professionals who are opposed to animal testing.

The argument is winnable in terms of human safety, wasted money (donations, tax dollars, drug prices), scientific validity and, yes, ethics.

If our society does not devolve or destroy our own habitat, I personally believe that we will find ourselves away from animal testing.

Just a hunch, not faith or anything...

Image
GO VEGAN!!! - Macbook Air, Bass Station II, Some Korg shit, Live Suite, U-He, Audio Damage, Microtonic, Ohmicide, more soft stuffs, awesome controllers, euro rack modular synth,an awesome cat.

Kodama
Posts: 1950
Joined: Mon Jun 28, 2004 3:07 am
Location: PDX

Re: BAN ANIMAL EXPERIMENTS IN EU - VOTE NOW !

Post by Kodama » Mon Apr 27, 2009 11:34 pm

BTW- I have fuck all to do with peta, that's like saying every christian is a mormon.


:P
GO VEGAN!!! - Macbook Air, Bass Station II, Some Korg shit, Live Suite, U-He, Audio Damage, Microtonic, Ohmicide, more soft stuffs, awesome controllers, euro rack modular synth,an awesome cat.

stringtapper
Posts: 6321
Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2004 6:21 pm

Re: BAN ANIMAL EXPERIMENTS IN EU - VOTE NOW !

Post by stringtapper » Mon Apr 27, 2009 11:36 pm

Tone Deft wrote:fail.
Is it uncomfortable to know someone could find no worth in either side's opinions?
Unsound Designer

Kodama
Posts: 1950
Joined: Mon Jun 28, 2004 3:07 am
Location: PDX

Re: BAN ANIMAL EXPERIMENTS IN EU - VOTE NOW !

Post by Kodama » Mon Apr 27, 2009 11:38 pm

stringtapper wrote:
Tone Deft wrote:fail.
Is it uncomfortable to know someone could find no worth in either side's opinions?

You have a Lemur, STFU.
GO VEGAN!!! - Macbook Air, Bass Station II, Some Korg shit, Live Suite, U-He, Audio Damage, Microtonic, Ohmicide, more soft stuffs, awesome controllers, euro rack modular synth,an awesome cat.

scott nathaniel
Posts: 668
Joined: Sun Aug 03, 2008 6:52 pm

Re: BAN ANIMAL EXPERIMENTS IN EU - VOTE NOW !

Post by scott nathaniel » Mon Apr 27, 2009 11:39 pm

Tone Deft wrote:
scott nathaniel wrote:That's why, if you read my posts, the non-farcical ones, that I haven't argued for a position.
agreed, some good Q&A lost in the noise.
My point is not that ethics shouldn't be in the scientific framework, but that the methods used for scientific inquiry aren't the same as those used to determine what is ethical. So what, we leave ethics to the scientist because we might not know the complete ins and outs of a string on DNA. I disagree with that notion.Yes, food should be safe; the air should be clean; the waters should be clean; Should we test on animals, I don't know. But you're saying you have faith in all researchers, all activity conducted under the umbrella of science?
and I JUST wrote, there's value to both sides of the argument. to make such a decision I'd want to hear from ALL sides.

I never sided with Bishop, I never wrote that the scientists should decide. let the scientists speak up on what they want and why, let PETA speak up on what they should and shouldn't do and why.

then throw that out the window and do what the lobbyists tell you to do. ;)
:lol:
Yeah, I doubt the powers that be will be visiting Ableton Forum anytime soon. And to think all of this insightful (incite-ful) :wink: dribble they'll be missing

Kodama
Posts: 1950
Joined: Mon Jun 28, 2004 3:07 am
Location: PDX

Re: BAN ANIMAL EXPERIMENTS IN EU - VOTE NOW !

Post by Kodama » Mon Apr 27, 2009 11:42 pm

Kodama wrote:
stringtapper wrote:
Tone Deft wrote:fail.
Is it uncomfortable to know someone could find no worth in either side's opinions?

You have a Lemur, STFU.

One day I will get an Octopus (both kinds!), then I will win this debate...
GO VEGAN!!! - Macbook Air, Bass Station II, Some Korg shit, Live Suite, U-He, Audio Damage, Microtonic, Ohmicide, more soft stuffs, awesome controllers, euro rack modular synth,an awesome cat.

scott nathaniel
Posts: 668
Joined: Sun Aug 03, 2008 6:52 pm

Re: BAN ANIMAL EXPERIMENTS IN EU - VOTE NOW !

Post by scott nathaniel » Mon Apr 27, 2009 11:43 pm

Kodama wrote:A degree does not bestow a right over another person. There are many bio medical professionals who are opposed to animal testing.

The argument is winnable in terms of human safety, wasted money (donations, tax dollars, drug prices), scientific validity and, yes, ethics.

If our society does not devolve or destroy our own habitat, I personally believe that we will find ourselves away from animal testing.

Just a hunch, not faith or anything...

Image
What's Chuck Norris doing on a dinosaur. Is that what they're riding in texas these days?

Tone Deft
Posts: 24152
Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 5:19 pm

Re: BAN ANIMAL EXPERIMENTS IN EU - VOTE NOW !

Post by Tone Deft » Mon Apr 27, 2009 11:43 pm

stringtapper wrote:
Tone Deft wrote:fail.
Is it uncomfortable to know someone could find no worth in either side's opinions?
omfg go away. it's the 'holier than thou I'm not left, I'm not right, I'm above it all' attitude. oh so clever. :roll: you're just rattling my chain, piss off.

there's value to ALL opinions, except yours. :P
the clueless people - popular opinion
the scientists - where the rubber meets the road
PETA - the voice for those that have no voice
you - sitting on the side jacking off to the mirror



Scott, Kodama - LOL!



how many animals were used in testing just so we can argue online about testing on animals?
In my life
Why do I smile
At people who I'd much rather kick in the eye?
-Moz

Homebelly
Posts: 2891
Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2007 9:52 pm
Location: Aotearoa New Zealand
Contact:

Re: BAN ANIMAL EXPERIMENTS IN EU - VOTE NOW !

Post by Homebelly » Mon Apr 27, 2009 11:45 pm

Kodama wrote:
stringtapper wrote:
Tone Deft wrote:fail.
Is it uncomfortable to know someone could find no worth in either side's opinions?

You have a Lemur, STFU.
:lol: 8)
15" 2.4 MBP/Live/Sampler/Operator/ Home made Dumble clone/Two Strats/One Jazz Bass.
Come and visit any time= Soundcloud

Post Reply