wave-editor with vst support for batchprocessing
wave-editor with vst support for batchprocessing
hi, folks!
id like to do same batching with my samples combined with some vsts to put some fx into some dull samples.
do you know a wave-editor that supports vsts and let me define exactly what will happen during the batch process (when using a vst reverb with wavosaur the tail is allways cut because the duration of the vst effect only lasts as long as the sample itself)
i hope u understand me.
i wonder what youll come up with
id like to do same batching with my samples combined with some vsts to put some fx into some dull samples.
do you know a wave-editor that supports vsts and let me define exactly what will happen during the batch process (when using a vst reverb with wavosaur the tail is allways cut because the duration of the vst effect only lasts as long as the sample itself)
i hope u understand me.
i wonder what youll come up with
-
Rogue Scrunt
- Posts: 1272
- Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2006 6:32 am
- Location: Colorado Springs, USA
Re: wave-editor with vst support for batchprocessing
help me to help you.
mac or pc?
mac or pc?
for lots of great records, check out,
http://stores.ebay.com/id=64360994?ssPageName=ME:F:ST
http://stores.ebay.com/id=64360994?ssPageName=ME:F:ST
Re: wave-editor with vst support for batchprocessing
hi, Rogue Scrunt! thanks for wanting to help. im on a winXp machine.
Re: wave-editor with vst support for batchprocessing
bump dat rump! still searchin. any hintz?
Re: wave-editor with vst support for batchprocessing
Wavelab will do it.
tarekith
https://tarekith.com
https://tarekith.com
Re: wave-editor with vst support for batchprocessing
hi, Tarekith! which version of wavelab would do the job?Tarekith wrote:Wavelab will do it.
and 2nd: ive been looking on the steinberg hp but couldnt find any demo version of wavelab. isnt there any at all?
edit: version 6 has not a demo yet, but 5 does. installing now. has it got that feature allready?
edit2: tested it out and it seems it does the same cutoff as wavosaur. did you even read my complete first post, Tarekith?
Re: wave-editor with vst support for batchprocessing
serious bump. please help a brother 
-
seismicexplo
- Posts: 61
- Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2009 8:43 pm
Re: wave-editor with vst support for batchprocessing
adobe audition can do batch processing with vsts
but im not sure if it adds the tail when doing reverbs
but could be that you can add silence to the end of each sample in a batch
hope this helps
seis.
but im not sure if it adds the tail when doing reverbs
but could be that you can add silence to the end of each sample in a batch
hope this helps
seis.
Re: wave-editor with vst support for batchprocessing
in order to do this, you will need to end up with a larger sample than your original. i'm not sure how you would tell an editor to automatically do this.
maybe you could batch copy and paste the files into larger ones, so that there is enough silence at the end for the reverb to die away? EDIT: seis above has a better idea.
here's an idea:
how does ableton handle this? if you have a one-shot sample with a reverb vst and you freeze it, does the entire reverb tail get saved?
if so, you could drop all the samples into a single ableton track, add the effect, then freeze the whole track.
maybe you could batch copy and paste the files into larger ones, so that there is enough silence at the end for the reverb to die away? EDIT: seis above has a better idea.
here's an idea:
how does ableton handle this? if you have a one-shot sample with a reverb vst and you freeze it, does the entire reverb tail get saved?
if so, you could drop all the samples into a single ableton track, add the effect, then freeze the whole track.
Re: wave-editor with vst support for batchprocessing
hi, friends!
thnks for answering.
1.: i allready thaught about the "add silence first" workaround and wanted to avoid that but i guess ill have to do that which depends on how live renders the frozen tracks. usually i just get weird noise when i open recently frozen tracks into winamp. i can load em into live and they sound just nice. but the freezing option could be a very useful thang in deed.
ima hit ja....
thnks for answering.
1.: i allready thaught about the "add silence first" workaround and wanted to avoid that but i guess ill have to do that which depends on how live renders the frozen tracks. usually i just get weird noise when i open recently frozen tracks into winamp. i can load em into live and they sound just nice. but the freezing option could be a very useful thang in deed.
ima hit ja....