Can live beat the competition ? ---> non-linear arranging

Discuss music production with Ableton Live.
Machinesworking
Posts: 11551
Joined: Wed Jun 23, 2004 9:30 pm
Location: Seattle

Re: Can live beat the competition ? ---> non-linear arranging

Post by Machinesworking » Sun Sep 13, 2009 3:01 am

I'm all for it. Ableton are a business, they trade hard to implement features in Session View for gloss like all the others do, with new plug ins etc.
No doubt Cakewalk has automation recordable in it's session view. Nothing wrong with lighting a fire under Abletons ass. 8)

kb420
Posts: 2772
Joined: Fri Jan 13, 2006 3:35 am
Location: Cydonia on the 4th Planet

Re: Can live beat the competition ? ---> non-linear arranging

Post by kb420 » Sun Sep 13, 2009 3:21 am

That "Groove Matrix" will have a lot of limitations compared to Live's Session View, the first limitation being that you can't record directly into a "cell" as they call it. If you aren't a Sonar user, then take it from me, composing in Sonar is very cumbersome if you are use to composing in Live. You have to hit the stop button just about anytime you want to do something.
"That which does not kill us makes us stronger..........."
-Friedrich Nietzsche-

starving student
Posts: 7129
Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2004 6:13 pm
Location: right here

Re: Can live beat the competition ? ---> non-linear arranging

Post by starving student » Sun Sep 13, 2009 3:31 am

I think they're trying to copy project 5

kb420
Posts: 2772
Joined: Fri Jan 13, 2006 3:35 am
Location: Cydonia on the 4th Planet

Re: Can live beat the competition ? ---> non-linear arranging

Post by kb420 » Sun Sep 13, 2009 3:35 am

Well, there were a lot of P5 users who were waiting on an update for some time now. Cakewalk finally admitted that they officially are not developing P5 anymore.

Sonar 8.5 is actually Cakewalk incorporating P5 into Sonar.
"That which does not kill us makes us stronger..........."
-Friedrich Nietzsche-

Machinesworking
Posts: 11551
Joined: Wed Jun 23, 2004 9:30 pm
Location: Seattle

Re: Can live beat the competition ? ---> non-linear arranging

Post by Machinesworking » Sun Sep 13, 2009 4:13 am

Sure, it's gonna suck, it's Cakewalk for crying out loud? but some dorks will be enticed by it, and if it implements even one feature that I wish Live did, then Ableton will probably be forced to implement it too. This is good! 8)

jlgrimes
Posts: 1781
Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 1:55 am
Location: Atlanta, Ga

Re: Can live beat the competition ? ---> non-linear arranging

Post by jlgrimes » Sun Sep 13, 2009 1:28 pm

kb420 wrote:That "Groove Matrix" will have a lot of limitations compared to Live's Session View, the first limitation being that you can't record directly into a "cell" as they call it. If you aren't a Sonar user, then take it from me, composing in Sonar is very cumbersome if you are use to composing in Live. You have to hit the stop button just about anytime you want to do something.
Sonar 7 or 8 implemented the arm tracks while sequence is playing function,

But yeah Sonar's method of composing is "different" than Lives. Probably the worst thing with Sonar is the lack of Drum Racks. Drum Racks have really changed the game in composing for me.

Sonar is probably putting an end to Project 5 and are putting all of the features in Sonar before shutting it off.

Project 5 has nothing on Live though.

That said though for Basic audio tracking and mixing, I like Sonar better than Live. Sonar's arrangement view is much better. and has many options for tweaking stuff. It only helps the competition.

lunabass
Posts: 996
Joined: Thu Oct 24, 2002 7:13 am
Location: Adelaide, Australia
Contact:

Re: Can live beat the competition ? ---> non-linear arranging

Post by lunabass » Mon Sep 14, 2009 4:40 am

spot on machines.

this can only be a good thing for us live users...
:: STAK ::
Music for Visual Media
www.staksounds.com
@staksounds

starving student
Posts: 7129
Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2004 6:13 pm
Location: right here

Re: Can live beat the competition ? ---> non-linear arranging

Post by starving student » Mon Sep 14, 2009 6:59 am

Machinesworking wrote:Sure, it's gonna suck, it's Cakewalk for crying out loud? but some dorks will be enticed by it, and if it implements even one feature that I wish Live did, then Ableton will probably be forced to implement it too. This is good! 8)
yep if it even syncs to hardware then ableton will be embarrassed into making it work in Live

mholloway
Posts: 1579
Joined: Sat Nov 29, 2008 7:24 pm
Location: Portland, Oregon, USA

Re: Can live beat the competition ? ---> non-linear arranging

Post by mholloway » Mon Sep 14, 2009 7:21 am

you guys are silly. this kind of shit is totally inevitable. cubase already did something like that back with 4. and also: who cares? maybe people will use it and like it. so what? you have ableton. be happy!

this is what i post like when drinking many beers.

-M
my industrial music made with Ableton Live (as DEAD WHEN I FOUND HER): https://deadwhenifoundher.bandcamp.com/
my dark jazz / noir music made with Ableton Live: https://michaelarthurholloway.bandcamp. ... guilt-noir

thumperjack
Posts: 266
Joined: Sat Nov 04, 2006 2:57 am
Location: audio

Re: Can live beat the competition ? ---> non-linear arranging

Post by thumperjack » Mon Sep 14, 2009 4:33 pm

Grappadura wrote:the question is - is it going to be possible to record absolute automation?
thats what MASCHINE is for!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZVyBcKEOtCw (...not sure if this is the right vid...it's one of the four)

"ABLETON LIVE inside of ABLETON LIVE" :arrow: :D :idea:
aburgener wrote:don't include me in your stupid fucking bitchfest because i made two posts about kebabs.
MBP-UB 17" 3.06 C2D, 4 gig RAM, Live 7.0.10, MOTU ultralite
guitarrig/ezdrummer/sd2.0/automat/battery/reaktor/massive/absynth

Post Reply