(OT and probably NSFW) Ultimate Gear Porn
-
Silverfish
- Posts: 753
- Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2006 8:53 pm
- Location: Calgary, AB
I'm gonna be a pretentious art snob for a minute and comment on this. 
While the piece is lacking in depth and exploration of extended themes and ideas, it does elicit a response. The sounds you hear in the piece, however, are only pleasurable in their context: a woman simulating a sex act on a microphone. If only audio were provided to an observer, and the clip was entitled, "microphone feedback in a broom closet", nobody would care. Perhaps it is the intention of the artist to explore how what we see affects what we hear.
Or it could be a woman giving a microphone a BJ.
While the piece is lacking in depth and exploration of extended themes and ideas, it does elicit a response. The sounds you hear in the piece, however, are only pleasurable in their context: a woman simulating a sex act on a microphone. If only audio were provided to an observer, and the clip was entitled, "microphone feedback in a broom closet", nobody would care. Perhaps it is the intention of the artist to explore how what we see affects what we hear.
Or it could be a woman giving a microphone a BJ.
hooray for pretentious art snobs!Silverfish wrote:I'm gonna be a pretentious art snob for a minute and comment on this.
While the piece is lacking in depth and exploration of extended themes and ideas, it does elicit a response. The sounds you hear in the piece, however, are only pleasurable in their context: a woman simulating a sex act on a microphone. If only audio were provided to an observer, and the clip was entitled, "microphone feedback in a broom closet", nobody would care. Perhaps it is the intention of the artist to explore how what we see affects what we hear.
Or it could be a woman giving a microphone a BJ.
IMO, microphone feedback in a broom closet holds more artistic integrity than some tart mouthfucking a mic. it sounds a little more thought out than an excuse to show off an unrelated "talent"
yes, I would classify it as art, and this discussion is proof. anything that elicits a response can be art.
doesn't mean its still not shit though.
the WORST "art" piece I've ever seen was called defiled.
it was 2 files (the kind you shape metal with) sitting on a shelf. that was it.
-
OvertoneZero
- Posts: 1347
- Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2007 9:16 pm
Pitch Black wrote:since you asked...BongoBennie wrote:That looked like some shitty head, I want some gag action.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w3ttUWeaeTA
I threw up a little in my mouth
