Page 3 of 4

Posted: Tue Dec 19, 2006 12:49 pm
by FrankH
jendask wrote:So I guess I am obliged to use a different for every program change right?
A different clip, yes.

Posted: Tue Dec 19, 2006 1:12 pm
by jendask
Thanks
Well I'd like to ask something more. Should I change the program from the vsti or from the clip notes tab, or is it the same?
In the second case how can I map the numbers to the program names?

Posted: Wed Dec 20, 2006 10:46 am
by jendask
A little more help please...

Posted: Wed Dec 20, 2006 11:07 am
by FrankH
In my judgment a VSTI is an MIDI-instrument like all others, so you have to do program changes in the clips. Mapping names is not a feature within the Clip MIDI Editor.

On the other hand, in Live 6 you can use Instrument Racks, those are very powerfull!

Posted: Wed Dec 20, 2006 12:38 pm
by jendask
So, let's say a clip is already playing and I want to record a new clip with a different sound . I must record it in a new track so it can have a different sound (vsti program), right?
Also as far as I have understood, if I want to be able to choose programs by name (this is the only way I can recognize them!) I have to change from inside the vsti and not from the clip program change because there I can't see any names but just numbers...

i don't know

Posted: Wed Dec 20, 2006 12:45 pm
by FrankH
Hmmm, i'm not a heavy VSTi user so maybe someone has an answer?

Posted: Wed Dec 20, 2006 7:45 pm
by jendask
jendask wrote:So, let's say a clip is already playing and I want to record a new clip with a different sound . I must record it in a new track so it can have a different sound (vsti program), right?
Finally, I have created 15 different midi tracks. In the first five of them I have loaded B4 , in the five next Pro 53, and in the last five Mtron.
These tracks are not armed all the time because I have understood that this would be too heavy for my CPU (I have a Celeron 2,6, 512 RAM).
Also the devices(B4, Pro 53, Mtron) are not activated until I need to activate to record or playback. Does this also affect the CPU load?

could be

Posted: Wed Dec 20, 2006 7:53 pm
by FrankH
jendask wrote:
jendask wrote:So, let's say a clip is already playing and I want to record a new clip with a different sound . I must record it in a new track so it can have a different sound (vsti program), right?
Finally, I have created 15 different midi tracks. In the first five of them I have loaded B4 , in the five next Pro 53, and in the last five Mtron.
These tracks are not armed all the time because I have understood that this would be too heavy for my CPU (I have a Celeron 2,6, 512 RAM).
Also the devices(B4, Pro 53, Mtron) are not activated until I need to activate to record or playback. Does this also affect the CPU load?
Have you tried it yet?
If an instrument is not used it should / could have zero CPU load, but trying it is the only way to know if this is true for your plug-ins.
BTW. 512 MB is not very much for an audio computer.

Posted: Tue Dec 26, 2006 8:51 am
by bbtr
hi!
Machinate says that all the program change messages for bank one are on the website of Covert Operators, however I browsed it thoroughly and could not find them.
Could anyone post the link here please? It will be much appreciated.

Posted: Mon Jan 08, 2007 1:10 pm
by jendask
I haven't found them either...

Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2007 11:57 am
by queglay
i had a look on there too. i would love to find them! all i could find was this article.

http://www.thecovertoperators.org/archives/163#more-163

this sounds exciting and may solve alot of my problems in live!

Posted: Tue Oct 09, 2007 9:34 am
by queglay
ive been playing with using chains and ranges to get around not being able to do program changes. its funny, because i thought the point of it was that it would disable everything in a chain if if wasn't selected for a range.

but i know that pretty much everything in the chain is actually active and using my cpu. so does anyone know why this is and is there another alternative?

Posted: Tue Oct 09, 2007 10:21 am
by hoffman2k
Those files were on our old server. I'll have a look. They're somewhere in my backups.

Posted: Tue Oct 09, 2007 10:23 am
by hoffman2k

Posted: Tue Oct 09, 2007 11:41 pm
by queglay
so does anyone know why the chains and rack method is using up so much cpu? it definitely isn't turning of all the devices when the chain isn't selected.