A Very Un-Inspiring set Seen on mpc/ turntables

chrysalis33rpm · Post by **chrysalis33rpm** » Tue Jul 24, 2007 10:59 pm

It is not about how it looks. It is about the passion you have while doing it.

BinaryB · Post by **BinaryB** » Tue Jul 24, 2007 11:06 pm

chrysalis33rpm wrote:It is not about how it looks. It is about the passion you have while doing it.

+1

Tone Deft · Post by **Tone Deft** » Tue Jul 24, 2007 11:14 pm

BinaryB wrote:
chrysalis33rpm wrote:It is not about how it looks. It is about the passion you have while doing it.
+1

In that case, meet William Hung, vocalist of the year (or was that last year?)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iwMjpt62Ja4

Paula agrees with you.
Simon disagrees with you.
Randy agrees that his attempt is fun but his talent is laughable.

stale bread · Post by **stale bread** » Wed Jul 25, 2007 12:41 am

chrysalis33rpm wrote:It is not about how it looks. It is about the passion you have while doing it.

i think its pretty obvious that that is what the op is talking about, this thread is kind of funny.

leisuremuffin · Post by **leisuremuffin** » Wed Jul 25, 2007 12:45 am

bullshit.

"it looks like they're checking email" is a comment on what it is visually.

are we reading two different things?

.lm.

leisuremuffin · Post by **leisuremuffin** » Wed Jul 25, 2007 12:51 am

you want to make it a fucking semantics thing, then fine, the "performance" doesn't matter. close your fucking eyes and listen. You are judging with your eyes. It's cool that you disagree with me, but stop pretending that its something it isn't.

it's fucking retarded, you tell me "i'm not judging the music with my eyes" but then you say the exact opposite!

If this group had costumes and electrified penis-pump midi controllers it wiould be good? NO is the answer. Can good music be played by a person sitting in front of a laptop just nodding their head and tweaking their controllers? YES! and what the fuck are you trying to look at? They aren't doing anything. Shut the fuck up and LISTEN to some music. If you want visual entertainment, go to a fucking movie, play or art show. If you want to hear music, fucking listen to it and stop talking about how lame "email checkers" are. close minded bullshit.

.lm.

leisuremuffin · Post by **leisuremuffin** » Wed Jul 25, 2007 1:01 am

you disagree? Fine. But stop telling me i'm not understanding what you're saying. I do get it. I just think it's bullshit.

How the fuck do you think your statement isn't about judging the music with your eyes, though?

.lm.

EgAD · Post by **EgAD** » Wed Jul 25, 2007 1:44 am

dude are you on crack, I'm talking about the performance. this isn't semantics its fuckin vocabulary, I don't know why you keep talking about performance and music quality like it is the same thing, or implying that I am.

it's easy to see from my first post that I was making a very basic statement, laptop performers face performance challenges in todays music scene, alot of folk think this is attributed to the fact that they're using laptops, I disagree, I used this video to point out 'as i said i might add in my first post' that these artist are using hardware but still their performance lacks bigtime (it has no passion), so laptop performers can expect the same results from a lousy performance that lacks any passion.

why in your brain would you think my post meant that the visual equates to the quality of the music when i was clearlly talking about the performance is beyond me.

L.M. if your music is great, the best in the world, the best that any human has ever heard before in history then kudos to you, but if while you're playing that music you performance is like those in that clip, then your performance sucks.
how much more clear can one make something that is perfectly clear already.

EgAD · Post by **EgAD** » Wed Jul 25, 2007 1:50 am

EgAD wrote:
this is a video not about laptop djing that illustrates exactly why laptop djs should really think about how they perform because as you can see even with hardware instruments your performance can suck royaly, so what makes us think that doin this on a laptop would suck any less.

peace and goodluck with your shows

http://youtube.com/watch?v=y-4NvsprJA0

clear

leisuremuffin · Post by **leisuremuffin** » Wed Jul 25, 2007 3:42 am

bro, it's clear.

you are focused on a visual aspect of the performance, that is totally not relevant to me.

In your opinion it is.

do you get it, now, from my side?

i don't care what the fuck a musician is doing on stage visually and you do. It's that simple.

.lm.

leisuremuffin · Post by **leisuremuffin** » Wed Jul 25, 2007 3:52 am

who fucking cares about the "performance" other than what is vibrating in the air?

unfortunately most people, which is why so much "music" sucks. The "show" has become more important than the content in a lot of cases.

look, instead of arguing what we're arguing about, why don't you consider this:

given that that group was playing mediocre music at best, would a better visual presentation somehow make it any more valuable? You're saying it would, or at least implying it. I'm saying, no, it would only succeed in making it more appealing to people who don't give a shit about music in the first place.

true?

.lm.

EgAD · Post by **EgAD** » Wed Jul 25, 2007 5:01 am

leisuremuffin wrote:who fucking cares about the "performance" other than what is vibrating in the air?

unfortunately most people, which is why so much "music" sucks. The "show" has become more important than the content in a lot of cases.

look, instead of arguing what we're arguing about, why don't you consider this:

given that that group was playing mediocre music at best, would a better visual presentation somehow make it any more valuable? You're saying it would, or at least implying it. I'm saying, no, it would only succeed in making it more appealing to people who don't give a shit about music in the first place.

true?

.lm.

I think you're operating in the confines of extremes, that's too black and white for me, first of all we almost agreed until you said that i believe better visuals would make the music better, I've said nothing of the sort and in actuality believe the exact opposite. people make great music all day long in there studios everyday, i'm as tired of this argument as you are
suffice to say that you don't differentiate from the 'music' and the 'performance', but I do. I don't think a better performance would have helped those guys 'music' at all, but I do believe that a better performance
would have helped their performance imensley
shit there are people making great music that don't even perform at all, that's a truth beyond debate but it's not what this thread is about.

but yo, we feel differntly that's cool, thanks for the discussion.

dys4ik · Post by **dys4ik** » Wed Jul 25, 2007 3:03 pm

If I want to listen to the music I can do it at home in the comfort of my office.

I don't want to pay to see a bunch of people stand around and mimic studio albums while appearing for all intents and purposes to be puppets on strings.

jonesonyou · Post by **jonesonyou** » Wed Jul 25, 2007 3:11 pm

that music was bad.

chrysalis33rpm · Post by **chrysalis33rpm** » Wed Jul 25, 2007 3:23 pm

EgAD wrote:... a better performance
would have helped their performance imensley...

Well, that's infallible logic right there. I agree. A better performance would have certainly helped their perfomance. Where's the arguement?

A Very Un-Inspiring set Seen on mpc/ turntables

Re: The Wackest shit I've Ever Seen on mpc or turntables