Lives sound engine argument again ...

Discuss music production with Ableton Live.
evon
Posts: 1113
Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 7:44 pm
Location: Jamrock

Re: Lives sound engine argument again ...

Post by evon » Wed Aug 19, 2009 1:52 pm

sschall wrote:
leedsquietman wrote: The reason WHY people say Logic, Cubase and others sound better is a)
People (especially us musicians) are only trying to express in words what they are actually hearing..only politicians and the other peeps with ulterior motives "say things".
fe real!

evon
Posts: 1113
Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 7:44 pm
Location: Jamrock

Re: Lives sound engine argument again ...

Post by evon » Wed Aug 19, 2009 2:04 pm

Tone Deft wrote:fuck the mature users. :P I do applaud your mature response. :D

it's a strong statement to post on a DAW's forum that it sounds worse than other DAWs. people will read statements like that and judge the software accordingly. it's a judgment on the bread and butter of the company's quality profile.

.
I would have thought people would have listened and "judge the software" for themselves. Lets hope that is not how you were attracted to Live, based on what people said about it.

My statements are not intended to bash Live but to let my opinion be heard with so that if there is consensus, the DAW that we love so much will be better off for it and eventually so will us all.

It is easier to prove that what I am saying is not "rubbish" than to prove what I perceive when I listen to a DAW's sound quality.

Also, a company must earn their "bread & butter" honestly as they would like to be portrayed, or is Live a con artist's game? I know that it is not.
In fact Tone Deft, you should really examine the statements you make they are so pathetic. Live does not need any body to beg for a clientele..they are good enough to earn it, and indeed they have. They could still be better off without people kissing up to live instead of disecting the software from a user point of view. Live is not perfect, but as long as we continue to show up the imperfections we find, it will pretty soon be near perfect.

Bye folks see you on another topic.

OT. Congrats to the Lightning Bolt, 9.58..whew!
fe real!

sschall
Posts: 34
Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 2:04 pm

Re: Lives sound engine argument again ...

Post by sschall » Wed Aug 19, 2009 2:43 pm

evon wrote:So why not use the best sound/audio available to make the music?!
Here you go:

http://www.moogmusic.com/voyager/
http://www.davesmithinstruments.com/products/p8/
http://www.apogeedigital.com
http://www.avalondesign.com/comp2044.html
http://www.lexicon.com
http://www.mackie.com/products/hrmk2series/index.html
http://www.ams-neve.com

Just a humble and maybe subjective collection to start with, of course. Enjoy!

sampletanker
Posts: 55
Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 5:07 am

Re: Lives sound engine argument again ...

Post by sampletanker » Wed Aug 19, 2009 2:51 pm

pepsi or coke
chevy or ford
apple or microsoft
democrat or republican
red sox or yankees
tupac or notorious b.i.g
crips or bloods
parkay or margarine
glass half empty or glass half full
to be or not to be

leedsquietman
Posts: 6659
Joined: Sun Nov 19, 2006 1:56 am
Location: greater toronto area

Re: Lives sound engine argument again ...

Post by leedsquietman » Wed Aug 19, 2009 2:55 pm

I AM a MUSICIAN. Also a producer, engineer and occasionally do mastering work, with 23 years of experience, various qualifications and diplomas etc.

Cubase, Logic and Live SOUND THE SAME.

And they null raw, unprocessed audio in a null test.
http://soundcloud.com/umbriel-rising http://www.myspace.com/leedsquietmandemos Live 7.0.18 SUITE, Cubase 5.5.2], Soundforge 9, Dell XPS M1530, 2.2 Ghz C2D, 4GB, Vista Ult SP2, legit plugins a plenty, Alesis IO14.

evon
Posts: 1113
Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 7:44 pm
Location: Jamrock

Re: Lives sound engine argument again ...

Post by evon » Wed Aug 19, 2009 3:16 pm

leedsquietman wrote:I AM a MUSICIAN. Also a producer, engineer and occasionally do mastering work, with 23 years of experience, various qualifications and diplomas etc.

Cubase, Logic and Live SOUND THE SAME.

And they null raw, unprocessed audio in a null test.


Or..what you actually mean is that they should sound the same, however in reality they all sound different and there were countless blindfold tests done to prove that.

Really mean it this time...see you all on the next topic.
Last edited by evon on Wed Aug 19, 2009 3:20 pm, edited 1 time in total.
fe real!

sschall
Posts: 34
Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 2:04 pm

Re: Lives sound engine argument again ...

Post by sschall » Wed Aug 19, 2009 3:20 pm

evon wrote:
leedsquietman wrote:I AM a MUSICIAN. Also a producer, engineer and occasionally do mastering work, with 23 years of experience, various qualifications and diplomas etc.

Cubase, Logic and Live SOUND THE SAME.

And they null raw, unprocessed audio in a null test.


Or..what you actually mean is that they should sound the same, however in reality they all sound different and there were countless blindfold tests done to prove that.
Name and show one.

ethios4
Posts: 5377
Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2003 6:28 am

Re: Lives sound engine argument again ...

Post by ethios4 » Wed Aug 19, 2009 3:20 pm

Link to these tests or FAIL.

I'm thinking you're just trolling because you're not actually saying anything useful here, just stirring the fire. Ok, we get the point that YOU think there's a problem, but you don't substantiate your claim at all. You're the one slinging shit, so the burden of proof falls on you.

knotkranky
Posts: 4336
Joined: Tue Mar 14, 2006 7:08 pm
Location: la

Re: Lives sound engine argument again ...

Post by knotkranky » Wed Aug 19, 2009 8:47 pm

evon wrote:
knotkranky wrote:
evon wrote: This is not about music.this is about sound.. the quality... the characteristics of a sound!!
Based on all the unbiased comments..Live sucks in comparison.
Speak to the guys that make hits..guys that know how to make sounds pleasing to sell millions.
Lets face it, that definately is not Live's forte.
no, it's about music. The stars don't question what they use cuz they're busy.
What the big record makers don't get, is frustrated at gear. It simply isn't used if so.
Facts are, Abes does not cater to that click, but hits can be made on just about any medium.

So why not use the best sound/audio available to make the music?!
Because quality music come before quality audio. There's no such thing as the best audio and there are many other things that quantify quality or "best" with ease-of-use and convenience being two of those things, and they do make the sound too. Put "OK Computer" on a 128 mp3, It's still amazing right?

I don't use live for the quality. I use it for the Ui. Obviously ableton is riding fast and loose on that philosophy, but for you, me and plenty of others (but not everybody), it's a bit too much. Add (for many of us use to other apps) the sub-par stability/reliability factor and you start affecting the convenience and ease-of-use which negatively loops back over abletons great Ui.

It only has to sound "pretty good" and flow "pretty well", but i'm afraid "features bloat" and its subsequent ever growing punch-list will keep that an impossibility for me and plenty of others. (but fortunately for abes, not everyone)

leedsquietman
Posts: 6659
Joined: Sun Nov 19, 2006 1:56 am
Location: greater toronto area

Re: Lives sound engine argument again ...

Post by leedsquietman » Wed Aug 19, 2009 9:01 pm

No SHOULD (sound the same). It does. In the words of Yoda - DO OR DO NOT DO - THERE IS NO TRY.

If it doesn't sound the same it's because you are setting one or the other up differently. Or Warping, as described by others.

I use Cubase, Logic, Sound Forge and PTHD regularly as well as Live. PTHD is the only one which sounds slightly different, due to it's integer fixed point conversion (48 bit) instead of 32 bit floating. Sonar and Reaper are 64 bit, but still SOUND the same, because the differences are virtually inaudible (your dog may notice a slight difference).

Like I said before, Pan Law can also affect the sound minutely if you find the same pan law in Live as your other app, or make them the same you will notice the difference. Logic and Cubase default to -3dB AFAIK. Changeable to -6dB or 0db.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pan_law
http://soundcloud.com/umbriel-rising http://www.myspace.com/leedsquietmandemos Live 7.0.18 SUITE, Cubase 5.5.2], Soundforge 9, Dell XPS M1530, 2.2 Ghz C2D, 4GB, Vista Ult SP2, legit plugins a plenty, Alesis IO14.

ollyb303
Posts: 2666
Joined: Wed Jun 25, 2008 3:49 pm
Location: Bristol, UK
Contact:

Re: Lives sound engine argument again ...

Post by ollyb303 » Wed Aug 19, 2009 9:12 pm

sampletanker wrote: parkay or margarine
Errrr, BUTTER every time!

I see no good reason for either of these products to exist.

Oh, and can everybody quit whining about a problem that doesn't exist and go make some music? That's where I'm headed.
.:O:B:1:.
ob1techno.com

knotkranky
Posts: 4336
Joined: Tue Mar 14, 2006 7:08 pm
Location: la

Re: Lives sound engine argument again ...

Post by knotkranky » Wed Aug 19, 2009 9:45 pm

ollyb303 wrote:
sampletanker wrote: parkay or margarine
Errrr, BUTTER every time!

I see no good reason for either of these products to exist.

Oh, and can everybody quit whining about a problem that doesn't exist and go make some music? That's where I'm headed.
+1 butter.

hmm, how could you possibly know that it doesn't exist? :wink:

SubFunk
Posts: 7853
Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 3:41 pm
Location: A Big Toilet Called Berlin
Contact:

Re: Lives sound engine argument again ...

Post by SubFunk » Wed Aug 19, 2009 10:05 pm

Oh, and can everybody quit whining about a problem that doesn't exist and go make some music? That's where I'm headed.
nah, you are to serious
*** Image GAFM ***

Rinsemeister
Posts: 843
Joined: Sun Nov 25, 2007 11:08 am
Location: Up in the Mountains NW of Alicante, Spain

Re: Lives sound engine argument again ...

Post by Rinsemeister » Wed Aug 19, 2009 10:08 pm

I've just done a totally scientific test of Ableton's audio engine and the good news is...................

My cat thinks it's the dog's bollox!

Personally, I'm confused because cats and dogs don't get on.

Reading between the lines I think my cat thinks Live sounds shite. 8O

But! He's never used another DAW in his life..........

What I really think is that my cat doesn't like my toons. :cry:

Z.

cperezzzzz
Posts: 37
Joined: Thu Aug 20, 2009 12:02 am
Location: World Tour

Re: Lives sound engine argument again ...

Post by cperezzzzz » Fri Aug 21, 2009 12:52 pm

The Top 10 Music Applications
Q2, 2009, based on search requests

1. Pro Tools
2. Cubase
3. FL Studio
4. Cakewalk Sonar
5. Apple Logic
6. Adobe Audition
7. Ableton Live
8. Apple Garageband
9. Sound Forge
10. Sony Acid
http://www.synthtopia.com/content/2009/ ... the-world/
voted MOST POPULAR FORUM MEMBER 2009.

Post Reply