Slightlydelic wrote:yeah i mentioned doing something like this recently, best tip i can give is to use samper instead of simpler and spread the samples acoss the keys instead of droping them on pads in a drum rack, its much more memory and CPU efficent.
selthym wrote:If I use Sampler is there a simple way to map a number of hits across the keyboard without having to manually draw in the keyzones?
selthym wrote:Whilst writing the above I thought I should try right clicking and see what appeared and there is an option to Distribute ranges equally.
I had almost the exact same thought process as you selthym upon reading Slightlydelic's response to my OP. Personally I haven't any problems at all with slowdown/mem usage even with many of these Audition Racks at once, but I have heard before that Simpler works my loading the sample into RAM, whereas Sampler reads from the hard disk. So is this what you are referring to Slightlydelic??
To me there are big advantages to using Simplers in a drum rack (instead of one sampler though). I should note though, that
the Macro ranges in my rack SHOULD BE CHANGED to the default [0-127] for it to work like I like now. The reason for this is then you can simply drop any samples you want into the drum rack, and they will each be assigned to only one of the 128 pads. This is important because I've figured out that the computer KEYBOARD's arrow keys are perfect for flipping through samples too. So I click on the Macro and then use the left/right arrow keys to move through the possible samples. The catch is that (as far as I can tell

) the arrows always move in +1 increments. Basically, the Macro knob must have a full 128-step range in order for each key-press cycle you 1 sample.
You need to use the "simpler racks"-method to ensure that your samples aren't spread across multiple notes. This is where the "Distribute Ranges Equally" trick fails, unless you have exactly 128 samples

. The "Distribute" command also makes putting together Audition Racks on the fly unworkable, (
even if you don't care about using the arrow keys) because you'd have to select every sample and RE-"distribute" again each time you added another sample. Using the drum racks you can remove and add samples at will with no hiccups.
And another powerful bonus to using the simplers (

) is that you can look at the Macro knob to see what SampleNumber you're on, and the sample will always have that number, even if you delete prior samples or add extra samples in the rack. Once again, because of the [(one sample)=(one note)] thing, you can, for example, look at the Macro knob to see that you like "C1-Sample#17", and easily find it again later. If you do the single sampler or "distribute ranges equally" thing, then any one sample will likely be spread over multiple note#'s, which will change any time that sample SET is altered.
Sorry...lol

, if you can't tell I spent a good while playing around with this stuff the other day. If there's another way to do the things I refer to above, like "Arrow Key Cycling", "Sample Naming #'s", "Sample SET Alteration", etc., then I'd love to hear it because I imagine there are advantages to using a single samplers too.
Peace.