Have you ever...
-
Mint Invader
- Posts: 1508
- Joined: Mon May 18, 2009 2:37 pm
Have you ever...
... Started a track one night and get so much energy from it you dont sleep till 8a.m.?
Because Whatever.
-
funky shit
- Posts: 3977
- Joined: Thu May 24, 2007 9:50 pm
- Location: Earth
-
leedsquietman
- Posts: 6659
- Joined: Sun Nov 19, 2006 1:56 am
- Location: greater toronto area
Re: Have you ever...
Sure. I've got so I couldn't sleep for 3 days before.
Problem is, you need to stop and check yourself sometimes, otherwise things go to shit.
If you spent 16 hours straight working on a track, the last thing you should do is keep on without a break and spend another 4-5 hours mixing it. Pound to a penny it will sound like crap when you wake up in the morning.
Problem is, you need to stop and check yourself sometimes, otherwise things go to shit.
If you spent 16 hours straight working on a track, the last thing you should do is keep on without a break and spend another 4-5 hours mixing it. Pound to a penny it will sound like crap when you wake up in the morning.
http://soundcloud.com/umbriel-rising http://www.myspace.com/leedsquietmandemos Live 7.0.18 SUITE, Cubase 5.5.2], Soundforge 9, Dell XPS M1530, 2.2 Ghz C2D, 4GB, Vista Ult SP2, legit plugins a plenty, Alesis IO14.
Re: Have you ever...
+1 and yes, i had that as well, but it is good to force yourself to take breaks and gain a bit of a distance again.leedsquietman wrote:Sure. I've got so I couldn't sleep for 3 days before.
Problem is, you need to stop and check yourself sometimes, otherwise things go to shit.
If you spent 16 hours straight working on a track, the last thing you should do is keep on without a break and spend another 4-5 hours mixing it. Pound to a penny it will sound like crap when you wake up in the morning.
you hardly can see the trees when you are permanently in the middle of the forest.
*** 
GAFM ***
GAFM ***Re: Have you ever...
you want to be corrected on your english, right ?
because you got it arseways, it's actually the other way around
''you can't see the forest for the trees''
meaning you can't see the bigger picture when you're stuck on the finer details.
the way you say it translates to you can't see the finer details, by being so focused on the bigger picture. But maybe that's what you meant ?
because you got it arseways, it's actually the other way around
''you can't see the forest for the trees''
meaning you can't see the bigger picture when you're stuck on the finer details.
the way you say it translates to you can't see the finer details, by being so focused on the bigger picture. But maybe that's what you meant ?
Pasha wrote:Thanks dum for being so precise.