What is The Fastest Powerbook equal to on a PC laptop
-
Alex Reynolds
- Posts: 989
- Joined: Sat Jul 13, 2002 5:48 am
- Location: Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Contact:
What application are you running?
x86 and PPC are two different processor sets that are good at solving two different sets of problems, so the answer really depends on what you're doing.
Roughly speaking, a 1 GHz PPC processor is equivalent -- very roughly -- to a 1.8 to 2 Ghz Pentium IV. Hardware optimizations help improve this ratio to more like 1:3.
When a program isn't optimized and is written poorly, PPC suffers badly. That ratio drops to 1:1, roughly.
-Alex
x86 and PPC are two different processor sets that are good at solving two different sets of problems, so the answer really depends on what you're doing.
Roughly speaking, a 1 GHz PPC processor is equivalent -- very roughly -- to a 1.8 to 2 Ghz Pentium IV. Hardware optimizations help improve this ratio to more like 1:3.
When a program isn't optimized and is written poorly, PPC suffers badly. That ratio drops to 1:1, roughly.
-Alex
-
Guest
thanks Alex
thanks man, i bet alot of platform crapwars could be avoided if people like myself would ask simple questions like that and people like you would give simple straight answers like that. thanks.
-
Guest
I agree with Alex. It depends on what you wanna do with it. I use 3 platforms OS9, OSX and XP. OS9 I use for apps not yet available for OSX, like Max/MSP, Pro Tools. OSX I use when I need stability, for instance the free VJ software KeyStroke. And XP I use for software which does not run on macs (and probably never will), like Sound Forge. I noticed that not choosing just one platform and flaming the other enables me to achieve certain goals faster and turn ideas into results faster. It's all about creativity. You don't need the fastest computers. Just combine what you have and see what comes out of it.
Just my 2 cents.
Just my 2 cents.
-
jazze
Well, it's very experimental software. Basically it can combine every type of digital media and morph it into something else. It has a very friendly both futuristic user interface. But you just have to try. It's worth the experience. Just apply to be a beta tester...wait for the confirmation and download the beta. And remember: it's a dutch product! 
-
Beaker
> Roughly speaking, a 1 GHz PPC processor is equivalent --
> very roughly -- to a 1.8 to 2 Ghz Pentium IV. Hardware
> optimizations help improve this ratio to more like 1:3.
Perhaps most technically remarkable is how this ratio seems to
grow even faster than Intel's advantage in clockspeed!!!!
(Is one allowed to mention hardware optimizations for x86?)
b
> very roughly -- to a 1.8 to 2 Ghz Pentium IV. Hardware
> optimizations help improve this ratio to more like 1:3.
Perhaps most technically remarkable is how this ratio seems to
grow even faster than Intel's advantage in clockspeed!!!!
(Is one allowed to mention hardware optimizations for x86?)
b
-
Alex Reynolds
- Posts: 989
- Joined: Sat Jul 13, 2002 5:48 am
- Location: Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Contact:
Sure, if you can find any mainstream applications that take advantage of it, other than perhaps Photoshop.Perhaps most technically remarkable is how this ratio seems to
grow even faster than Intel's advantage in clockspeed!!!!
(Is one allowed to mention hardware optimizations for x86?)
Find some numbers that show this comparison is incorrect. Else you're just trolling.
-Alex
-
beaker
uh.. why do i have to do the homework?Alex Reynolds wrote: Find some numbers that show this comparison is incorrect. Else you're just trolling.
two of these 3 sites are explicitly mac oriented..
http://www.digitalvideoediting.com/2002 ... cvspc2.htm
+summary from an appl fan cite:
http://www.aapltalk.com/shootouts/processor_notes.html
http://www.barefeats.com/pentium4.html
b
-
Alex Reynolds
- Posts: 989
- Joined: Sat Jul 13, 2002 5:48 am
- Location: Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Contact:
1) The first site is run by a self-admitted anti-Mac zealot running tests of After Effects, an application which has yet to be optimized by Adobe, probably in retaliation for FCP. Furthermore there are no specifications posted for his test environment. So in all likelihood he is purposefully comparing machines with two disparate configurations.
2) The second site shows a 1:1.5 ratio for general purpose tasks.
If you enhance code for Altivec, this ratio widens dramatically, to about 1:3. Feel free to subscribe to or google-search Apple's sci-tech mailing list for numbers reported by third-party developers.
3) The third site offers no numbers but tests various applications, which is more useful to someone making a purchase decision.
So...
Given I already said all of this is conditional, if you're not trolling, what is your point, exactly?
Frankly, I would much rather discuss ways to make Live run faster and more stable on the platform I use. If you prefer to use Wintel, go right ahead.
-Alex
2) The second site shows a 1:1.5 ratio for general purpose tasks.
If you enhance code for Altivec, this ratio widens dramatically, to about 1:3. Feel free to subscribe to or google-search Apple's sci-tech mailing list for numbers reported by third-party developers.
3) The third site offers no numbers but tests various applications, which is more useful to someone making a purchase decision.
So...
Given I already said all of this is conditional, if you're not trolling, what is your point, exactly?
Frankly, I would much rather discuss ways to make Live run faster and more stable on the platform I use. If you prefer to use Wintel, go right ahead.
-Alex