operator naysayers, I'm throwing down the gauntlet
operator naysayers, I'm throwing down the gauntlet
I challenge any creative music makers doubtful of Operator out there to lock your selves in a room for a whole weekend with nothing but live with operator and if you tell me monday morning you cant come up with something that makes you smile then your either a fool or a liar!
I'm starting to find the other synths aren't getting loaded up because I'm having an absolute ball with operator.
I'm starting to find the other synths aren't getting loaded up because I'm having an absolute ball with operator.
I personally think Operator is lot of fun to use, my issues aren't with what it's capable of. The problem is how much it costs, I just feel that $149 is a lot of money when you compare it to other softsynths.
Obviously the cost versus benefits point of view is a personal thing, which is why so many people have differing opinions on Operator IMO. If it had been $79 or maybe even $89, I would have bought it with no hesitation.
Obviously the cost versus benefits point of view is a personal thing, which is why so many people have differing opinions on Operator IMO. If it had been $79 or maybe even $89, I would have bought it with no hesitation.
tarekith
https://tarekith.com
https://tarekith.com
If you compare it to a 1958 USA fender strat versus a 1997 mexico squire and the price difference you're entering into much bigger arguments than $79 vs $149. The point I was just making is that it's a far bigger impressive synth than at first I thought, I bought it anyway at the start, but the more I use it the more I'm amazed. It's fucken good dude.
Re: operator naysayers, I'm throwing down the gauntlet
Your right FM is superb but that doesnt just include Operator. At the price it is Im still shying away from a purchase. I have FM hardware and software so its not like I really need Operator.forge wrote:I challenge any creative music makers doubtful of Operator out there to lock your selves in a room for a whole weekend with nothing but live with operator and if you tell me monday morning you cant come up with something that makes you smile then your either a fool or a liar!
I'm starting to find the other synths aren't getting loaded up because I'm having an absolute ball with operator.
You Operator doods dont need to convert us all you know
Re: operator naysayers, I'm throwing down the gauntlet
What you miss is the ability to use clip automation on *all* parameters. This, added with Live Fx behind Operator, gets you really nice soundsDJRetard wrote:I have FM hardware and software so its not like I really need Operator.
-
adhmzaiusz
- Posts: 533
- Joined: Wed Nov 17, 2004 12:32 am
- Location: the country side outside of Toronto
-
summersc2002
- Posts: 187
- Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2005 2:25 am
- Location: san diego
- Contact:
i personally think the fm7 is better sound wise, and there is alot more freedom in it as well, with routing of the operators and all modulation.
some kind of emachine computer/ pentium 4/ 2.53 ghz/ 100gb HD/ 150gb HD/ 1gb RM/ live 5/ Ni Komplete 2/ delta 1010/ triggerfinger/ keystation pro 88/nord lead 2 rack
-
Petteri Karjalainen
- Posts: 76
- Joined: Mon Jun 28, 2004 7:31 am
- Contact:

