What does Robert Henke have to lose?
What does Robert Henke have to lose?
Curiosity got the better of me, I searched the internet for a few hours looking for legit mp3s from Monolake, I can't say I found one.
So my question is; Why do electronic musicians shoot themselves in the foot trying to make sure people don't get their music for free (not illegal download). It is common practice these days for popular indie bands to feature some of their songs on a website, with perhaps a video, and some promo pics. In fact I have seen entire albums available from certain artists over the internet, that were not illegal. (I can give examples if you doubt it). What makes electronic musicians with a small bit of success feel the need to not use this powerful marketing tool?
Anyway I formulated some opinions, but none of them are solid, please feel free to add to/correct my list of reasons.
a. Electronic music is less defined generally, and easier to rip off intellectually. Hence the artist may feel less inclined to put unreleased/demo's on the internet for fear that someone may make a copy and claim it as their own, and without much legal protection it would be hard to prove ownership in a court of law, especially internationally.
b. Artists feel that they are being ripped off already with mp3 downloads and don't want to perpetuate the cycle by making themselves more known on the internet.
c. The artist believes that their work should be paid for, and that any free downloads would undermine that ideal.
Of course I am not talking about you bedroom musicians (i'm one also), who post their music regularly on the internet. I am talking about those of you with a bit of success and a regular fan base.
That said I am in no way complaining about this practice, I just wonder at it's logic.
Edit (poll is just a bit of humor really)
So my question is; Why do electronic musicians shoot themselves in the foot trying to make sure people don't get their music for free (not illegal download). It is common practice these days for popular indie bands to feature some of their songs on a website, with perhaps a video, and some promo pics. In fact I have seen entire albums available from certain artists over the internet, that were not illegal. (I can give examples if you doubt it). What makes electronic musicians with a small bit of success feel the need to not use this powerful marketing tool?
Anyway I formulated some opinions, but none of them are solid, please feel free to add to/correct my list of reasons.
a. Electronic music is less defined generally, and easier to rip off intellectually. Hence the artist may feel less inclined to put unreleased/demo's on the internet for fear that someone may make a copy and claim it as their own, and without much legal protection it would be hard to prove ownership in a court of law, especially internationally.
b. Artists feel that they are being ripped off already with mp3 downloads and don't want to perpetuate the cycle by making themselves more known on the internet.
c. The artist believes that their work should be paid for, and that any free downloads would undermine that ideal.
Of course I am not talking about you bedroom musicians (i'm one also), who post their music regularly on the internet. I am talking about those of you with a bit of success and a regular fan base.
That said I am in no way complaining about this practice, I just wonder at it's logic.
Edit (poll is just a bit of humor really)
Last edited by SethAbare on Fri Dec 02, 2005 9:22 pm, edited 2 times in total.
splashtunes.com
Re: What does Richard Henke have to lose?
No, it isn't.SethAbare wrote:a typo, that is now fixedAdamJay wrote:who the hell is Richard Heneke ?
Last edited by AdamJay on Fri Dec 02, 2005 9:22 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Google result for Richard Henke...
he appears to be a Law School Professor...

so i would assume, as a law professor he has only to gain from piracy, as it is against the law.
great thread!
he appears to be a Law School Professor...

so i would assume, as a law professor he has only to gain from piracy, as it is against the law.
great thread!
dapper young chap there...AdamJay wrote:Google result for Richard Henke...
he appears to be a Law School Professor...
so i would assume, as a law professor he has only to gain from piracy, as it is against the law.
great thread!
Back to topic please
splashtunes.com
-
Robert Henke
- Posts: 1193
- Joined: Fri Jun 04, 2004 10:38 am
- Location: Berlin
You listen to that?Robert Henke wrote:http://www.monolake.de/freemusic/free_in_chile.mp3
splashtunes.com
So is it a three MPfree or ? i don't get it.................
anyway, here it is the free Mp3..
15" Macbook Pro 2,3 quadcore I7 2012/8gb ram/240gb SSD/ LIVE 9.06/OSX 10.8.5, NI Komplete audio 6
https://www.facebook.com/commuterofficial
http://soundcloud.com/commuter
https://www.facebook.com/commuterofficial
http://soundcloud.com/commuter
Re: What does Robert Henke have to lose?
you can preview all the tracks from 6 different Monolake releases in the iTunes Music Store.SethAbare wrote:...
and you need to go outside, take a walk, find a girlfriend... something.