More evidence that the MacBook Pro kicks ass...

Discuss music production with Ableton Live.
AdamJay
Posts: 4757
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 7:17 pm
Location: Indianapolis, USA

More evidence that the MacBook Pro kicks ass...

Post by AdamJay » Fri Mar 31, 2006 5:25 am

Orren Merton, Author of various books on Logic and Garageband, has posted some benchmarks he did with regards to the hard disk streaming on the new Intel Macs...

Now of course these tests were done in Logic, but a test such as this that measures disk limitations with audio can be applied to other applications (like LIVE), as well.

http://gearslutz.com/board/showpost.php ... stcount=27

-----------------
I just wanted to point out that the Intel architecture doesn't just rock as far as speed goes, but also disk I/O. It's been clear for a long time that something about Apple's PowerPC architecture just isn't as conducive to streaming massive amounts of audio tracks as a PC. Also, Logic favors CPU integrity over track count, so Logic tends to get conservative track counts itself.

But I ran a test to see how many unique, 24-bit, 44.1kHz stereo tracks I could stream before overloading the Disk Performance meter in Logic 7.2. Audio buffer was 1024, Large Disk Buffer was NOT checked. OS X 10.4.5.

On my G5 Dual 2.0GHz PowerMac, 2.5GB RAM, with the audio streaming off an internal 2nd drive (7200RPM 120GB SATA), I was able to stream 56 stereo 24/4.1 tracks before overload.
On my MacBook Pro Core Duo 2.0GHz, 1 GB RAM, with the audio streaming of the internal system drive (7200RPM 100GB SATA) I was able to stream 78 stereo 24/44.1 tracks before overload.

THAT, my friends, kicks all ass. We can get outboard processors and Node computers to augment CPU, but the main machine has to be able to handle the track count. It looks like with the Intel architecture (or the way OS X works on Intel, at least), the main computer will have more track capability than the previous machines.

These are good days for the Macintosh! :)

Orren

-------------

thats 40% more tracks!!!!

Personally, i'd love to see how an intel mac with stock 5400rpm (mini or macbook) fairs with reading AND writing from hard disk against a PPC mac with 7200rpm.
I'd imagine it would be very close, and would make the stock 5400rpm drives on Mac Mini's not as much of a shortcoming as many of us think.

So if anyone has an Intel Mac w/ 5400rpm and a PPC Mac w/ 7200rpm... it'd be great to hear how they compare with track counts.

thx1138
Posts: 676
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2005 9:03 am

Post by thx1138 » Fri Mar 31, 2006 6:42 am

Moisture :P
Macbook Pro C2D2.5 17"/4G/OSX.5.6/Live8.12/Brain/Bla bla bla bla

Digi V
Posts: 580
Joined: Thu Feb 09, 2006 4:18 am

Post by Digi V » Fri Mar 31, 2006 7:19 am

who would have thought intel could bring this much greatness to apple?

mikHATz
Posts: 180
Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2004 3:25 am
Location: NY,NY,NY

Post by mikHATz » Fri Mar 31, 2006 7:32 am

Digi V wrote:who would have thought intel could bring this much greatness to apple?
OR
Who would have thought apple would let intel bring this much greatness to apple

Digi V
Posts: 580
Joined: Thu Feb 09, 2006 4:18 am

Post by Digi V » Fri Mar 31, 2006 7:42 am

yeah, well i remember hearing the roomers long ago when Steve came back to the company there were talks about them switching to Intel.


IBM and freescale managed to trick his ass in resigning the deal for the PowerPc.

sweetjesus
Posts: 8803
Joined: Wed Mar 31, 2004 3:12 pm
Location: www.fridge.net.au
Contact:

Post by sweetjesus » Fri Mar 31, 2006 8:06 am

mikHATz wrote:
Digi V wrote:who would have thought intel could bring this much greatness to apple?
OR
Who would have thought apple would let intel bring this much greatness to apple
who would have thought apple users who spent decades saying that their power pc's are fast as intel chips would be so humble...

hambone1
Posts: 5346
Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2005 8:31 pm
Location: Abu Dhabi

Post by hambone1 » Fri Mar 31, 2006 8:07 am

Or that some Peecee users who slammed Macs are buying Apple now...

mikHATz
Posts: 180
Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2004 3:25 am
Location: NY,NY,NY

Post by mikHATz » Fri Mar 31, 2006 8:10 am

sweetjesus wrote:
mikHATz wrote:
Digi V wrote:who would have thought intel could bring this much greatness to apple?
OR
Who would have thought apple would let intel bring this much greatness to apple
who would have thought apple users who spent decades saying that their power pc's are fast as intel chips would be so humble...

Hell yeah, the day that apple announced the intel switch so many PPC G5 heads were psyched about apples decision. It was almost spooky in a "what if they told you to jump off the brooklyn bridge" type of way. Fun Stuff!!
MIK

FORMAT
Posts: 1776
Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2002 12:13 pm
Contact:

Post by FORMAT » Fri Mar 31, 2006 11:48 am

;-)

forge
Posts: 17422
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2004 9:47 am
Location: Queensland, AU
Contact:

Post by forge » Fri Mar 31, 2006 12:20 pm

anybody want to give me one?

Pitch Black
Posts: 6722
Joined: Sat Dec 21, 2002 2:18 am
Location: New Zealand
Contact:

Post by Pitch Black » Fri Mar 31, 2006 12:25 pm

wrong forum, mate. 8O

forge
Posts: 17422
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2004 9:47 am
Location: Queensland, AU
Contact:

Post by forge » Fri Mar 31, 2006 12:29 pm

:lol:

what was that one in the joke thread?...woman walks into a bar and asks the barman for a double entendre, so he gave her one!"

I loved that one!!! :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

hoffman2k
Posts: 14718
Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2004 6:40 pm
Location: Belgium
Contact:

Post by hoffman2k » Fri Mar 31, 2006 12:29 pm

Stop wrubbing it in already :!:

Bastards :lol:

You guys will break me long before Live 6 comes out to kick my dual g5 to the curb. ;)

stallos
Posts: 669
Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2004 4:35 pm
Location: Amsterdam
Contact:

Post by stallos » Fri Mar 31, 2006 1:59 pm

PCs are still better tho, right?

he he he - sorry its friday and I'm feeling a bit cheeky!

:wink:

Digi V
Posts: 580
Joined: Thu Feb 09, 2006 4:18 am

Post by Digi V » Fri Mar 31, 2006 3:04 pm

i loved the PowerPC arch, no doubt it's a beautiful one.

hey the g5 is still a monster chip BUT IBM could not provide low consumption cpu's man. what did you want from the apple community? "no no , no intel switch, lets wait another 3 or 4 years for a g5 powerbook"

FTHAT!

Post Reply