Is it better to master before or after mixdown?

Discuss music production with Ableton Live.
Post Reply
Svetla
Posts: 73
Joined: Sat Mar 10, 2007 3:17 pm

Is it better to master before or after mixdown?

Post by Svetla » Mon Sep 10, 2007 8:00 pm

Is it better to render the track first and then open the rendered file in a new project and to put themastering plugins in there, or will it be the same result if i just put the mastering plugs on the master channel of my track before its rendered?

glu
Posts: 2769
Joined: Thu May 19, 2005 12:27 am

Post by glu » Mon Sep 10, 2007 8:01 pm

mix
render
master
dither

in that order
no prevailing genre of music:
http://alonetone.com/glu

jesQuick
Posts: 444
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 10:36 am
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Contact:

Post by jesQuick » Mon Sep 10, 2007 8:02 pm

Try and do an A/B test... I'm curious too... Maybe post the 2 files...?!

In theory there shouldn't be any difference... Right...?

Best

-j

Michael-SW
Posts: 2054
Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 4:05 pm
Location: Stockholm, Sweden

Post by Michael-SW » Mon Sep 10, 2007 8:25 pm

If you have CPU to spare, there shouldn't be any difference. Personally, I prefer to do my feeble attempts to do "mastering" on a rendered file.

Partially to have as much CPU as I want, partially because it is much easier to set up A/B listening with approximately equal levels (important!) when I work on a rendered file.

This is how I do: Open a empty live set, create two audio tracks. Import rendered file in both tracks (no warping!) in Arrangement. Set up plugs on one track. Assign to each side of cross fader, assign crossfader to midi knob. Fiddle around with plugs. Adjust volume on clean track so it is at least as loud as processed track. Close you eyes. Twist midi knob and try to forget which track is mastered and which is not. Listen. Fiddle with plugs. Listen. Etc. Even better if you can get someone else to twist the knob so you can do true A/B listening.

Remember that louder always sounds better, so overcompensate on the clean track a bit.

Tarekith
Posts: 19140
Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2005 11:46 pm
Contact:

Post by Tarekith » Mon Sep 10, 2007 8:26 pm

Either way is fine. I tend to like using a seperate app, for reasons I will explain in a new thread shortly.

nebulae
Posts: 15717
Joined: Tue Sep 07, 2004 12:16 am
Location: New Orleans
Contact:

Post by nebulae » Mon Sep 10, 2007 8:38 pm

Different purposes require different approaches:

1. If I'm doing a on-off...meaning that the song I'm outputting will go on a site as a single, and I've got CPU to spare, I'll just put the mastering plugs on the master bus and just render it straight. Careful not to do this until the end of production because good mastering limiters will add latency, so you'll have to deal with delay, as well as inaccurate levels of what you hear if the mastering limiter is in the mastering chain before you're ready to mix down. I tend to do a lot of experimenting and adding stuff to my mixes, then when ready to mixdown, I add the mastering plugs, but only after I've got a reasonalby good mix already. Always always fix in the mix when possible, rather than doing broad sweeps in the master.

2. If I do a bunch of songs, then I usually render with just gentle limiting on the master bus, just to catch any really big peaks. Then I take all the songs I need to master for the album/ep/compilation, and I get them to sound fairly similar in their loudness and overall timbre. Meaning you don't want the listener to have to reach for the volume knob as they listen to the project, and you don't want them to turn the brightness down or up from one song to the next...and of course, you don't want the user to get hearing fatigue with overly compressed audio. I usually do this in a seperate session with all the mixdowns. I can do this in Live or any other app. If in Live, make sure warping is off when you import the files into your Live session.

Post Reply