with the titles of the scenes. A lot easier to things later on in session view.
I am using a midi track with dummy clips instead but its a lot of extra work.
Master track in Arrangement
-
John Daminato
- Posts: 103
- Joined: Sun Jan 19, 2003 6:59 pm
- Location: chicago
- Contact:
I think I know what your saying. Why wouldnt you use the markers and tag them with any information you want?
"Everybody is right in some way"
http://WWW.JOHNDAMINATO.COM http://www.myspace.com/daminato
i920 radiator cooled, hyper threaded, 7gigs-1333ram, Wndws 7,RMEfireface,UAD, bla bla
http://WWW.JOHNDAMINATO.COM http://www.myspace.com/daminato
i920 radiator cooled, hyper threaded, 7gigs-1333ram, Wndws 7,RMEfireface,UAD, bla bla
-
baseinstinct
- Posts: 942
- Joined: Sun Feb 24, 2008 3:45 am
Using marklers would interfere with what they are much better for, IMO, like triggering in arrangement view.
The option I propoze would apply each time you record a scene. In a complex arrangement you would instantly know which scene is where, without copying and pasting the markers first. Besides, when furthert editing a scene in arrangement, f.e. cutting the beginning you lose markers.
Also when duplicating the scene in arrangement or copying/pasting, you may not want to increase the no of markers.
I think markers are needed for a different kind of applications.
The option I propoze would apply each time you record a scene. In a complex arrangement you would instantly know which scene is where, without copying and pasting the markers first. Besides, when furthert editing a scene in arrangement, f.e. cutting the beginning you lose markers.
Also when duplicating the scene in arrangement or copying/pasting, you may not want to increase the no of markers.
I think markers are needed for a different kind of applications.