Dj'ing with Able
Dj'ing with Able
Ok Its three in the morning im new to ableton and i figured out the warping now how do i get one track to come in on time with the end of the one that is playin? Its probably been asked, but hey doesnt hurt. To clarify when one track is ending and i would like to mix in another....... everytime i try to do so it comes in off beet. Not like if you were to start them together. I feel as though im learning to dj all over again. 
Chikara, this used to screw me up as well...
I would think I ahd the track prefectly warped, and it wouldn't come in on time. Really frustrating...
What I do is have the quantise set to 1/4 of a bar. that way if you want to mix in on the off beat or somehting unusual you can do it. Some tracks are written bizarrely, and when you mix in won't work to plan (maybe they have some strange arrangement at the start of the track... whatever...) Anyway, this method seems to work for me. What it does mean though, is that you need to be pretty good when you cue in a track - becasue you don't have the liberty of cue a clip almost a bar early...
Maybe this will help...
Lowride
I would think I ahd the track prefectly warped, and it wouldn't come in on time. Really frustrating...
What I do is have the quantise set to 1/4 of a bar. that way if you want to mix in on the off beat or somehting unusual you can do it. Some tracks are written bizarrely, and when you mix in won't work to plan (maybe they have some strange arrangement at the start of the track... whatever...) Anyway, this method seems to work for me. What it does mean though, is that you need to be pretty good when you cue in a track - becasue you don't have the liberty of cue a clip almost a bar early...
Maybe this will help...
Lowride
Another thing you could try is taking a warped track, copy and paste a few (as many as needed) instances of it, and set different loop points for each instance. That way, you can progress through the intro, main beat, breakdown etc. when YOU want, and are not bound by track length and structure. AdamJay (I think) posted a good thread about this cutting down on disk space taken up too, as you dont need the whole track if it is fairly repetitive, just a couple of bars.
This works great for mixing one track into another, as you can set say an 8, 16, whatever you like bar loop at the outro and mix the other track in over the top, maybe even looping the intro of that track until you want that track to drop.....resulting in wild and crazy dancefloor mayhem etc. etc.
Think outside the box w/ live....thats what it's there for!
This works great for mixing one track into another, as you can set say an 8, 16, whatever you like bar loop at the outro and mix the other track in over the top, maybe even looping the intro of that track until you want that track to drop.....resulting in wild and crazy dancefloor mayhem etc. etc.
Think outside the box w/ live....thats what it's there for!
half a man walks with no shadow
So, I thought about importing multiple copies and setting up different loops all by myself (i'm a big boy). But, I'm wondering: will this take up substantially more RAM? I don't know how Ableton chooses to load things into RAM (other than the button).
and if your answer is RTFM, i'd appreciate a section number, 'cuz that thing is long
and if your answer is RTFM, i'd appreciate a section number, 'cuz that thing is long
If only you, me and DEAD people could read hex, would we need this forum?
I set up two columns in Live, which makes it easy to cross-fade from one tune into another. Just make sure you erase the stop box (Apple-E), or the first track will stop when the second starts. And the tempos should be close, or you'll hear the first track jump to the second track's tempo when you trigger the scene.
Another cool thing is to launch a second clip as a scene with the tempo input into the last column. If the tracks are warp-markered well, and the start and end points are on the downbeat and quantization set to one bar, just launch the new scene any time during a bar of the previous song, and the new song with it's new tempo will launch in perfect timing at the start of the next bar.
I also loop many intros and let them play through a second set of PA speakers in the rear of the room while the main track plays through the main PA.
You definitely need to think outside the box to get the most out of Live. That's what makes it so cool.
Another cool thing is to launch a second clip as a scene with the tempo input into the last column. If the tracks are warp-markered well, and the start and end points are on the downbeat and quantization set to one bar, just launch the new scene any time during a bar of the previous song, and the new song with it's new tempo will launch in perfect timing at the start of the next bar.
I also loop many intros and let them play through a second set of PA speakers in the rear of the room while the main track plays through the main PA.
You definitely need to think outside the box to get the most out of Live. That's what makes it so cool.
-
Michael-SW
- Posts: 2054
- Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 4:05 pm
- Location: Stockholm, Sweden
I'm guessing that it wouldn't take any more memory at all. As long as you use the same base sample and just set different loop points in different copies it should only use one copy of the actual sample. (If you cut your track in arrangement view you will actually end up with the same sample, just different loops.)
If you consolidate to new clips, you will get multiple copies, but they will on the other hand be smaller.
If you consolidate to new clips, you will get multiple copies, but they will on the other hand be smaller.
-
hacktheplanet
- Posts: 2846
- Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2004 6:37 am
- Location: Chicago, IL
- Contact:
