
if you had a point to make about bitwig, you lost it a few pages ago, so why not, for we retards, restate it in twitter format (thats 140 characters, if that reference is too 'out there')

You kinda don't deserve this, because you haven't actually bothered me... but I'm kinda confused; why have u put quotes on 'out there' and 'winning'?? I think you may be seeing text that isn't there.simmerdown wrote:you counted those? wow, you are super
but by 'winning', you lose...like charlie sheen

simpli.cissimus wrote:This here is the only DAW-related forum that has such stupid hard-core idiots as users.
Without brain and no common sense how to have a constructive discussion.
Who don't know how to accept and allow someones thoughts.
No, proving that you've done something as complex as Ableton is what would 'prove' that it is within the realm of possibility. That's cool you own a software company (seriously), and if that's the case, then you obviously do know about building software and the work it takes. Which is why it surprises me about what you say. If you own a software company then you know that it's not a linear relationship between lines of code to update and how much time it takes. The larger and more complex a program becomes, the more amount of time it takes to do small things that would take a shorter time with a smaller or freshly built program.sdfak1234 wrote: It is a small company. I'm not going to prove anything to you. To prove that statement is true I'd have to actually do it, which of course I'm not willing to do...(obviously what a retarded comment?)
Fair enough. I think you're wrong, and you don't. Life goes on.I think you guys have taken this a little bit too far, I do vaguely know what is involved in such a project and I BELIEVE I could do it, I could be wrong, to think that I could even make that statement with 100% certainly is absolutely stupid, and by the way, any software developer would know that... I never thought anyone would take that 100% literally. I am however 100% certain that I could've made the Live 9 updates in 3 years... please don't bother arguing this point any further because it's OBVIOUSLY POINTLESS.
I'm not denying that three years is a long time for these updates. But there's also a difference between a purely software writing business, and a business that has other obligations. Who knows, maybe there were times where Ableton had to scale back programmers for the sake of some other aspect of their business. Or who knows, maybe Push took coding time away from the main program for longer than they thought. Or who knows whatever else happened. I don't, and neither do you."just enough to sound like you do, but you really don't".. well that's going to be helpful on a forum huh? this is where I say what your saying is BS. "insulting comment" how the fuck is that insulting? 3 years would be enough for most software projects, there are companies that write entire operating systems in that time.
Hmm, I don't recall addressing much more than directly what you were saying. Either way, when someone seems to get personal or snarky (in a positive or negative way) over a software update, then that person needs to re-prioritize where they direct their emotion. That's my opinion anyway.See what you're doing here is that stupid ad hominem shit again, instead of addressing the argument and the issue at hand, you're focusing on something that isn't even relevant and thinking that somehow makes all my statements false, get the fuck out of here. Wasting my time.
simpli.cissimus wrote:This here is the only DAW-related forum that has such stupid hard-core idiots as users
dude, i think someone hacked your signature, they put a stupid gif, and some small-minded, presumptive text. i suggest you contact admin right awaysimpli.cissimus wrote: Posting pictures ! (of their inner state...)
Here is the place where they "Live"...
this.Donnie wrote:BTW...bitwig = unicorn. Something tells me that this mythical beast is going to fly in with a broken wing and a bum leg. I'll consider it when it can be shown to be as stable as live in a live environment. Until then the argument is just a time waster at best.
sdfak1234 wrote:Quote me or shut the fuck up little boy.
sdfak1234 wrote:Philosophy 103: Introduction to Logic
Argumentum Ad Hominem
Abstract: The argument concerning the attack of a person's character or circumstances is characterized and shown to be sometimes persuasive but normally fallacious.
sdfak1234 wrote:I'm not going to get into any kind of any arguments about what I am or not because that would be argumentum ad hominem (some people here need to learn about this).
sdfak1234 wrote:I know man, most of these kids are fucking retarded,
sdfak1234 wrote:Double Hint: You can go fuck yourself as well stringtapper
sdfak1234 wrote:go fuck yourself simmerdown.
sdfak1234 wrote:I don't "like" it, it's not out yet, I will reserve my judgement which is what I think everyone should do....
sdfak1234 wrote:Bitwig looks infinitely more modern and forward thinking, and accommodating to the new needs of audio professionals.
sdfak1234 wrote:and yes it looks like a bunch of upstarts (Bitwig) are in fact doing better, regardless of how hard that is to believe. I'm just wondering if Bitwig really do blow the doors off Ableton, will people finally then accept that Ableton has ground to a halt?