Live 9, 32 or 64bit install?

Discuss music production with Ableton Live.
vinz89
Posts: 44
Joined: Sun Oct 28, 2012 3:31 pm

Live 9, 32 or 64bit install?

Post by vinz89 » Fri Mar 01, 2013 10:17 am

Hi everybody,

I'm currently using Live Suite 8 32bit on mac osx (MBP) with 4Gb of RAM.
I use third party plugs in VST 32 bit format. Just a few of them are 64bit compatible.

My question is, when Live 9 is out next week, should i install the 64 bit version and try a bridging solution to be able to use them or should i stay with the 32 bit version of Live 9?
In other word, when you only have 4Gb of RAM on your system, is there a benefit of using the 64bit version of Live instead of the 32bit version (in terms of stability, cpu usage or other)?

Thanks for your replies
Cheers
Vinz

CFM
Posts: 230
Joined: Wed May 12, 2010 2:14 pm

Re: Live 9, 32 or 64bit install?

Post by CFM » Fri Mar 01, 2013 11:08 am

If they are sensible like Cakewalk Sonar you should be able to use 32 bit plugins under 64 bit. Beta testers should be able to tell us.

Szuumm
Posts: 209
Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2008 12:05 pm

Re: Live 9, 32 or 64bit install?

Post by Szuumm » Fri Mar 01, 2013 11:11 am

There is no built-in bridge & currently no plans to make one.

pepezabala
Posts: 3503
Joined: Mon Jun 07, 2004 4:29 pm
Location: In Berlin, finally

Re: Live 9, 32 or 64bit install?

Post by pepezabala » Fri Mar 01, 2013 11:15 am

If you don't have more than 4 GB Ram you have no advantage of using the 64bit version.

Get more RAM, then the 64bit version will be better for big livesets. For small livesets there is no difference. Only the disadvantage that some of your VSTs won't run.

vinz89
Posts: 44
Joined: Sun Oct 28, 2012 3:31 pm

Re: Live 9, 32 or 64bit install?

Post by vinz89 » Fri Mar 01, 2013 12:59 pm

Ok thanks,

I asked that because i read on the internet that the 64bit version used less CPU than the 32bit version when used with a 64bit Os and CPU like mine (i'm on MBP quadcore i7 with osx 10.8.2) and that it was more stable than the 32bit version...

Thanks anyway i think i will stay with the 32bit version...

vinz89
Posts: 44
Joined: Sun Oct 28, 2012 3:31 pm

Re: Live 9, 32 or 64bit install?

Post by vinz89 » Fri Mar 01, 2013 2:17 pm

Just figured out this article on the ableton website: https://www.ableton.com/en/articles/64bit-myths-facts/

Answered to all my questions on the subject...

Cheers

re:dream
Posts: 4598
Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2007 9:42 am
Location: Hoerikwaggo's sunset side...
Contact:

Re: Live 9, 32 or 64bit install?

Post by re:dream » Fri Mar 01, 2013 2:59 pm

Does a 'bridge' add latency?

Evengy
Posts: 454
Joined: Wed Jan 13, 2010 8:31 am

Re: Live 9, 32 or 64bit install?

Post by Evengy » Fri Mar 01, 2013 3:34 pm

quiet_ou wrote:Does a 'bridge' add latency?
im not 100% sure but i think yes from a the technical side because of the translation from 32 to 64 bit. and i think it´s minimal so that you never notice this latency ;)

Ableton says: It is to be expected that a plug-in translated in this manner will never run as dependably as a 32-bit plug-in in a 32-bit host or a true 64-bit plug-in in a 64-bit host.
source: https://www.ableton.com/en/articles/64bit-myths-facts/

Sibanger
Posts: 2235
Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 7:44 am
Location: Melbourne/Australia
Contact:

Re: Live 9, 32 or 64bit install?

Post by Sibanger » Sat Mar 02, 2013 1:08 am

pepezabala wrote:If you don't have more than 4 GB Ram you have no advantage of using the 64bit version.

Get more RAM, then the 64bit version will be better for big livesets. For small livesets there is no difference. Only the disadvantage that some of your VSTs won't run.
Edit: removed post because I need to get my eyes checked.
Last edited by Sibanger on Mon Mar 04, 2013 2:45 am, edited 1 time in total.

alexjholland
Posts: 300
Joined: Sat Apr 11, 2009 12:22 am
Location: Cambridge, UK
Contact:

Re: Live 9, 32 or 64bit install?

Post by alexjholland » Sat Mar 02, 2013 2:16 am

So even with my quad-core i7 27" iMac with 12Gb of RAM, it doesn't sound like I will gain any benefits from installing 64-bit?

I don't have any issues with crashing so far.

Pasha
Posts: 3335
Joined: Tue Dec 27, 2005 12:45 pm
Location: Lost Island
Contact:

Re: Live 9, 32 or 64bit install?

Post by Pasha » Sat Mar 02, 2013 7:18 am

Evengy wrote:
quiet_ou wrote:Does a 'bridge' add latency?
im not 100% sure but i think yes from a the technical side because of the translation from 32 to 64 bit. and i think it´s minimal so that you never notice this latency ;)

Ableton says: It is to be expected that a plug-in translated in this manner will never run as dependably as a 32-bit plug-in in a 32-bit host or a true 64-bit plug-in in a 64-bit host.
source: https://www.ableton.com/en/articles/64bit-myths-facts/
Thank you. This solved my question even before I posted it! :D Ableton enabled mind reading..
Mac Studio M1
Live 12 Suite,Zebra ,Valhalla Plugins, MIDI Guitar (2+3),Guitar, Bass, VG99, GP10, JV1010 and some controllers
______________________________________
Music : http://alonetone.com/pasha

chris vine
Posts: 698
Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2005 2:01 am
Location: Brazil

Re: Live 9, 32 or 64bit install?

Post by chris vine » Mon Mar 04, 2013 1:55 am

+ if you have M4L, it won't work on 64 Bit.
I am staying on 32bit then :P

artpunk
Posts: 541
Joined: Mon Feb 06, 2012 1:51 am
Location: The Antipodes
Contact:

Re: Live 9, 32 or 64bit install?

Post by artpunk » Mon Mar 04, 2013 2:32 am

chris vine wrote:
+ if you have M4L, it won't work on 64 Bit.
I am staying on 32bit then :P
Max For Live for Live 9 Suite is based on Max 6 which is 64-bit I'm fairly sure...
https://www.ableton.com/en/live/max-for-live/

So that particular bit of info you are basing your decisions on is leading you astray... If you've made any patches in Max 5 I am not sure how well they will work in Max 6 however....

Don't believe everything you read in the forums (what I've just told you could be wrong) it's best to do your own research too.
:D
Last edited by artpunk on Mon Mar 04, 2013 2:43 am, edited 1 time in total.

“... it was just to make an average listener go: ‘What the fuck is this?’ That’s a real inspiration for me and something that I will explore more on upcoming recordings.”
- Wally De Backer (Gotye) quoting Ween's intention behind making records

Sibanger
Posts: 2235
Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 7:44 am
Location: Melbourne/Australia
Contact:

Re: Live 9, 32 or 64bit install?

Post by Sibanger » Mon Mar 04, 2013 2:43 am

^^ Sorry, I didn't even look at the post. Thought we were talking about The 8.4 version of Live.

:lol:

Don't believe a word I say !!!!

artpunk
Posts: 541
Joined: Mon Feb 06, 2012 1:51 am
Location: The Antipodes
Contact:

Re: Live 9, 32 or 64bit install?

Post by artpunk » Mon Mar 04, 2013 2:44 am

Sibanger wrote:^^ Sorry, I didn't even look at the post. Thought we were talking about The 8.4 version of Live.

:lol:

Don't believe a word I say !!!!
:D -or me neither!

Oh another thing I wanted to mention for the OP is that he can have both versions of Live 9 installed, I have both the 32-bit & 64-bit Live 9 beta's.
...and for Max 6 you can choose to open it in 32-bit or 64-bit...

“... it was just to make an average listener go: ‘What the fuck is this?’ That’s a real inspiration for me and something that I will explore more on upcoming recordings.”
- Wally De Backer (Gotye) quoting Ween's intention behind making records

Post Reply