64-bit vs. 32-bit user count
Re: 64-bit vs. 32-bit user count
i'd love to see the results of this poll, but i'm not voting with no 'Both' option... since i have both
after all the fucking pathetic whining from the 500 people on the forum demanding 64 bit from Live while only 492 of them actually needed it... there is no way i'm ticking off 64 bit to somehow justify their pointless grass-is-greener bemoaning.
after all the fucking pathetic whining from the 500 people on the forum demanding 64 bit from Live while only 492 of them actually needed it... there is no way i'm ticking off 64 bit to somehow justify their pointless grass-is-greener bemoaning.
LoopStationZebra wrote:it's like a hipster commie pinko manifesto. Rambling. Angry. Nearly divorced from all reality; yet strangely compelling with a ring of truth.
Re: 64-bit vs. 32-bit user count
Ya. I wasn't even aware that one could run both on the same machine. My bad. But ya, I feel ya. I seem to remember reading a shit load of posts on that subject from some very disgruntled users. lol. I let you know how the tally comes out.H20nly wrote:i'd love to see the results of this poll, but i'm not voting with no 'Both' option... since i have both
after all the fucking pathetic whining from the 500 people on the forum demanding 64 bit from Live while only 492 of them actually needed it... there is no way i'm ticking off 64 bit to somehow justify their pointless grass-is-greener bemoaning.
Re: 64-bit vs. 32-bit user count
thanks... i caved and voted 64 bit because even though my laptop can handle anything you throw at it, my iMac is my main DAW, 64 bit, and loaded with 20 GB of RAM... for that quad core i5 @ 3.1 GhzTheo Void wrote:Ya. I wasn't even aware that one could run both on the same machine. My bad. But ya, I feel ya. I seem to remember reading a shit load of posts on that subject from some very disgruntled users. lol. I let you know how the tally comes out.H20nly wrote:i'd love to see the results of this poll, but i'm not voting with no 'Both' option... since i have both
after all the fucking pathetic whining from the 500 people on the forum demanding 64 bit from Live while only 492 of them actually needed it... there is no way i'm ticking off 64 bit to somehow justify their pointless grass-is-greener bemoaning.
Re: 64-bit vs. 32-bit user count
Dude, if I had RAM like that I wouldn't think twice about 64. My Macbook is a 2.2 ghZ i7 w/ 8 Gb. RAM so I'm sure 64 would help a bit but I'm still questioning it for some reason.H20nly wrote:thanks... i caved and voted 64 bit because even though my laptop can handle anything you throw at it, my iMac is my main DAW, 64 bit, and loaded with 20 GB of RAM... for that quad core i5 @ 3.1 GhzTheo Void wrote:Ya. I wasn't even aware that one could run both on the same machine. My bad. But ya, I feel ya. I seem to remember reading a shit load of posts on that subject from some very disgruntled users. lol. I let you know how the tally comes out.H20nly wrote:i'd love to see the results of this poll, but i'm not voting with no 'Both' option... since i have both
after all the fucking pathetic whining from the 500 people on the forum demanding 64 bit from Live while only 492 of them actually needed it... there is no way i'm ticking off 64 bit to somehow justify their pointless grass-is-greener bemoaning.
Re: 64-bit vs. 32-bit user count
Ummm, just click "view results" under the vote/submit buttonH20nly wrote:i'd love to see the results of this poll..
Re: 64-bit vs. 32-bit user count
why are you getting all technical on me?UncleAge wrote:Ummm, just click "view results" under the vote/submit buttonH20nly wrote:i'd love to see the results of this poll..
Re: 64-bit vs. 32-bit user count
lol.......I thought maybe only I could see the results or some shit. Lol......H20nly wrote:why are you getting all technical on me?UncleAge wrote:Ummm, just click "view results" under the vote/submit buttonH20nly wrote:i'd love to see the results of this poll..
Anyway, we're at 54% 64 and 46% 32 ot of 83 votes.
Re: 64-bit vs. 32-bit user count
damn it Theo! aren't you supposed to be in one thread in The Lounge for the rest of time?

Re: 64-bit vs. 32-bit user count
your poll is likely inaccurate.
64 bit users went the extra step to migrate and would have an interest in this topic. people that don't care about 64 bit would likely be more interested in this thread. as it is now 64 bit is ahead in the count. Do you think that's accurate? 64 bit bit users could also be more geeky in general and be more likely to use the forum.
32 bit. if it ain't broke...
64 bit users went the extra step to migrate and would have an interest in this topic. people that don't care about 64 bit would likely be more interested in this thread. as it is now 64 bit is ahead in the count. Do you think that's accurate? 64 bit bit users could also be more geeky in general and be more likely to use the forum.
32 bit. if it ain't broke...
In my life
Why do I smile
At people who I'd much rather kick in the eye?
-Moz
Why do I smile
At people who I'd much rather kick in the eye?
-Moz
Re: 64-bit vs. 32-bit user count
using both here. i have some vsts that are only 32bit. also when using heavy sample libraries in kontakt and omnisphere 64bit is a necessity.
Re: 64-bit vs. 32-bit user count
I'm using 32-bit, because I still need to use Sylenth a lot, which is 32-bit only.
Soundcloud: http://soundcloud.com/rimby
i7-3770K 3.5GHz
16GB RAM
256GB SSD, 1TB 7200HD
Windows 8
Live 9
i7-3770K 3.5GHz
16GB RAM
256GB SSD, 1TB 7200HD
Windows 8
Live 9
Re: 64-bit vs. 32-bit user count
I moved over to 64-bit completely on OSX, but I lost some nice editor VSTs when I did.
Gig Rig - rMBP 2.3GHZ i7, 16GB RAM, 256GB SSD, OSX 10.13.x, Presonus FS, Live 10.x
Home Rig - i9 eight-core Hackintosh 32GB DDR4, 2nd Generation Scarlett 18i20, ADA8000, JoeMeek SixQ, Live 10.x
Home Rig - i9 eight-core Hackintosh 32GB DDR4, 2nd Generation Scarlett 18i20, ADA8000, JoeMeek SixQ, Live 10.x
Re: 64-bit vs. 32-bit user count
After getting a few crashes on 64 Bit & sending off reports to Abes, this was the reply-
So, I have been running 32 Bit since.
It's good to know if I run a project using a lot of RAM, I can still use 64 Bit version.
( PC/Win 7 )The error message in your screenshot is related to a general 64-bit floating point exception. As your memory usage is quite low, it doesn't seem necessary for you to run the 64-bit version of Live 9. I would encourage you to try using 32-bit version as in general, this is more stable.
So, I have been running 32 Bit since.
It's good to know if I run a project using a lot of RAM, I can still use 64 Bit version.