Whats An Average cpu load for your projects.

Discuss music production with Ableton Live.
The Scientist
Posts: 29
Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2005 12:54 am

Whats An Average cpu load for your projects.

Post by The Scientist » Mon Oct 10, 2005 3:05 pm

i just Live 5 this Weekemd, and i love it. i just wanted to know on the average what your cpu load is. for the few projects I've worked on this weekend it was running about 10%-15%. But I'm also running 5.0, not the update. Its been runnin fine so far. Do you guys think the new 5.02 is neccesary? and is it more stable than the initial release (5.0)? sorry for all the questions.

jeskola
Posts: 1856
Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2004 1:04 pm

Post by jeskola » Mon Oct 10, 2005 3:40 pm

static its about 30% but when i play i regulalry hit 100+ and get a big phat D. but thats a couple of instances of reaktor to blame.

Machinate
Posts: 11648
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2004 2:15 pm
Location: Denmark

Post by Machinate » Mon Oct 10, 2005 3:44 pm

used to be around 30 percent... and then I got Reaktor, now it's at 40-60... and then I add the mastering chain, which more or less maxes out the cpu
mbp 2.66, osx 10.6.8, 8GB ram.

the ar
Posts: 348
Joined: Sat May 29, 2004 11:42 am
Location: Outer Space

Post by the ar » Mon Oct 10, 2005 3:45 pm

Usually around 25/35%.
Jumps up to about 50 if I 'master' in Live, but I usually use my outboard studio gear for that.

icedsushi
Posts: 1652
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2005 8:36 pm

Post by icedsushi » Mon Oct 10, 2005 3:46 pm

I usually stay around 60-70% but I use mostly soft synths. When it gets higher than that, I render stuff so I can work more quickly.

If I want to play my stuff out, I render most of the clips and disable their track's plugins to get it below 50% for better stability and enough CPU room to play a softsynth Live.

elemental
Posts: 930
Joined: Sun Jun 20, 2004 7:42 pm
Location: London
Contact:

Post by elemental » Mon Oct 10, 2005 4:22 pm

too often aroung 80% - even after bouncing synths etc. I am considering going back to cubase, seriously, just so I can have more CPU overhead!!

I love Live, when I'm starting a tune... but too often, not even half way through writing a track I come up against high CPU, slugishness, have to put my latency right up so I can't play anything in properly .. kills inspiration!!

I'm running a 1.7Ghz Dothan P4M, 1Gb RAM.

The Scientist
Posts: 29
Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2005 12:54 am

Post by The Scientist » Mon Oct 10, 2005 5:16 pm

Dam thats pretty high. I had a set yesterday running Reason 2.5, and Acid Pro 5, with a decent size track count, effects loaded, and was only pushing about 17% with all those programs running. I'm running on a dell 9100 laptop 3.2ghz, 1 gig ram, 60 7200rpm hd.
Dell 9100 3.2ghz, 1gig ram, 60gb 7200rpm hd

www.myspace.com/dascientist

mike holiday
Posts: 2433
Joined: Mon Jun 28, 2004 8:52 pm
Location: NOW

Post by mike holiday » Mon Oct 10, 2005 5:17 pm

all the way untill it pops

sqook
Posts: 2430
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 8:14 pm
Location: Sweden
Contact:

Post by sqook » Mon Oct 10, 2005 5:32 pm

70-90, until I bounce everything down row by row (I don't like the way the freeze is implemented, just a pet-peeve). I put each instrument in its own track, so having multiple instances of trash and other fx plugins running tends to get a bit costly...

timothyallan
Posts: 5788
Joined: Wed Nov 24, 2004 11:05 pm
Location: Melbourne Australia
Contact:

Post by timothyallan » Mon Oct 10, 2005 11:49 pm

90%'s ....

Too bad that the same thing in CubaseSX is a 35%, but Live is more fun :)

-tim

purefunk
Posts: 82
Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2004 12:49 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA USA
Contact:

Post by purefunk » Tue Oct 11, 2005 1:39 pm

Rewired with Reason...

Til it can't handle any more, then I have to strip it down.

Mac Powerbook G4, 1Ghz, 2GB

ManxRed
Posts: 13
Joined: Tue Sep 27, 2005 12:29 pm

Post by ManxRed » Tue Oct 11, 2005 2:55 pm

Whoa! Thought I was pushing it at 50-odd% but I'm just a novice!

Nurse!! More softsynths!!!

marky
Posts: 577
Joined: Sat May 28, 2005 4:43 pm
Location: Boston, MA

Post by marky » Tue Oct 11, 2005 7:34 pm

My projects easily creep up to 60 - 70% with an instance of Battery 2.0, some MIDI and audio tracks with effects and a few external plugs (Hydratone, Equim, Neodynium).

So much so that I have changed my usage of Live --- I use it only for the initial composition stage. When I get a couple of minutes of the track laid out, I transfer everything to Logic Pro and rewire any Simpler/Impulse/Audio tracks into Live.

This works great for me, but pained me to do it as I like Live's workflow so much. But they really, really need to put some dual processor optimizations in there.

nebulae
Posts: 15717
Joined: Tue Sep 07, 2004 12:16 am
Location: New Orleans
Contact:

Post by nebulae » Tue Oct 11, 2005 7:50 pm

I'm not sure why there are so many CPU issues with Live. Most of my problems disappeared when I turned Hyperthreading off. I suspect that HT for PCs, and Mac issues cause many of the CPU issues. I recently did some testing and found that for the same amount of tracks with the same plugs and same settings, Live wasn't too far off from SX or Sonar, with Sonar just a bit more efficient. Just my own observations...I'm sure everyone has different findings, but so far, Live 5.02 is wonderful.

bland_handl
Posts: 239
Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2005 6:08 am
Location: sydney

Post by bland_handl » Wed Oct 12, 2005 12:50 am

Nebulae,

Can you tell us any more about Hyperthreading and how to switch it off?
And does switching it off affect use with other audio apps?
(I'm running Live on a Powerbook w. OS Tiger)

Bland

Post Reply