Whats An Average cpu load for your projects.
-
The Scientist
- Posts: 29
- Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2005 12:54 am
Whats An Average cpu load for your projects.
i just Live 5 this Weekemd, and i love it. i just wanted to know on the average what your cpu load is. for the few projects I've worked on this weekend it was running about 10%-15%. But I'm also running 5.0, not the update. Its been runnin fine so far. Do you guys think the new 5.02 is neccesary? and is it more stable than the initial release (5.0)? sorry for all the questions.
I usually stay around 60-70% but I use mostly soft synths. When it gets higher than that, I render stuff so I can work more quickly.
If I want to play my stuff out, I render most of the clips and disable their track's plugins to get it below 50% for better stability and enough CPU room to play a softsynth Live.
If I want to play my stuff out, I render most of the clips and disable their track's plugins to get it below 50% for better stability and enough CPU room to play a softsynth Live.
too often aroung 80% - even after bouncing synths etc. I am considering going back to cubase, seriously, just so I can have more CPU overhead!!
I love Live, when I'm starting a tune... but too often, not even half way through writing a track I come up against high CPU, slugishness, have to put my latency right up so I can't play anything in properly .. kills inspiration!!
I'm running a 1.7Ghz Dothan P4M, 1Gb RAM.
I love Live, when I'm starting a tune... but too often, not even half way through writing a track I come up against high CPU, slugishness, have to put my latency right up so I can't play anything in properly .. kills inspiration!!
I'm running a 1.7Ghz Dothan P4M, 1Gb RAM.
-
The Scientist
- Posts: 29
- Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2005 12:54 am
-
mike holiday
- Posts: 2433
- Joined: Mon Jun 28, 2004 8:52 pm
- Location: NOW
-
timothyallan
- Posts: 5788
- Joined: Wed Nov 24, 2004 11:05 pm
- Location: Melbourne Australia
- Contact:
My projects easily creep up to 60 - 70% with an instance of Battery 2.0, some MIDI and audio tracks with effects and a few external plugs (Hydratone, Equim, Neodynium).
So much so that I have changed my usage of Live --- I use it only for the initial composition stage. When I get a couple of minutes of the track laid out, I transfer everything to Logic Pro and rewire any Simpler/Impulse/Audio tracks into Live.
This works great for me, but pained me to do it as I like Live's workflow so much. But they really, really need to put some dual processor optimizations in there.
So much so that I have changed my usage of Live --- I use it only for the initial composition stage. When I get a couple of minutes of the track laid out, I transfer everything to Logic Pro and rewire any Simpler/Impulse/Audio tracks into Live.
This works great for me, but pained me to do it as I like Live's workflow so much. But they really, really need to put some dual processor optimizations in there.
I'm not sure why there are so many CPU issues with Live. Most of my problems disappeared when I turned Hyperthreading off. I suspect that HT for PCs, and Mac issues cause many of the CPU issues. I recently did some testing and found that for the same amount of tracks with the same plugs and same settings, Live wasn't too far off from SX or Sonar, with Sonar just a bit more efficient. Just my own observations...I'm sure everyone has different findings, but so far, Live 5.02 is wonderful.
-
bland_handl
- Posts: 239
- Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2005 6:08 am
- Location: sydney