Time Signatures

Discuss Move with other users.
su
Posts: 200
Joined: Tue Dec 15, 2009 6:09 am

Re: Time Signatures

Post by su » Mon Feb 17, 2025 9:08 am

I’m pitching in here on the off chance the Abes are reading. Count me in with the very disappointed crowd. I’d grown excited about Move but now have serious reservations given that it’s locked into 4/4.

Time signatures are a fundamental aspect of music. I’ve been using Note since it first came out as I’m a long time iOS music maker. I’m on the beta and eagerly scan the release notes for the addition of time sigs at each release , but no go.

One of the big selling points of Move to me is that it captures initial ideas quickly and naturally via live playing. Many of my ideas are in time sigs other than 4/4 rendering Note and Move severely limited

They are like a word processor that only allows you to write business memos.

chapelier fou
Posts: 6258
Joined: Mon May 15, 2006 12:15 pm

Re: Time Signatures

Post by chapelier fou » Mon Feb 17, 2025 1:20 pm

Same. It’s still here in the studio, waiting to be useful.
MacBook Pro 13" Retina i7 2.8 GHz OS 10.13, L10.0.1, M4L.
MacStudio M1Max 32Go OS 12.3.1

Curtis Fred
Posts: 2
Joined: Fri Apr 04, 2025 4:07 pm

Re: Time Signatures

Post by Curtis Fred » Fri Apr 04, 2025 4:14 pm

Plus 1 for time signatures. It's not right without them. 3/4 isn't just for waltzes. Please...

chapelier fou
Posts: 6258
Joined: Mon May 15, 2006 12:15 pm

Re: Time Signatures

Post by chapelier fou » Fri Apr 04, 2025 4:34 pm

What’s wrong with waltzes anyway ?
MacBook Pro 13" Retina i7 2.8 GHz OS 10.13, L10.0.1, M4L.
MacStudio M1Max 32Go OS 12.3.1

dontfret
Posts: 32
Joined: Fri May 08, 2020 8:58 pm

Re: Time Signatures

Post by dontfret » Fri Apr 18, 2025 5:26 pm

Time signatures are essential! I almost never use exclusively 4/4, I'm usually in 12/8 because you can do both!

braduro
Posts: 300
Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2011 12:03 am

Re: Time Signatures

Post by braduro » Mon Jun 02, 2025 6:06 pm

It may come as a surprise that I entirely agree with you, seeing as I’ve often come to the defense of the new musical practitioners on here.

The time signature argument has been clouded by presumptions, insult, provocation, and grasping theory. It’s important to remember that especially with such an accessible device we share this community with newcomers. There has been some condescension that is entirely unnecessary. A trolling if you will.

And also helpful, I hope, is that while we come from varied experiences and depths of wisdom, we are all relatively new to this device.

How would odd time signatures work with capture? Is the technology ready for it? How would divisions of 16 steps overlay? In other words, how would you manage the real estate? Like the push drum sequencer? Could you correct for your clip analysis back in live? How would you manage compound time signatures or changing time signatures? Per scene? What other groove adjustments would you include? What do you do with music that has loose time signature? Is the move the first thing you would reach for in such cases?

Maybe all folks need is a modifiable metronome and a record quantization that adjusts to time signature. Things like the Torso T1 have multiple note division and multiple page length sequences. As far as time signature, it is nonetheless agnostic.

Post Reply