if you read what I say in my proper post i have proper points. One or two words of mine were picked on because what I say is more probably true but no one comments on thatpsi wrote:whatever : this is an important issue shame its not long before the cream pies start being slapped into other's faces..
Ableton abandoning the G5 ?
I see no reason to laugh at mehoffman2k wrote:I've seen many mac threads deteriorate in many various ways....
But this one is cracking me up...
"Live doesnt do anything another software wont"![]()
tell me one thing live can do that other software cannot. Keep in your mind I talk about the end result not the method. Prove me wrong
The end result, not the method?radeon wrote:I see no reason to laugh at mehoffman2k wrote:I've seen many mac threads deteriorate in many various ways....
But this one is cracking me up...
"Live doesnt do anything another software wont"![]()
![]()
tell me one thing live can do that other software cannot. Keep in your mind I talk about the end result not the method. Prove me wrong
I guess you can compare every piece of audio software to a couple of pots to bang on and a tape recorder.....
The end result is that you will get sound.
What the hell do you even mean by end result?
Off course it's the method that count's. It's called LIVE.
All DAW's can be used to make music in. But they all handle it in a different way.
-
noisetonepause
- Posts: 4938
- Joined: Sat Dec 28, 2002 3:38 pm
- Location: Sticks and stones
-
Mike Goodwin
- Posts: 1119
- Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2005 6:29 pm
Angstrom wrote:for a small fee
whatever anstrom is charging my little sister will do it for 10% off angstroms rate. PM me.
.
--
NEW SPECS: Athlon 4200+ dual; A8N-SLI m/b; Win XP Home SP2; 1 GB RAM; 2x 7200 RPM HDD: 1 internal, 1 Firewire 800 (Firewire is project data drive); M-Audio Triggerfinger
josh 'vonster' von; tracks and sets
http://www.joshvon.com
NEW SPECS: Athlon 4200+ dual; A8N-SLI m/b; Win XP Home SP2; 1 GB RAM; 2x 7200 RPM HDD: 1 internal, 1 Firewire 800 (Firewire is project data drive); M-Audio Triggerfinger
josh 'vonster' von; tracks and sets
http://www.joshvon.com
just an observation:
everytime i see an ableton press video or demo clip i always see Robert and/or Gerhard etc. using a powerbook. i doubt ableton will abandon apple.
both companies will mutually evolve and benefit one another to some degree.
(such as the case for the last 7-8 years or whatever)
everytime i see an ableton press video or demo clip i always see Robert and/or Gerhard etc. using a powerbook. i doubt ableton will abandon apple.
both companies will mutually evolve and benefit one another to some degree.
(such as the case for the last 7-8 years or whatever)
Dave Pelman Music
http://www.davepelman.com
http://www.davepelman.com
You just answer the question but can not see ithoffman2k wrote:The end result, not the method?radeon wrote:I see no reason to laugh at mehoffman2k wrote:I've seen many mac threads deteriorate in many various ways....
But this one is cracking me up...
"Live doesnt do anything another software wont"![]()
![]()
tell me one thing live can do that other software cannot. Keep in your mind I talk about the end result not the method. Prove me wrong
I guess you can compare every piece of audio software to a couple of pots to bang on and a tape recorder.....
The end result is that you will get sound.
What the hell do you even mean by end result?
Off course it's the method that count's. It's called LIVE.
All DAW's can be used to make music in. But they all handle it in a different way.
I know we are not native english but even I understand you wrote the answer then asked the question
Still not one person has said I can do this ion live you cant do that in other sofwares
There are dozens of things you can do in Live that other DAW's cant. Follow actions and all the tricks you can pull of with it comes to mind as one example.radeon wrote:You just answer the question but can not see ithoffman2k wrote:The end result, not the method?radeon wrote: I see no reason to laugh at me![]()
tell me one thing live can do that other software cannot. Keep in your mind I talk about the end result not the method. Prove me wrong
I guess you can compare every piece of audio software to a couple of pots to bang on and a tape recorder.....
The end result is that you will get sound.
What the hell do you even mean by end result?
Off course it's the method that count's. It's called LIVE.
All DAW's can be used to make music in. But they all handle it in a different way.![]()
![]()
I know we are not native english but even I understand you wrote the answer then asked the question![]()
Still not one person has said I can do this ion live you cant do that in other sofwaresI am 100% correct see
But with end result i think you mean a song.
You can make a song on a playstation
And that was your initial question as i understand it.
The problem is not that somebody can't point out the uniqueness of Live to you.
The problem is that you can't understand it.
So no point in trying to argue with me.
Show me one DAW that has something even remotely close to Live clips
I have had my dual G5 now for a year and a half. I have also had the same two grand put aside waiting for a competitive powerbook, for about as long.Johnisfaster wrote:when us mac guys get intelbooks it'll be a non issue??????
dude the computers we are using are very capable but ableton seems to not care that their program runs sluggish at best. so the fix is to buy a new computer? fu** that we have good equipment and we bought "good" software that should work top notch all the time. I don't know about you but I don't have 2 grand laying around to buy a new laptop just so i can get ableton to run faster when it should already be working like a horse. I've only had this g4 for like 6months now I'm not buying a new computer for several years at least.
I have since lost my patience with my own impatience.
If there is ever a preformance increase for g5's I will be IMPRESSED. If there isn't eventually dual processor support, I will be SHOCKED.
Dude. These are some very different reverbs. Also: Logic is not a realtime tool in by any means. You can't even bounce two f'n tracks at the same time!radeon wrote: All you say is weird. If i make music with 2 blips i can use a 386 running 8mb ram. So you can "get stuff" done. I know your not running 30 audio tracks 6 virtual synth and tons of eq and compresor 3 space revrb with latency on which i can do easi in logic on a dual g5.
By pro 7, do they mean problematic prostate protrusions upon progressively protracting prohibitive prom-music?
As far as reverbs are concerned! Reverbs are all different things all together!
While I could concievably run one hundred instances of it on my G5 at once, I doubt that my system would be happy generating massive, dynamic, real-time adjustments to several parameters.
Also, Logic is specifically built to work effectively on a G5.
Seriously. Let's see Logic gain a universally accepted status of "stable-Live-performance-tool"hoffman2k wrote:The end result, not the method?radeon wrote:I see no reason to laugh at mehoffman2k wrote:I've seen many mac threads deteriorate in many various ways....
But this one is cracking me up...
"Live doesnt do anything another software wont"![]()
![]()
tell me one thing live can do that other software cannot. Keep in your mind I talk about the end result not the method. Prove me wrong
I guess you can compare every piece of audio software to a couple of pots to bang on and a tape recorder.....
The end result is that you will get sound.
What the hell do you even mean by end result?
Off course it's the method that count's. It's called LIVE.
All DAW's can be used to make music in. But they all handle it in a different way.
My house is bigger than yours.