MacBook Pro + Existing VSTs

Discuss music production with Ableton Live.
Groovecake
Posts: 140
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2005 10:12 pm
Location: Omaha

MacBook Pro + Existing VSTs

Post by Groovecake » Tue Feb 21, 2006 5:18 pm

Will VST instruments like the Korg Legacy and Arturia MiniMoog need to be rewritten to work on the intel Macs like Ableton does, or are these two different things?

Sorry if this is an elementary question. Thanks

hoffman2k
Posts: 14718
Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2004 6:40 pm
Location: Belgium
Contact:

Post by hoffman2k » Tue Feb 21, 2006 5:22 pm

Plugins will need a universal binary too.
There are already some available. but most developers are still working on it.

Groovecake
Posts: 140
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2005 10:12 pm
Location: Omaha

Post by Groovecake » Tue Feb 21, 2006 6:29 pm

Dang.

Will they still work only not as well or will they not work at all?

Thanks

M

warpus
Posts: 87
Joined: Tue May 10, 2005 11:35 pm

Post by warpus » Tue Feb 21, 2006 6:34 pm

Groovecake wrote:Dang.

Will they still work only not as well or will they not work at all?

Thanks

M
Not at all. The host application will not recognize them.

ToLTeK
Posts: 66
Joined: Fri Aug 20, 2004 9:05 am

Post by ToLTeK » Tue Feb 21, 2006 7:41 pm

warpus wrote:
Groovecake wrote:Dang.

Will they still work only not as well or will they not work at all?

Thanks

M
Not at all. The host application will not recognize them.
What..?!!! I am using Intel based iMac for the past four weeks and every single VST and VSTi that I have tried and installed (including Korg Legacy DE) works just fine. Sure that they suffer a little bit performance wise, but not dramaticaly. Can't say that about curent version of Live which loads, but is totaly unusable. Hopefully 5.2 will be released this week...

Groovecake
Posts: 140
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2005 10:12 pm
Location: Omaha

Post by Groovecake » Tue Feb 21, 2006 7:47 pm

Ah. That's good to know. Have you been using them as plugins or as stand alones?

ToLTeK
Posts: 66
Joined: Fri Aug 20, 2004 9:05 am

Post by ToLTeK » Tue Feb 21, 2006 9:19 pm

Groovecake wrote:Ah. That's good to know. Have you been using them as plugins or as stand alones?
Both... :D
FYI; Cubase SL3 runs OK, Reason 3 - so,so as long as you don't use "combinator" patches. As fo VSTi's - Korg Legacy, Microtonic, Vanguard, Bassline all run OK and iDrum is the first "Universal" plug for Intel Mac {AU only). Good news is that You will propably not even notice performance difference if migrated from let's say iMac G5 2GHz.

Groovecake
Posts: 140
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2005 10:12 pm
Location: Omaha

Post by Groovecake » Tue Feb 21, 2006 9:29 pm

Oh...I have a feeling I will notice a performance difference migrating from an iBook 933!! :D

FaX-01
Posts: 1483
Joined: Sat Jun 26, 2004 3:58 am

Post by FaX-01 » Tue Feb 21, 2006 9:36 pm

ToLTeK wrote:
warpus wrote:
Groovecake wrote:Dang.

Will they still work only not as well or will they not work at all?

Thanks

M
Not at all. The host application will not recognize them.
What..?!!! I am using Intel based iMac for the past four weeks and every single VST and VSTi that I have tried and installed (including Korg Legacy DE) works just fine. Sure that they suffer a little bit performance wise, but not dramaticaly. Can't say that about curent version of Live which loads, but is totaly unusable. Hopefully 5.2 will be released this week...


You are using them under ROSETTA .
You seem to have been misinformed of your current situation.
When you get a UNIVERSAL BINARY edition of your HOST (ie:LIVE) it will need to have universal binary conversions of all your VST/VSTi to run in that host.
As it currently stands your are using a non universal binary version of Live with NON universal binary versions of your VST & VSTi.
I guarantee you when you use a Universal Binary Host all the VST&VSTi and AudiUnits need to be of universal binary conversion too run effectively
.


So yes when you have a proper Univeral Binary compatible host you need to have your AU's / VST & VSTi converted to universal binary also.
My aren't the wings of butterflies beautiful and do they not make wonderful perturbations.....

Digi V
Posts: 580
Joined: Thu Feb 09, 2006 4:18 am

Post by Digi V » Wed Feb 22, 2006 1:31 am

fox- you sure? i'm going to have to look into this.

kenn michael
Posts: 239
Joined: Wed Jun 30, 2004 6:03 am
Location: Los Angeles
Contact:

Post by kenn michael » Wed Feb 22, 2006 2:17 am

yes, fax is definitely correct on this.

AdamJay
Posts: 4757
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 7:17 pm
Location: Indianapolis, USA

Post by AdamJay » Wed Feb 22, 2006 2:32 am

FaX-01...

dropping knowledge like cinder blocks!

LOFA
Posts: 3365
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 7:10 pm

Post by LOFA » Wed Feb 22, 2006 5:13 am

AdamJay wrote:FaX-01...

dropping knowledge like cinder blocks!
:lol:

forge
Posts: 17422
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2004 9:47 am
Location: Queensland, AU
Contact:

Post by forge » Wed Feb 22, 2006 5:19 am

I have it on GOOD authority that the uni-bin "rewrite" is actually not a big deal at all hence why L5.2 is coming out so soon

so I wouldnt stress too much

ToLTeK
Posts: 66
Joined: Fri Aug 20, 2004 9:05 am

Post by ToLTeK » Wed Feb 22, 2006 10:49 am

Hey FaX-01,
You have mentioned:
"So yes when you have a proper Univeral Binary compatible host you need to have your AU's / VST & VSTi converted to universal binary also."
So if that's the case, shouldn't opposite be true i.e you can't use "Universal" VSTi's with Host running under Rosetta? The reason I'm asking is that the only Universal VSTi I know of at this stage - Crystal, performs flawlesly in Cubase running under Rosetta...

Post Reply