that's a start. I guess then we only disagree on Iraq. That means we are in a majority agreement!!! 66% ain't bad.forge wrote:but the POINT IS saddam was NO THREAT TO THE US WHATSOEVER - he was even a bit beyond being much of one to his own people by 2003robtronik wrote: 2) remove obvious threats like saddam
1. alot of the homeland stuff that actually did happen - and was probably all that was neededrobtronik wrote: Let me ask you guys: what would you have done after 9/11?
Gimme some understanding of what you would have done if you were President of the U.S.
rob.
2. go into afganistan where the actual training camps were
3. Not invade Iraq
Iraq appears to be the stickler. And, if you think about it, if we all chipped in to help them set up their government (as your PM has done - and we appreciate it) we would all be in a better place now.
But we've got Iran and Syria and former Batthists as well as Al Q. in there doing their damndest to not let Iraq turn into a democracy. Its a fight worth going through and now that Saddam is no longer there, he is one less leader (who has invaded other countries and used WMDs) we have to worry about w/ regard to terrorism.
BTW, check this out. From the documents found and confiscated from Iraq after he was removed from power:
This document is a letter from the Director of the Criminal Department, Na'man Ali Muhammad, to the Director of the Iraqi Intelligence Service, dated September 4, 1999:
interesting stuff now coming out about Saddam's activities. And we all wonder why he was in defiance of U.N. Security Council Resolutions for 14 years ... Yeah, give him the benefit of the doubt.Mr. Muhammad indicated that the International Inspection Committee would be inspecting the Al-Rashad location, among other locations, looking for non-conventional weapons and other chemical agents. He added that the following procedures were implemented on the fifth month of this year [TC: May 1999] in order to prevent disclosure of the locations:
1- Relocate all I[raqi] I[ntelligence] S[ervice] documents
2- Relocate all IIS chemical materials and equipment
3- Designate a group of employees from the Ministry of Health to replace the IIS employees
4- Relocate some of the officers and employees, whose job descriptions are not compatible with the Ministry of Health to Al-Rashidiah, and implement other appropriate concealment procedures.
He continues to state that present situation of the Directorate could be extended for an unspecified period of time. This situation could frequently reoccur, which has a direct negative impact on the performance and duties of the Directorate, with regards to providing essential levels of security. Consequently, the location of the site could be discovered. In addition the Ministry of Health may not be able to afford releasing its employees for a long period of time. Also, the presence of the Ministry of Health employees, and their integration with our employees, is a security breach. The close location of the directorate to other public locations, such as Al-Thaurah and Hay AlSinak, makes it a non-secure location. He added that the location is within the range of the enemy’s coordinates, and that special attention should be given to the collaborators who are present within these areas. The following alternate locations were suggested:
1- The Technical Research Center located on Palestine Street (previous Olympic Committee), since part of its Criminology Research Department was transferred to the Criminology Department.
2- Scientific Research Center, since it contains some laboratories that can be used for the work of the Criminology Department.
rob.