Live 6 Changes for DJ's

Discuss music production with Ableton Live.
JohnDP
Posts: 187
Joined: Wed Apr 20, 2005 6:17 am

Live 6 Changes for DJ's

Post by JohnDP » Sun Jul 16, 2006 10:09 am

So, Live 6 will come out and we know the features already but what is in it for us DJ's?

I do not see a feature that can really improve classical DJing. This is is not a criticism since every new release of Live is good for itself, but heck, what is so difficult to implement a NUDGE feature? Damn, its being asked for since 2-3 releases...

Johnisfaster
Posts: 7251
Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2005 8:34 am
Contact:

Post by Johnisfaster » Sun Jul 16, 2006 10:12 am

so don't buy it
It was as if someone shook up a 6 foot can of blood soda and suddenly popped the top.

Tarekith
Posts: 19140
Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2005 11:46 pm
Contact:

Post by Tarekith » Sun Jul 16, 2006 12:17 pm

Macros will be useful I think.

nuperspective
Posts: 1394
Joined: Sun Oct 31, 2004 3:45 pm
Location: was: accrington [england]. now: melbourne [australia]

Post by nuperspective » Sun Jul 16, 2006 12:33 pm

not wanting to burn anbody here, but live isnt a djing program. i dj with it but bought it for production. the djing aspect is a by product of the technology. that means you have to think about how you approach it in a different way. its a live performance tool. if you want classic style djing you should be looking at traktor or final scratch even.

for me the new features will push the way a work with it even further forward. i wouldnt dream of going back to decks, vinyl or even cds. i not trying to alienate anybody but live should never [and hopefully will never] be a dj orientated program. it allows far more freedom. yes lots of people use it for djing - me included. thats an added bonus as far as im concerned. if you buy live just to dj i think you have wasted your money to an extent as you have a massively powerful production tool widely going unused. you should really be looking for something else.

theres been a couple of threads about this issue and i cant really see whats got everyone so beefed.

gaspode
Posts: 1089
Joined: Sun Jan 19, 2003 6:56 am
Location: Hollis, NH
Contact:

Post by gaspode » Sun Jul 16, 2006 12:37 pm

I know this isn't the point... but DJs do seem to get along fine without a nudge feature... although I do agree that it would make working with classic DJs much easier as you wouldn't have to make them do all of the beat matching work.

thx1138
Posts: 676
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2005 9:03 am

Post by thx1138 » Sun Jul 16, 2006 2:12 pm

What are you on about lads Live does have a nudge feature, I use all the time Live and in Mix sets and it works great:-

See PDF manual - 8.1.5 Clip Offset and Nudging
Macbook Pro C2D2.5 17"/4G/OSX.5.6/Live8.12/Brain/Bla bla bla bla

djlt
Posts: 34
Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2005 10:53 am
Location: Ireland

Post by djlt » Sun Jul 16, 2006 2:53 pm

There are a few postings here on how to beatmatch with other DJ's on decks. I do this all the time and it did throw me off for a while too. The best way I find is to map the tempo of Live to a slider on your MIDI controller. Set the lower limit say to 124 and the higher limit to 132 (you will need to adjust this if you will ever have your BPM outside of this range). If you can close your limits to a smaller gap then all the better. What this does is when you move the slider the tempo increments in finer jumps .02 in my case with my levels. This allows you to beatmatch perfectly to other Dj's.

Hope this helps!
------------------------------------------------------
IBM T42 Laptop/XP Pro/Evolution UC33e/Live 5

JohnDP
Posts: 187
Joined: Wed Apr 20, 2005 6:17 am

Post by JohnDP » Sun Jul 16, 2006 3:08 pm

thx1138 wrote:What are you on about lads Live does have a nudge feature, I use all the time Live and in Mix sets and it works great:-

See PDF manual - 8.1.5 Clip Offset and Nudging
can you help me out a bit with that? I have my manual at home and am on vacation.

Thanks[/i]

hoffman2k
Posts: 14718
Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2004 6:40 pm
Location: Belgium
Contact:

Post by hoffman2k » Sun Jul 16, 2006 3:09 pm


JohnDP
Posts: 187
Joined: Wed Apr 20, 2005 6:17 am

Post by JohnDP » Sun Jul 16, 2006 6:41 pm

thanks, I tried but when I push the nudge function the track just jumps back a second or so instead of slowing down like a turntable.

Am I doing something wrong?

Johnisfaster
Posts: 7251
Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2005 8:34 am
Contact:

Post by Johnisfaster » Sun Jul 16, 2006 6:45 pm

so use a turn table
It was as if someone shook up a 6 foot can of blood soda and suddenly popped the top.

RePeter
Posts: 421
Joined: Sun Nov 28, 2004 12:42 pm

Post by RePeter » Sun Jul 16, 2006 8:33 pm

I really dont see the use of a nudge function (other than quantized and used creatively.)

It took me six months to re-learn how to mix without it, but now i can play over top of another DJ for hours just using fine adjustment of the tempo slider.

nuperspective is right... this is not a dj program.

by adapting to the technology we are given, and being inventive with that, rather than demanding an exact digital copy of the turntable experience, we can, and are already, redefining how djs work.
MBP 2.4 & a shit load of Faderfoxes!

Machinate
Posts: 11648
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2004 2:15 pm
Location: Denmark

Post by Machinate » Sun Jul 16, 2006 8:52 pm

JohnDP wrote:thanks, I tried but when I push the nudge function the track just jumps back a second or so instead of slowing down like a turntable.

Am I doing something wrong?
yes, you're not setting the global quantize to None - if you do that you will be moving backwards and forwards by very small increments.
RePeter wrote:I really dont see the use of a nudge function (other than quantized and used creatively.)
I would tend to agree - the mere fact that it nudges in Global Q increments does seem to point towards the creative use...
mbp 2.66, osx 10.6.8, 8GB ram.

KU
Posts: 309
Joined: Sat Apr 09, 2005 7:23 pm
Location: Santa Cruz, CA
Contact:

Post by KU » Sun Jul 16, 2006 8:55 pm

the guy has a valid complaint. The new release has some great features but when I see something like Video Implementation before extremely important functional performance features - well that is lame.

To me, Live is a sequencing performance instrument. I don't want the focus of the updates to be about DAW features, it should be about how it is used as an instrument. The board has been vocal about such features like Sound-On-Sound looping, global nudge, turntable emulation. It's not about turning Live into a simple DJ program, but these features expand the performance options. I don't even DJ with live, but I would like the global tempo section to be able to mimic a technics 1200 because that would be superior!

noisetonepause
Posts: 4938
Joined: Sat Dec 28, 2002 3:38 pm
Location: Sticks and stones

Post by noisetonepause » Sun Jul 16, 2006 9:57 pm

KU wrote:but I would like the global tempo section to be able to mimic a technics 1200 because that would be superior!
Set all your clips to repitch and map the tempo to a slider on your controller!
Suit #1: I mean, have you got any insight as to why a bright boy like this would jeopardize the lives of millions?
Suit #2: No, sir, he says he does this sort of thing for fun.

Post Reply