Recording Vinyl - Ableton Vs Sound Forge

Share your favorite Ableton Live tips, tricks, and techniques.
Post Reply
Nic Synaes
Posts: 11
Joined: Mon Jun 26, 2006 8:18 pm
Location: London UK
Contact:

Recording Vinyl - Ableton Vs Sound Forge

Post by Nic Synaes » Sat Jul 08, 2006 9:38 am

I think the topic should say it all - what is the better program to use? I normally use Sound Forge through habit more than anything, but now I am using Ableton more and more, I figured I'd see what everyone's opinion is of just using that to record with...

stealth1
Posts: 485
Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2005 12:16 pm
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:

Post by stealth1 » Sat Jul 08, 2006 11:45 am

I just use Live, works fine for me!

Michael-SW
Posts: 2054
Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 4:05 pm
Location: Stockholm, Sweden

Post by Michael-SW » Sat Jul 08, 2006 11:18 pm

Doesn't really matter - use what you are most comfortable with. Recording a single audio source only dumps the bits coming from your audio interface to a file on your hard drive. You could use Window´s built in audio recorder and get the exact same result.

However, try to record in 24 bits if you have the disk space to spare.

Jiddahmoon
Posts: 6
Joined: Mon Jul 24, 2006 7:21 pm

Post by Jiddahmoon » Mon Jul 24, 2006 7:57 pm

Use whichever audio interface of yours has the best A/D conversion. The audio engine in your DAW matters, but much less so than the converters in your interface.

supster
Posts: 2133
Joined: Mon Sep 20, 2004 6:26 am
Location: Orlando FL

Post by supster » Mon Jul 24, 2006 8:02 pm

for ripping vinyl I go straight into Live, but record into a mini VST called Tapeit2.

works great. i dont believe people that say they can tell the difference recoding into soundforge,

i dont think there's any difference in sound quality, and the recording process is much faster and convienient into Live.

.
--
NEW SPECS: Athlon 4200+ dual; A8N-SLI m/b; Win XP Home SP2; 1 GB RAM; 2x 7200 RPM HDD: 1 internal, 1 Firewire 800 (Firewire is project data drive); M-Audio Triggerfinger

josh 'vonster' von; tracks and sets
http://www.joshvon.com

djastroboy
Posts: 616
Joined: Fri Feb 25, 2005 1:24 pm
Location: St. Louis
Contact:

Post by djastroboy » Mon Jul 24, 2006 8:39 pm

I vote Soundforge for more precise metering of the incoming level and easier editing, normalizing, and even using the noise removal tool for clicks & pops.

KU
Posts: 309
Joined: Sat Apr 09, 2005 7:23 pm
Location: Santa Cruz, CA
Contact:

Post by KU » Mon Jul 24, 2006 9:28 pm

I've done both - and Soundforge is my choice

better metering and you can actually trim the results.

supster
Posts: 2133
Joined: Mon Sep 20, 2004 6:26 am
Location: Orlando FL

Post by supster » Mon Jul 24, 2006 9:53 pm

djastroboy wrote:I vote Soundforge for more precise metering of the incoming level and easier editing, normalizing, and even using the noise removal tool for clicks & pops.

im getting better metering results with the Inspector XL using Katz K-14 system right in Live.

true -- trimming the beginnings and ends I still have to do in Soundforge, but thats all. Live 6 features trimming built right in, so then i wont use SF at all :)

.
--
NEW SPECS: Athlon 4200+ dual; A8N-SLI m/b; Win XP Home SP2; 1 GB RAM; 2x 7200 RPM HDD: 1 internal, 1 Firewire 800 (Firewire is project data drive); M-Audio Triggerfinger

josh 'vonster' von; tracks and sets
http://www.joshvon.com

Post Reply