<waaaay OT> what the f*ck do you think of this??????
-
brightonalex
- Posts: 1381
- Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2005 12:30 pm
-
frankie123
- Posts: 372
- Joined: Sat Sep 02, 2006 8:45 pm
-
brightonalex
- Posts: 1381
- Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2005 12:30 pm
This dude has a clear idea of where he is heading. ETERNAL COOL.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gq--g4zIuNA
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gq--g4zIuNA
err_eur wrote:gee, I'm sure that's going to be accurate and truthful, judging by the .gov at the end. I am becoming more and more aware of this and it is terrifying. 10 years is not a long time. BTW that link tell me nothing. Yes we have been involved in wars for oil, BUT the "supply vs demand" ratio is shrinking rapidly, compounded by exponential increase in world population.frankie123 wrote:Link talking about the US oil reserve.
http://www.fossil.energy.gov/programs/reserves/
It's ok, denial is a natural mechanism of the brain towards these type of subjects, which are so magnanimous that the brain really can't fathom the implications. Best just to ignore the problem....yet the problem will not go away because of our refusal to acknowledge it.
just do a search on GOOGLE VIDEO for "OIL SMOKE AND MIRRORS". Watch this incredible video and then tell me what you think. This video is the clearest and most informative that I have found on the imminent crisis.
Then go and watch Al GORE's "AN INCONVENIENT TRUTH".
maybe then you will have a clear understanding of where you will be heading in the next 2 decades.
I have nothing else to say here, so don't bother with anymore of you guys' cheap shots at me, I WON'T respond.
And I agree, this Forum is not the place to discuss this......so I won't anymore.
-
frankie123
- Posts: 372
- Joined: Sat Sep 02, 2006 8:45 pm
"It's ok, denial is a natural mechanism of the brain towards these type of subjects, which are so magnanimous that the brain really can't fathom the implications. Best just to ignore the problem....yet the problem will not go away because of our refusal to acknowledge it."
Maybe you should pay attention to your own rules, pompous moron. Go eat a tofu sandwich and think real hard about the stupid you've splattered all over this thread.
Maybe you should pay attention to your own rules, pompous moron. Go eat a tofu sandwich and think real hard about the stupid you've splattered all over this thread.
dual g5 2.3 ghz 2500 megs of ram
Current oil on reserve - 688,300,000 barrelsfrankie123 wrote:Link talking about the US oil reserve.
http://www.fossil.energy.gov/programs/reserves/
http://www2.spr.doe.gov/DIR/SilverStrea ... E_new.html
Current monthly consumption - 638,038,000 barrels
http://tonto.eia.doe.gov/dnav/pet/pet_c ... mbbl_m.htm
Notice anything about this?
Not only that, but the reserve is REALLY intended for military use shuold there be a crisis in the flow lines. The reserve is certainly not a buffer should demand outpace supply or supply become seriously impaired.
-
djadonis206
- Posts: 6490
- Joined: Thu Jun 17, 2004 4:23 pm
- Location: Seattle, WA.
pilcrow wrote:err_eur wrote:gee, I'm sure that's going to be accurate and truthful, judging by the .gov at the end. I am becoming more and more aware of this and it is terrifying. 10 years is not a long time. BTW that link tell me nothing. Yes we have been involved in wars for oil, BUT the "supply vs demand" ratio is shrinking rapidly, compounded by exponential increase in world population.frankie123 wrote:Link talking about the US oil reserve.
http://www.fossil.energy.gov/programs/reserves/
It's ok, denial is a natural mechanism of the brain towards these type of subjects, which are so magnanimous that the brain really can't fathom the implications. Best just to ignore the problem....yet the problem will not go away because of our refusal to acknowledge it.
just do a search on GOOGLE VIDEO for "OIL SMOKE AND MIRRORS". Watch this incredible video and then tell me what you think. This video is the clearest and most informative that I have found on the imminent crisis.
Then go and watch Al GORE's "AN INCONVENIENT TRUTH".
maybe then you will have a clear understanding of where you will be heading in the next 2 decades.
I have nothing else to say here, so don't bother with anymore of you guys' cheap shots at me, I WON'T respond.
And I agree, this Forum is not the place to discuss this......so I won't anymore.Don't go away mad.
Go with Christ brah!
Last edited by djadonis206 on Thu Oct 19, 2006 4:25 pm, edited 1 time in total.
What is the current population growth rate?err_eur wrote:
don't forget the fact that the population is increasing at enormous,exponential rates, and we are not discovering any new oil pockets that are substantial enough to allow us to continue with our current rate of consumption for more than a few decades at best.
what does it mean??? Hmm. I wonder.....nah, better not think about it.
oh and I'm agnostic BTW......
-
frankie123
- Posts: 372
- Joined: Sat Sep 02, 2006 8:45 pm
err_eur wrote:pulsoc wrote:Current oil on reserve - 688,300,000 barrelsfrankie123 wrote:Link talking about the US oil reserve.
http://www.fossil.energy.gov/programs/reserves/
http://www2.spr.doe.gov/DIR/SilverStrea ... E_new.html
Current monthly consumption - 638,038,000 barrels
http://tonto.eia.doe.gov/dnav/pet/pet_c ... mbbl_m.htm
Notice anything about this?
Not only that, but the reserve is REALLY intended for military use shuold there be a crisis in the flow lines. The reserve is certainly not a buffer should demand outpace supply or supply become seriously impaired.
thank you! god forbid we have to go to war on any other "fronts"....like, say Iran or N. Korea!!!!!
don't forget the fact that the population is increasing at enormous,exponential rates, and we are not discovering any new oil pockets that are substantial enough to allow us to continue with our current rate of consumption for more than a few decades at best.
what does it mean??? Hmm. I wonder.....nah, better not think about it.
oh and I'm agnostic BTW......
Have you ever heard of fuel cell technology?
http://www.fuelcells.org/
dual g5 2.3 ghz 2500 megs of ram
-
frankie123
- Posts: 372
- Joined: Sat Sep 02, 2006 8:45 pm


