Can LIVE replace my other recording software???
Can LIVE replace my other recording software???
I'm currently using Digital Performer 3 and I'm wondering if LIVE could replace it for studio usage aswell as live use. The kind of music I make involves very little looping and mostly one time sound clips and a small amount of MIDI recording. The only FX I would use would probably be reverb and time-stretching (which LIVE would be great for).
If I've been too vague as to my needs for using it, please go on the basis of other people who use it to replace Cubase, Logic, DP3, Protools, etc.
If I've been too vague as to my needs for using it, please go on the basis of other people who use it to replace Cubase, Logic, DP3, Protools, etc.
Live will change the way you work. Try using it on a project and see what you think. You might like it better, you might now. It's certainly possible to record tradition album projects in Live:
http://raza.suso.org/mp3/olenka/
/Scott
http://raza.suso.org/mp3/olenka/
/Scott
Things about Live I like better than Digital Performer:
1) Smoother layout. If you're used to working with Piano roll midi clips, they are much easier to work with in Live.
2) No slow screen redraws.
3) No need to manage multiple floating windows.
4) Live does not require a seperate midi track and an insutrment track for virtual synths.
5) Native support for both VST and AU. DP still works best with MAS plugins and is finicky with some AU plugins. No VST support natively.
You don't have to switch to OS X if you want to use Live 4. You can stay OS 9. Live projects are interchangable between Mac and PC.
1) Smoother layout. If you're used to working with Piano roll midi clips, they are much easier to work with in Live.
2) No slow screen redraws.
3) No need to manage multiple floating windows.
4) Live does not require a seperate midi track and an insutrment track for virtual synths.
5) Native support for both VST and AU. DP still works best with MAS plugins and is finicky with some AU plugins. No VST support natively.
You don't have to switch to OS X if you want to use Live 4. You can stay OS 9. Live projects are interchangable between Mac and PC.
Accidents are the portal to discovery!
-
Beat_Master
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2004 12:07 am
- Location: Bright lights. Big city.
Re: Can LIVE replace my other recording software???
All i can say is that i've been a big Logic user for years - and although i had a brief 'affair' with Reason - i am completely blown away by Live 4. After using the Live 4 demo for a few hours i decided i had to have it.aelo wrote:I'm currently using Digital Performer 3 and I'm wondering if LIVE could replace it for studio usage aswell as live use. The kind of music I make involves very little looping and mostly one time sound clips and a small amount of MIDI recording. The only FX I would use would probably be reverb and time-stretching (which LIVE would be great for).
If I've been too vague as to my needs for using it, please go on the basis of other people who use it to replace Cubase, Logic, DP3, Protools, etc.
Its not just another sequencer - its a damn revelation !!
Download the 4.0.2 demo and do the tutorial 'lessons' included in the browser.
This is all it takes to really see the brilliance of this programme.
Live may not be the ideal tool to do Pro mixing, multi-tracking or mastering audio (i have Logic for those tasks) but for using loops with midi, writing, composing, inspiration and - best of all - playing "Live" (which is new to me) - nothing touches Live 4.
I just have a feeling it will make DP3 look very dated !!
Go and buy a copy immediately !! !!
You can thank me later.
PS: I dont work for the Abletons !!
Dual 1.25 MDD. Panther+OS9. 1Gig DDR. Dual Seagates. Verax fans. Audiophile 24/96. Live 4. Logic Pro 6. Reason 2.5. Absynth 2. UC33e. PC180.
Beat_Master's post is spot on. I've had an identical experience (coming from years with Cubase). In summary:
1. Live is unique and revolutionary. You need to spend time with it to "get it". Do that and you will be hooked. And that's a good thing!
2. Get the demo, do the tutorials, and play around with it. Give it at least 3-4 hours before making a decision.
3. Logic/Cubase/etc. are better for some things, particularly mixing and mastering.
4. You can't sync to video with Live.
5. For writing, jamming, and inspiration, Live is so far ahead of every other sequencer that it lives in a different universe.
6. Using Live, you will get twice as much work done in half the time.
For what you're doing, you shouldn't need anything more than Live. Just try it out and see!
1. Live is unique and revolutionary. You need to spend time with it to "get it". Do that and you will be hooked. And that's a good thing!
2. Get the demo, do the tutorials, and play around with it. Give it at least 3-4 hours before making a decision.
3. Logic/Cubase/etc. are better for some things, particularly mixing and mastering.
4. You can't sync to video with Live.
5. For writing, jamming, and inspiration, Live is so far ahead of every other sequencer that it lives in a different universe.
6. Using Live, you will get twice as much work done in half the time.
For what you're doing, you shouldn't need anything more than Live. Just try it out and see!
-
futureproof
- Posts: 339
- Joined: Thu Jul 01, 2004 6:21 am
- Location: tOKYO
Can LIVE replace my other recording software???
The only correct answer to this question is when its asked by you rhetorically.
In other words, try it and find out for yourself.
http://www.ableton.com/index.php?main=downloads
The only correct answer to this question is when its asked by you rhetorically.
In other words, try it and find out for yourself.
http://www.ableton.com/index.php?main=downloads
"THE biggest differences between Live 3 & 4 are the things that Live 4 have that are missing in Live 3"
-some dude on KVR.
-some dude on KVR.
-
Mididreamer
- Posts: 211
- Joined: Sun Jul 11, 2004 6:23 am
- Location: The Netherlands, Almere
- Contact:
Re: Can LIVE replace my other recording software???
Why use a telephone when you can email? Different tools for different purposes. Why not use alle software together after a while you can decide to use the phone or to do your communication with email!aelo wrote:I'm currently using Digital Performer 3 and I'm wondering if LIVE could replace it for studio usage aswell as live use. The kind of music I make involves very little looping and mostly one time sound clips and a small amount of MIDI recording. The only FX I would use would probably be reverb and time-stretching (which LIVE would be great for).
If I've been too vague as to my needs for using it, please go on the basis of other people who use it to replace Cubase, Logic, DP3, Protools, etc.
Live Sonar Cubase Project 5v2 Record/Reason FL Zero SL Oxygen8V2 NT1-A Rode Sennheiser HD590 FW-1884 System Q9550 8 GB 1066 Windows 7
Musictitbits http://www.mididreamer.com/documents/discography.html
Musictitbits http://www.mididreamer.com/documents/discography.html