quality of bounced/rendered tracks

logos · Post by **logos** » Sat Nov 02, 2002 9:42 am

in live , rendered to disk tracks (maybe 4 simultanous tracks) seem to be much more weak in quality than the original loops.

is this a bug or are there workarounds?

Stiffy · Post by **Stiffy** » Mon Nov 04, 2002 6:17 pm

But I find it best to post-process rendered tracks, even if only to add a little EQ. I actually find that I get better sound from a rendered track than I do from the original loops... Strange...

FORMAT · Post by **FORMAT** » Mon Nov 04, 2002 8:18 pm

I find the render quality in live exceptionally good. No complaints there.

format

Stiffy · Post by **Stiffy** » Mon Nov 04, 2002 9:35 pm

You might try increasing the gain on the individual loops- this can punch up muddy loops quite a bit....

logos · Post by **logos** » Tue Nov 05, 2002 8:22 pm

stiffy, what u say, you find the quality of rendered tracks better than the source material --- wow strange.

metrognome32 · Post by **metrognome32** » Tue Nov 05, 2002 10:04 pm

I notice that when I render tracks that they don't sound quite as good as when I play them pre-rendered in live. Anyone else experience this?

-gNome

burgessa23 · Post by **burgessa23** » Wed Nov 06, 2002 2:04 am

gNome - are you the same guy as metrognome from azSessions?

quality of bounced/rendered tracks

quality of bounced/rendered tracks

Have not really noticed...

Suggestion