looking 4 MINIMAL, DUB, HOUSE, MICROHOUSE, MICROTECHNO users

minimal · Post by **minimal** » Mon Oct 18, 2004 10:21 am

another microhouse, click&cuts, minimal techno and last but not least a huge dub fan here.
Nice the idea to create a kind of network!
Going to live in zürich in a few weeks (I'm in lugano at the moment).
If someone near ZH is reading why not to get in touch?

all the best
& stay groovy

Montonn · Post by **Montonn** » Tue Nov 02, 2004 3:50 am

What happened to the idea of the net label? Was it ever followed through with? I've been searching for more info on this genre. Lets keep it flowing. Updating each other is always a good fun thing.

Montonn · Post by **Montonn** » Tue Nov 02, 2004 3:53 am

Also, as a reference. What are the average track counts for your minimal tracks. How minimal are you guys getting?
Montonn

epilacs · Post by **epilacs** » Tue Nov 02, 2004 7:49 am

one track of 9,00o mhz impulses
25 bpm

ping

ping

ping

ping

ping

ping

ping

ping

ping

ping

AdamJay · Post by **AdamJay** » Tue Nov 02, 2004 8:01 am

epilacs wrote:one track of 9,00o mhz impulses
25 bpm

9,000 mhz? as in 9 Ghz ?
i didn't realize that unit of measure applied to audio.
i'll be damned.

Machinate · Post by **Machinate** » Tue Nov 02, 2004 9:56 am

AdamJay wrote:
epilacs wrote:one track of 9,00o mhz impulses
25 bpm

9,000 mhz? as in 9 Ghz ?
i didn't realize that unit of measure applied to audio.
i'll be damned.

well, it does, it's just waay beyond human hearing capacity. We can only hear up until the 20.000 hertz mark or so.
Instead of seeing "sound" as "what we hear", see it as "rapid fluctuation of air-pressure".
Now, finding a DAW that can RECORD that track is another matter!

epilacs · Post by **epilacs** » Wed Nov 03, 2004 6:18 am

minimal grind
micro doom
moustache electro
etc
etc

supster · Post by **supster** » Wed Nov 03, 2004 7:00 am

BC wrote:
subbasshead wrote:

If you want a REALLY deep dub(bish) tech mix check:

http://www.paxahau.com/sounds/2004/jmar ... anacea.ram

Wow is this set awesome. Thanks for the link ...

Kage · Post by **Kage** » Wed Nov 03, 2004 7:53 am

Yes, thinner is the best netlabel for this style, in my bias opinion

Hehehe..

gauss control · Post by **gauss control** » Wed Nov 03, 2004 10:22 am

Montonn wrote:What happened to the idea of the net label? Was it ever followed through with? I've been searching for more info on this genre. Lets keep it flowing. Updating each other is always a good fun thing.

We are still on it.. www.livestuff.net

I'm not very good explaining the concept in english

i hope you understand it on the forum. There is a thread about it, but in a few words.. this is not a net label or a place to share track-sets with many people. I think a good numer of producers into the project might be 10 (or less).

If you don´t play liveSets please don't sign in... I thought this project to share tracks "exclusively to play live", not for colaborations.

That's becuse i seek a group of producers into the same styles (from minimal to tech-house)

looking 4 MINIMAL, DUB, HOUSE, MICROHOUSE, MICROTECHNO users

Re: King Tubbys cool but....