:: RENDER AUDIO :: NOT THE QUALITY AS YOU HEAR IT ::
:: RENDER AUDIO :: NOT THE QUALITY AS YOU HEAR IT ::
i experience (also with HIQ on):
rendered audiofiles are not
sounding the way i hear the signal before
rendering...
workaround is: resampling into live
this works fine.
anyone else the same experiences?
btw: why does rendering not work as it should?
best
u
rendered audiofiles are not
sounding the way i hear the signal before
rendering...
workaround is: resampling into live
this works fine.
anyone else the same experiences?
btw: why does rendering not work as it should?
best
u
computer: laptop powerbook g4, 667Mhz, 768 MB
os: osx 10.3.5
Live version: Live 4.1
Native Instruments Komplete 2
soundcard: motu 828mk2
midi-interface: uc 33 / motu 828mk2
mikrokorg
e-guitar & various analog guitar fx boxes
os: osx 10.3.5
Live version: Live 4.1
Native Instruments Komplete 2
soundcard: motu 828mk2
midi-interface: uc 33 / motu 828mk2
mikrokorg
e-guitar & various analog guitar fx boxes
-
Lo-Fi Massahkah
- Posts: 3604
- Joined: Fri Jun 04, 2004 2:57 pm
- Location: The south east suburbs of Malmö, Sweden.
I've had no probs rendering, make sure that everything is unchecked in the render options list, especially nomalise, and have a good limiter across the outputs. Just set it to it's most gentle settings if you don't need to compress much, you just need to ensure that nothing clips your outputs.
Should be ok.
Should be ok.
Just use Silverspike Tape-it. http://www.silverspike.com/download.html
do a forum search.
there have been many threads relating to this.
it will be easy to pick up on the workarounds and such.
there have been many threads relating to this.
it will be easy to pick up on the workarounds and such.
_____________________________
http://users.adelphia.net/~epilacs
http://users.adelphia.net/~epilacs
..
sample rates differences probaly. most synth sound better in 96 kHZ
Re: ..
very good point.raapie wrote:sample rates differences probaly. most synth sound better in 96 kHZ
milfbait wrote:Just use Silverspike Tape-it. http://www.silverspike.com/download.html
Does Tapit2 record cut loops (1, 2, 4, 8 bar)? It says it does "Synchronized recordings. Four different synchronization sources"
Is that what that means. Do you own this?
try backing off on the master volume before you render.
i have had tracks that sounded fine but then came out
too hot after rendering (with no normalization)
also, what exactly is the difference in sound?
i have had tracks that sounded fine but then came out
too hot after rendering (with no normalization)
also, what exactly is the difference in sound?
_____________________________
http://users.adelphia.net/~epilacs
http://users.adelphia.net/~epilacs
-
Vercengetorex
- Posts: 826
- Joined: Thu Nov 07, 2002 12:38 pm
- Location: Brooklyn, NYC
You mentioned reasmpling "into Live", does this mean you are running from an analog output back into an analog input on your audio interface?
I find that I far more often use Lives very flexible routing to reasmple in Live, as I dislike the render option myself (not for sound quality, just for ease of use in my workflow) and find no audible difference between an original file, and one re-recorded with Live 4s incredible new routing. Give it a try!
I find that I far more often use Lives very flexible routing to reasmple in Live, as I dislike the render option myself (not for sound quality, just for ease of use in my workflow) and find no audible difference between an original file, and one re-recorded with Live 4s incredible new routing. Give it a try!
I cant think of a sig
Yes, you can specify any number of bars or beats to record (this is one of the 4 syncing modes).supster wrote:
Does Tapit2 record cut loops (1, 2, 4, 8 bar)? It says it does "Synchronized recordings. Four different synchronization sources"
Is that what that means.
And it can normalize your records on the fly.