LIVE 4 PERFORMANCE TEST
-
theofficials
- Posts: 103
- Joined: Sun Aug 15, 2004 6:37 pm
- Location: U.K
1) 32% (peak value, average 28%)
2) Desktop, Own Build DAW
3) XP Pro +l SP2
4) Pentium 4, 2.8 GHz
5) 512 MB RAM (Corsair DDR SDRAM [PC3200])
6) SBLive using KX drivers - KX ASIO
7) 7200 rpm (200GB S-ATA) Western Digital with 8mb cache.
Sample Rate set @ 512 samples
Input + Output = 11ms thus overall latency = 22ms..
Was impossible for me to get any closer to 0ms latency - when I lowered the sample rate dropped aswell from 512 to 256..
*off to compare now*
2) Desktop, Own Build DAW
3) XP Pro +l SP2
4) Pentium 4, 2.8 GHz
5) 512 MB RAM (Corsair DDR SDRAM [PC3200])
6) SBLive using KX drivers - KX ASIO
7) 7200 rpm (200GB S-ATA) Western Digital with 8mb cache.
Sample Rate set @ 512 samples
Input + Output = 11ms thus overall latency = 22ms..
Was impossible for me to get any closer to 0ms latency - when I lowered the sample rate dropped aswell from 512 to 256..
*off to compare now*
I have just tested my new laptop, which is running XP sp2, and I have made some os tweaks from musicXP.net,
My results with live 4.04 demo, and a latency of 528 samples(wasnt able to get exactly 512) with asio driver(asio2ks):
1) 22%
2) Compal cl56
3) Windows XP Pro sp2
4) Pentium M 735 1.7ghz
5) 512 MB Ram, pc3200
6) Realtek onboard sound with Asio driver(Asio2ks)
7) 7200RPM HD
My results with live 4.04 demo, and a latency of 528 samples(wasnt able to get exactly 512) with asio driver(asio2ks):
1) 22%
2) Compal cl56
3) Windows XP Pro sp2
4) Pentium M 735 1.7ghz
5) 512 MB Ram, pc3200
6) Realtek onboard sound with Asio driver(Asio2ks)
7) 7200RPM HD
-Compal cl56-dothan 1.7-512mb pc3200-60gb 7200-
you can change the value with the arrow keys to press up or down the desired settingblafferen wrote:I have just tested my new laptop, which is running XP sp2, and I have made some os tweaks from musicXP.net,
My results with live 4.04 demo, and a latency of 528 samples(wasnt able to get exactly 512) with asio driver(asio2ks):
1) Min = 33% / Max = 37% (spikes briefly) Avg = 35%
2) PC Desktop, E-Machines, VIA Chipset
3) XP SP2
4) Athlon 2600
5) 1 GB
6) M-Audio Audiophile 24/96 PCI - Edirol UA-25 USB (for input + headphones - Asio4all driver (disabled onboard sound)
7) 7200 RPM Internal
Looks like I'm a tad high for what my system should be ... about 5% ... wondering why ..
2) PC Desktop, E-Machines, VIA Chipset
3) XP SP2
4) Athlon 2600
5) 1 GB
6) M-Audio Audiophile 24/96 PCI - Edirol UA-25 USB (for input + headphones - Asio4all driver (disabled onboard sound)
7) 7200 RPM Internal
Looks like I'm a tad high for what my system should be ... about 5% ... wondering why ..
--
NEW SPECS: Athlon 4200+ dual; A8N-SLI m/b; Win XP Home SP2; 1 GB RAM; 2x 7200 RPM HDD: 1 internal, 1 Firewire 800 (Firewire is project data drive); M-Audio Triggerfinger
josh 'vonster' von; tracks and sets
http://www.joshvon.com
NEW SPECS: Athlon 4200+ dual; A8N-SLI m/b; Win XP Home SP2; 1 GB RAM; 2x 7200 RPM HDD: 1 internal, 1 Firewire 800 (Firewire is project data drive); M-Audio Triggerfinger
josh 'vonster' von; tracks and sets
http://www.joshvon.com
-
Aural Chaos
- Posts: 35
- Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 5:34 pm
1) 47% peak
2) Mac G4
3) 10.3.6
4) Motorola PowerPC G4 7455B 1.47GHz
5) 1.5 GB SDRAM PC133
6) stock
7) 7200rpm
I replaced Live's reverb with Apple's with similar settings and the CPU peaked at 37% with no difference in sound quality to my untrained ears. That's kinda good news I guess. However, I wouldn't mind if Ableton optimized Live for the Mac just a wee bit more
2) Mac G4
3) 10.3.6
4) Motorola PowerPC G4 7455B 1.47GHz
5) 1.5 GB SDRAM PC133
6) stock
7) 7200rpm
I replaced Live's reverb with Apple's with similar settings and the CPU peaked at 37% with no difference in sound quality to my untrained ears. That's kinda good news I guess. However, I wouldn't mind if Ableton optimized Live for the Mac just a wee bit more
-
reincarnationfish
- Posts: 29
- Joined: Mon May 05, 2003 10:16 am
1) 106% System totally ground to a halt. It was hell to get it to stop playing, let me tell you.
2) Dell Dimension 2400
3) WinXP SP2
4) Celeron 2400
5) 512
6) Tascam US 122
7) 5400
Well, my system practically fell over when trying to play this file. I didn't expect much, but I didn't expect it would be that bad. Having said that, the PC I'm using was cheap as chips and it does comfortably outperform the machine I replaced with it, so I shouldn't complain.
2) Dell Dimension 2400
3) WinXP SP2
4) Celeron 2400
5) 512
6) Tascam US 122
7) 5400
Well, my system practically fell over when trying to play this file. I didn't expect much, but I didn't expect it would be that bad. Having said that, the PC I'm using was cheap as chips and it does comfortably outperform the machine I replaced with it, so I shouldn't complain.
pop music is not a toy