Barack Obama Honeymoon period: How long before you start?

Discuss music production with Ableton Live.

How long will the honeymoon last?

 
Total votes: 0

knotkranky
Posts: 4336
Joined: Tue Mar 14, 2006 7:08 pm
Location: la

Re: Barack Obama Honeymoon period: How long before you start?

Post by knotkranky » Sun Mar 29, 2009 9:17 pm

Machinesworking wrote:
knotkranky wrote:
Machinesworking wrote: No colonialist made, dictatorship run, US trade sanctioned, and then occupied country like Iraq will be stable with our presence, and whether we pull out now or 50 years from now, the possibility of violence is still there. Yugoslavia is a great example in recent history. Eerily similar, three major ethnic groups, hostilities among them as a result of WW1 and 2, a dictator that held the country together, and chaos after he was gone. In this case though, Saddam isn't the dictator that 'holds the country together', it's the US occupational presence, and it's also a big reason for the chaos there.

Remember, we're talking about 18-25 year olds from all over the US, these aren't well trained diplomats, but kids, with guns, going though peoples houses, and shooting the wrong person on more than one occasion. I'm sorry man, but you're just being thick skinned about this. Nothing we do there is stabilizing the country, our presence is a destabilizing force, there's no doubt about it. When we leave, they will make deals with countries we don't 'approve' of, like Iran, and again, that will happen if we leave today or 50 years from now.

What is the amount of civilian deaths by our hands that tips you towards realizing that we simply cannot wear the badge of stabilizing force in a country we attacked without provocation?

You are most certainly not a tree hugging peace-nic. Sorry to break it to you, but you're about as moderate/reactionary as they come.
For fuck sake MW i'm against the fucking war! Geezus, lol. as usual you assume well too much about me and poorly at that. Ok, you believe there is no responsible way of getting out, so just do it already. Ok, I'm ready to be educated. What will transpire if we do?


You're not against the war if you think us staying there is a good idea. The current 'democratically elected' government of Iraq wants us out, the people there want us gone, the whole of the middle east wants us out. People will die today or tomorrow there in some conflict brought out by all this, it's not any righteous move on our part to stay, we are not stabilizing the country by keeping armed forces there that don't even know the local language, who have raped and killed, who represent a government that started the war with little or no reason to begin with.

Parroting back what Obama or any of the elected officials say about this is just silly. We as the aggressor in this situation talking about how 20+ million people are not capable of running their own system, because what? because they don't have our values? If you or anybody else thinks we or any country can force "freedom" on people..... you cannot force people to be anti prejudiced, it's never happened and lasted.

They don't want us there, we have vested interest there, that's the only reality now, the BS about saving the Iraqis from themselves is so hypocritical and wrong headed it's not even funny. There's this arrogance that the west has about what they call freedom, and how great it is etc. How others want this, how our way of life should be embraced etc. Along with this, I think a lot of third world, and middle eastern countries have seen a consistent interest in our own corporate welfare. This is so predictable, Haliberton's no bid contracts aren't just reported here, the whole of the middle east sees that stuff, and notices that GWB and crew are all oil. These things, along with Obamas continued back peddling on his Iraq exit strategy, these things make us look like shit there. With that in mind, ask yourself if the average Iraqi, who's lost people in the war, who's life is interrupted by all this, if he thinks the USA forces are preventing Iraq from falling to chaos, or if the forces are perpetuating it? I would be willing to bet his answer (if asked in an anonymous fashion with no fear of being branded a terrorist), would be that we need to go, ASAP, period.

The short of it is this, they see us as self serving colonialists, there will be trouble there whether we go or stay, and there's nothing we can do to prevent that.
Don't kid yourself, history has proven over and over again that the aggressor can't stabilize a country with military force forever.


What?? no no no, I don't think staying there is a great idea.

Dude, I want the fuck out of iraq as quickly and as responsibly possible.

Right, we are not stabilizing shit, but we could destabilize it a hell of a lot more by how we leave.

I don't disagree with a single word you've said except for what you think i've said.

There is the right way and the wrong way to bring all the troops home.
Sorry, I don't have anymore for anyone who doesn't have sensitivity to that. I think you broke yer listening bone.

:?

b0unce
Posts: 5379
Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 4:16 pm

Re: Barack Obama Honeymoon period: How long before you start?

Post by b0unce » Sun Mar 29, 2009 10:17 pm

Transition force ?

:lol: / :cry:
spreader of butter

dcease
Posts: 2407
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2007 4:43 am

Re: Barack Obama Honeymoon period: How long before you start?

Post by dcease » Sun Mar 29, 2009 10:34 pm

b0unce wrote:Transition force ?
sounds like a metal band :lol:
this friday night at the frank irwin center... TRANSITION FORCE with special guests dangerous toys and krokus!

they prolly suck...

Homebelly
Posts: 2891
Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2007 9:52 pm
Location: Aotearoa New Zealand
Contact:

Re: Barack Obama Honeymoon period: How long before you start?

Post by Homebelly » Sun Mar 29, 2009 11:02 pm

b0unce wrote:Transition force ?

:lol: / :cry:
they could be given boots made of genuine imitation leather.
15" 2.4 MBP/Live/Sampler/Operator/ Home made Dumble clone/Two Strats/One Jazz Bass.
Come and visit any time= Soundcloud

Machinesworking
Posts: 11551
Joined: Wed Jun 23, 2004 9:30 pm
Location: Seattle

Re: Barack Obama Honeymoon period: How long before you start?

Post by Machinesworking » Tue Mar 31, 2009 10:05 pm

knotkranky wrote: What?? no no no, I don't think staying there is a great idea.

Dude, I want the fuck out of iraq as quickly and as responsibly possible.
Then quit supporting Obama's decision to stay for another 2 years and leave a force of 50,000 indefinitely.
Right, we are not stabilizing shit, but we could destabilize it a hell of a lot more by how we leave.
Obama's decision to stay for another 2 years and leave a force of 50,000 indefinitely will destabilize it a hell of a lot more. Sure on the surface it'll look sweet, but anger and resentment towards the people making deals with us, working closely with us, and profiting from this will explode when we leave. Again, whether that's today, or 50 years from now.
I don't disagree with a single word you've said except for what you think i've said.
Then quit supporting Obama's decision to stay for another 2 years and leave a force of 50,000 indefinitely.
There is the right way and the wrong way to bring all the troops home.
Right, Obama's decision to stay for another 2 years and leave a force of 50,000 indefinitely is guaranteed to cause resentment.
Sorry, I don't have anymore for anyone who doesn't have sensitivity to that. I think you broke yer listening bone.
I think you have selective sensitivity. I've understood your position just fine, but it's pretty hilarious talking about sensitivity etc. coming from someone who claims to be on the left who states
knotkranky wrote: Liberal agenda? Domestically, good. Worldwide? too many enemies ready to test us. Obama is being rightfully shrewd on that. I'm ready to sign up!!! You talkin to me iran!!!
GWB would be proud of both you and Obama. :wink:

knotkranky
Posts: 4336
Joined: Tue Mar 14, 2006 7:08 pm
Location: la

Re: Barack Obama Honeymoon period: How long before you start?

Post by knotkranky » Wed Apr 01, 2009 3:06 am

No MW That Iran bit was a joke. Now I know you're not listening.

I don't support an indefinite force of 50,000.

Exiting that country has the potential of being really nasty for a lot of people and you don't give a shit.

Machinesworking
Posts: 11551
Joined: Wed Jun 23, 2004 9:30 pm
Location: Seattle

Re: Barack Obama Honeymoon period: How long before you start?

Post by Machinesworking » Wed Apr 01, 2009 9:33 am

knotkranky wrote:No MW That Iran bit was a joke. Now I know you're not listening.

I don't support an indefinite force of 50,000.

Exiting that country has the potential of being really nasty for a lot of people and you don't give a shit.
The Iran bit was a shitty joke at best, but it doesn't change the rest of that quote one bit.

Obama supports and indefinite force of roughly 50,000 in Iraq.

It does not matter if we leave now or 50 years from now, our exit will not change the fact that we opened up old wounds there, and created new ones. We cannot fix that by remaining there, we add to the mess. <-- this is the third fucking time I've posted this in various forms, and I'm not listening??? WTF?

Seriously cut the emotional response BS, You want to keep troops there (in some hyper extended transition phase) because you still think we have some sort of moral high road over the people there, that our invading force military is somehow magically turned into stabilizing force military, that somehow after we leave the people who work with us, that we approve of, that we 'stabilize' into power positions, (generally this is called a puppet government, but they were 'elected'), will not have to contend with the extremists, and the righteously violated???
I give a shit, but I'm not lying to myself that my government has anything but it's own private interests in mind. Believe me, I don't like the fact that I see no real way around bloodshed or governmental tyranny when we leave, but history has a way of backing me up on this. You're a nice guy, but you're being hopelessly optimistic in light of overwhelming evidence that in terms of war, Obama is more of the same.

b0unce
Posts: 5379
Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 4:16 pm

Re: Barack Obama Honeymoon period: How long before you start?

Post by b0unce » Wed Apr 01, 2009 1:02 pm

MW, the word you're looking for is 'delusional', and he was that all the way through the presidential campaign. Now, since Obomba was elected, he's just being your archetypical american retard.(KnotKognazent)
spreader of butter

knotkranky
Posts: 4336
Joined: Tue Mar 14, 2006 7:08 pm
Location: la

Re: Barack Obama Honeymoon period: How long before you start?

Post by knotkranky » Wed Apr 01, 2009 5:43 pm

Machinesworking wrote:
knotkranky wrote:No MW That Iran bit was a joke. Now I know you're not listening.

I don't support an indefinite force of 50,000.

Exiting that country has the potential of being really nasty for a lot of people and you don't give a shit.
The Iran bit was a shitty joke at best, but it doesn't change the rest of that quote one bit.

Obama supports and indefinite force of roughly 50,000 in Iraq.

It does not matter if we leave now or 50 years from now, our exit will not change the fact that we opened up old wounds there, and created new ones. We cannot fix that by remaining there, we add to the mess. <-- this is the third fucking time I've posted this in various forms, and I'm not listening??? WTF?

Seriously cut the emotional response BS, You want to keep troops there (in some hyper extended transition phase) because you still think we have some sort of moral high road over the people there, that our invading force military is somehow magically turned into stabilizing force military, that somehow after we leave the people who work with us, that we approve of, that we 'stabilize' into power positions, (generally this is called a puppet government, but they were 'elected'), will not have to contend with the extremists, and the righteously violated???
I give a shit, but I'm not lying to myself that my government has anything but it's own private interests in mind. Believe me, I don't like the fact that I see no real way around bloodshed or governmental tyranny when we leave, but history has a way of backing me up on this. You're a nice guy, but you're being hopelessly optimistic in light of overwhelming evidence that in terms of war, Obama is more of the same.


You're using an awfully simplistic argument to pin me to things i've never said or don't believe in. That's fine.

Contrary to you, I believe there is a way around or a way to minimize bloodshed and governmental tyranny when we leave. I feel responsible for those lives.

Why don't you explain how well Iraq will fare by pulling out all military personal immediately? What are the potential scenarios? I'm ready to be educated.

Machinesworking
Posts: 11551
Joined: Wed Jun 23, 2004 9:30 pm
Location: Seattle

Re: Barack Obama Honeymoon period: How long before you start?

Post by Machinesworking » Thu Apr 02, 2009 5:45 pm

knotkranky wrote: You're using an awfully simplistic argument to pin me to things i've never said or don't believe in. That's fine.
..and you're trying to frame the argument instead of reply to my responses, which is a way of avoiding answering the observations I'm making here. You're also being purposefully stupid, there's nothing simplistic about what I'm saying, or you wouldn't have such a hard time with it. It's rather the opposite problem, you want us staying to be a good thing, and are more or less willfully avoiding looking at this conflict from a historical perspective from what I can tell.
I don't think you aren't getting what I'm saying or aren't aware that history is on my side with this, it's just become a matter of debate now, and you're not willing to admit very simply that in the area of foreign policy, Obama isn't really that different than the republicans, because it's not comfortable to acknowledge that.
Contrary to you, I believe there is a way around or a way to minimize bloodshed and governmental tyranny when we leave. I feel responsible for those lives.
History is on my side here, an occupying military force can not, and will not stabilize a country, if that occupier is the aggressor. If you stop 'debating' for a second and really put some though into it, you'll realize I'm right.
The 'war' was over years ago, what we've been fighting for almost 5 years now is partisan resistance movements.
Why don't you explain how well Iraq will fare by pulling out all military personal immediately? What are the potential scenarios? I'm ready to be educated.
I've said this in numerous ways, but the outlook is not good, whether we leave now or 50 years from now. <---Another point you ignore.

It's vanity on our part to think that as a standing foreign occupying force, we can somehow get the little uneducated, barbaric muslims to realize the awesomeness of our installed with military force political system, that favors naturally the Shiite majority, and puts the Sunni's in jeopardy. Basically there is no way that there won't be conflict there. All we can do is arm the shit out of whomever we want to win and hope that they want to win. This isn't something I think is cool, or like etc. but it's what will happen, regardless of any political or military maneuvering we do, or how long we stay to protect our interests and political allies in Iraq. Some things are beyond the control of our military, and some people value honor and pride over democracy and 'freedom'. We can't force freedom on people with whom we've destroyed their honor and hurt their sense of pride.

ethios4
Posts: 5377
Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2003 6:28 am

Re: Barack Obama Honeymoon period: How long before you start?

Post by ethios4 » Thu Apr 02, 2009 7:50 pm

To me it all boils down to the fact that our presence there is illegitimate, and staying longer does not change that fact.

Incy
Posts: 110
Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2008 2:59 pm
Location: Portland, Maine
Contact:

Re: Barack Obama Honeymoon period: How long before you start?

Post by Incy » Fri Apr 03, 2009 2:20 am

GTFO with all this inane banal. I'd rather take an intellectually curious president that doesn't bypass the constitution, set up secret government, deny prisoners basic human rights, mass fire federal judges, allow media to consolidate, trivialize civil liberties, prosecute common pornography while real criminals rape financial institutions and investors, attempt to peddle our social security entitlements to corporate greed, compromise cia operatives while illegally spying on citizens, engage in costly unprovoked war, refuse to meet with his secretary of state after he was five minutes late, limit government transparency to the extent law will allow, ignore the wishes of congress with signing statements, promote mass xenophobia and capitalize on fear, alienate foriegn allies, burn bridges with foes, and rub religion in your face. Few men could ever fuck up that much. Get some real shit on Obama to complain about already. The right wing wants something real to attack so badly. All they got is a joke on TV that had gone sour. When Obama takes a big piss on the constitution like the last guy did, I'll lose faith in Obama.

knotkranky
Posts: 4336
Joined: Tue Mar 14, 2006 7:08 pm
Location: la

Re: Barack Obama Honeymoon period: How long before you start?

Post by knotkranky » Fri Apr 03, 2009 6:53 am

Machinesworking wrote:
knotkranky wrote: You're using an awfully simplistic argument to pin me to things i've never said or don't believe in. That's fine.
..and you're trying to frame the argument instead of reply to my responses, which is a way of avoiding answering the observations I'm making here. You're also being purposefully stupid, there's nothing simplistic about what I'm saying, or you wouldn't have such a hard time with it. It's rather the opposite problem, you want us staying to be a good thing, and are more or less willfully avoiding looking at this conflict from a historical perspective from what I can tell.
I don't think you aren't getting what I'm saying or aren't aware that history is on my side with this, it's just become a matter of debate now, and you're not willing to admit very simply that in the area of foreign policy, Obama isn't really that different than the republicans, because it's not comfortable to acknowledge that.
Contrary to you, I believe there is a way around or a way to minimize bloodshed and governmental tyranny when we leave. I feel responsible for those lives.
History is on my side here, an occupying military force can not, and will not stabilize a country, if that occupier is the aggressor. If you stop 'debating' for a second and really put some though into it, you'll realize I'm right.
The 'war' was over years ago, what we've been fighting for almost 5 years now is partisan resistance movements.
Why don't you explain how well Iraq will fare by pulling out all military personal immediately? What are the potential scenarios? I'm ready to be educated.
I've said this in numerous ways, but the outlook is not good, whether we leave now or 50 years from now. <---Another point you ignore.

It's vanity on our part to think that as a standing foreign occupying force, we can somehow get the little uneducated, barbaric muslims to realize the awesomeness of our installed with military force political system, that favors naturally the Shiite majority, and puts the Sunni's in jeopardy. Basically there is no way that there won't be conflict there. All we can do is arm the shit out of whomever we want to win and hope that they want to win. This isn't something I think is cool, or like etc. but it's what will happen, regardless of any political or military maneuvering we do, or how long we stay to protect our interests and political allies in Iraq. Some things are beyond the control of our military, and some people value honor and pride over democracy and 'freedom'. We can't force freedom on people with whom we've destroyed their honor and hurt their sense of pride.
Stupid aye. hmm


I'm reading here Obama intends to remove the remaining 50,000 by the end of 2011, sooo what gives dude.
Machinesworking wrote: you're not willing to admit very simply that in the area of foreign policy, Obama isn't really that different than the republicans, because it's not comfortable to acknowledge that.
I would have to agree to it to admit it so you're right.

History is on my side here, an occupying military force can not, and will not stabilize a country, if that occupier is the aggressor. If you stop 'debating' for a second and really put some though into it, you'll realize I'm right.
I appreciate your expertise, but i'll go with Obama instead.

noiserot
Posts: 26
Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2008 8:19 pm

Re: Barack Obama Honeymoon period: How long before you start?

Post by noiserot » Fri Apr 03, 2009 6:57 am

There's no doubt that Bush and his cronies are despicable. Unfortunately, Obama is just there to diffuse the righteous anger that many people feel and manipulate their hope for change. And what "change" he brought, like keeping Bush's secretary of defense Robert Gates in the same role, who by the way, was a CIA thug involved in the Iran-Contra affair.
Incy wrote:Get some real shit on Obama to complain about already. The right wing wants something real to attack so badly. All they got is a joke on TV that had gone sour. When Obama takes a big piss on the constitution like the last guy did, I'll lose faith in Obama.
Why don't you start with these:

Obama's plan for a national mandatory draft:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lhQ_lEiaNT8

Obama Sides With RIAA, Supports $150,000 Fine per Music Track"
http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2009/0 ... s-wit.html

Obama's campaign promises on the war:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4WYTKj8pU5M
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xGur8GlFOAc
Obama to keep 50,000 troops in Iraq and rename "combat troops" to "trainers" and "advisors":
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfhdtLK0aTM
Obama deploys 17,000 US troops to Afghanistan and Pakistan:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7QQjMF796iw
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gtc7wrWA9Vw

b0unce
Posts: 5379
Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 4:16 pm

Re: Barack Obama Honeymoon period: How long before you start?

Post by b0unce » Fri Apr 03, 2009 6:04 pm

noiserot wrote:And what "change" he brought, like keeping Bush's secretary of defense Robert Gates in the same role, who by the way, was a CIA thug involved in the Iran-Contra affair.
Don't forget whore-features Madeline Albright, who's serving as one of the top advisors to Obomba re: national security. Besides being a fully certified spawn of beelzebub, she's the secretary of state who famously said 500,000 dead iraqi kiddies as a result of economic sanctions was 'worth it'. She's also an advisor to Hillary 'I supported the invasions of Afghanistan & Iraq and even voted in favour of the resolution which allowed mr bush to invade iraq, and voted against the amendment which would have ensured mr bush excercised all diplomatic alternatives first' Clinton. who is now Obomba's secretary of state.

Mind boggling, really, how americans are perceiving 'change' through the most shallow & contrived rhetoric - yet the mechanisms remain exactly the same in the most important areas. I guess it takes years of systematic stupifying from birth to get to grips with this doublethink shtick.
spreader of butter

Post Reply