timothyallan wrote:If your lyrics consist of singing ABC's then yes, it would have started when you learnt your ABC's and applied them to your songwriting.
That would be plagiarism
timothyallan wrote:If your lyrics consist of singing ABC's then yes, it would have started when you learnt your ABC's and applied them to your songwriting.
DrXparaMental wrote:Would it be too much to ask for you to respond with something slightly more "in context"? Nothing I have stated touches upon your refute.stringtapper wrote: This is not true. No one is born with an instrument in their hands. Even W.A. Mozart wasn't born with it; Leopold just put a violin in his hand as soon as he could stand. The people who have perfect pitch usually have it because they were intensely immersed in music from an early age, so the equal tempered pitches become familiar entities just like letters of the alphabet.
You got your "ear" from listening and playing. That's work. Anyone can learn to hear. I know this from experience. I teach college freshman ear training, and I know with enough work you can learn to hear. Yes we get some turkeys who can't match pitch, but that's mostly because they don't know how to use their voice.
Now I know you will say that I'm talking about ear training instead of "feel training," but I am talking about that too. Listening and absorbing styles is how you learn "feel." Active listening is work. If you had never listened to the kind of music you play on the bass, you would not have the feel or groove.
Please quote where I stated that "some people are born with instruments in their hands"
Just because you don't understand what I posted is no reason to assume what I am stating is not true. Learn to ask questions. You may just appreciate the experience greatly.
H20nly wrote:So how does this work with lyrics?
Anyone have any formulas for that?
I like the humorous nature of the twist that you imply.H20nly wrote:So if you practice you get better.
OR
If you are "born with" it you practice to make those who aren't feel better.
Does this about sum it up?
I still want to know if this applies to lyrics. And if so does it start when you begin to learn your ABCs or when you actually start writing lyrics?
So can you please define what you think this "natural inclination" is and where it comes from?DrXparaMental wrote:What I have stated is that the majority of those that choose to play an instrument are NOT naturally inclined to do so. I have also stated that some of these individuals can even achieve technical prowess on their instruments of choice. Most of those same people that can and do exercise a few chops, and yet possess little if any real talent, are good for shit in bed. (so to speak) I have stated it before and will attempt to state it again as clearly as is possible. You cannot, by virtue of teaching or practice alone, be a truly great musician. You MUST have the element that is a natural inclination to truly excel.
No matter how much perfume you put on a pig, it's still a pig.
dcease wrote:i even have a metronome in my head. i know for certain that i could never teach anyone else how to do this, or offer advice on how to become a great lyricist. but i can tell you, it doesn't matter if you can sing, or what you vocalize about (some will think you suck, others won't)
Exactly. Its all relative.DrXparaMental wrote:No matter how much perfume you put on a pig, it's still a pig.
No doubt. Same here.timothyallan wrote:I have a lot of musical 'talent' that I sure didn't have 5 years ago. It came from desire, learning and practicing, it's not from something I was born with.
Timothy, me think you better look up the word "talent" in the dictionary. I'm sorry bro, but music and the ego just never seem to part company. Talent is something you are born with, not something you magically get after a certain amount of time. I didn't mean to rob your thread. That's not my way. I simply know when I am right.timothyallan wrote:I have a lot of musical 'talent' that I sure didn't have 5 years ago. It came from desire, learning and practicing, it's not from something I was born with.
I had a hunch that I might get the "If you have to ask you'll never know," type of reply.DrXparaMental wrote:To MR. Stringtapper, I apologize for an improper reply but there is something wrong with your posts when I attempt to reply to them. There is no other person's posts that I having a problem replying to, but when I attempt to reply to your posts the cursor keeps jumping around and doing weird stuff. Maybe your computer is naturally haunted or something.
Seriously dude, if you don't understand or KNOW (I say that because it's a factual scientific understanding, not a theory or hypothesis)that genetic predisposition as as real as your students, I'm sorry bro, I can't help you. People are ASSUREDLY genetically predisposed to musical talent. It's a genetic memory thing my man. Read up, you'll dig it. It's amazing what is stored in the human genetic code.
You are flat out WRONG about natural talent. You are either (a) born with it, or (b) you're not.
that's a dangerous way to go through life.DrXparaMental wrote:I simply know when I am right.
Tone Deft wrote:maybe it's a circular definition, self fulfilling prophecy.
you can't make the call until after the person has demonstrated mastery or suckage. even then, someone can go from suckage to mastery or mastery to suckage.
that's a dangerous way to go through life.DrXparaMental wrote:I simply know when I am right.you've never been married, have you?
Okay, well that's your take and you're welcome to it.DrXparaMental wrote:Timothy, me think you better look up the word "talent" in the dictionary. I'm sorry bro, but music and the ego just never seem to part company. Talent is something you are born with, not something you magically get after a certain amount of time. I didn't mean to rob your thread. That's not my way. I simply know when I am right.timothyallan wrote:I have a lot of musical 'talent' that I sure didn't have 5 years ago. It came from desire, learning and practicing, it's not from something I was born with.
You are flat out WRONG about natural talent. You are either (a) born with it, or (b) you're not.
Precisely! Skills are increased and talent is appreciated. Both grow with good habits and accumulated experience. HOWEVER Tim, one must be born with the talent & aptitude to have it's specific context appreciate or grow, where as skills are developed and increased after your relative talents have been initiated via repetition.timothyallan wrote:Okay, well that's your take and you're welcome to it.DrXparaMental wrote:Timothy, me think you better look up the word "talent" in the dictionary. I'm sorry bro, but music and the ego just never seem to part company. Talent is something you are born with, not something you magically get after a certain amount of time. I didn't mean to rob your thread. That's not my way. I simply know when I am right.timothyallan wrote:I have a lot of musical 'talent' that I sure didn't have 5 years ago. It came from desire, learning and practicing, it's not from something I was born with.
You are flat out WRONG about natural talent. You are either (a) born with it, or (b) you're not.
I put the word in quotes initially as I don't think I was born with talent, but have acquired skill over the years. When I'm teaching, some people comment on how they wish they were 'talented' like me... and I tell them that it just takes practice. Perhaps I should tell them to swap the words and use 'skilled', as you are saying that you can't acquire talent?