creating dry/wet knob for FX that don't have one?
creating dry/wet knob for FX that don't have one?
Is there a simple way to create a dry/wet knob for effects that don't have one built in, possibly with racks? I know i could do this by duplicating a track or with sends and fussing with the levels, but it seems like there should be a way to do it with just one knob.
For instance, using Amplitube, it would be great if it had a dry/wet knob so i could use the effect easily live, on the fly as a distortion or whatever.
For instance, using Amplitube, it would be great if it had a dry/wet knob so i could use the effect easily live, on the fly as a distortion or whatever.
-
logic_user99
- Posts: 1965
- Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2007 3:58 pm
- Location: Nottingham, UK
Re: creating dry/wet knob for FX that don't have one?
Two chains in an FX rack - one chain no FX, one chain with. Set one macro knob to control the volume of each (when one is up, t'other is down)
Macbook | Live 7.0.18 |
Re: creating dry/wet knob for FX that don't have one?
this is exactly what sends are for.
I know you said you don't want to use them, but why?
Why re-invent the wheel? I don't get it....
I know you said you don't want to use them, but why?
Why re-invent the wheel? I don't get it....
Re: creating dry/wet knob for FX that don't have one?
the easy answer: create a rack with two chains. chain 1 = no effect. chain 2 = effect. map each chain's volume to a single macro, and in macro map mode invert the min/max values on one of the chains. the one macro will now turn up one chain as it turns down the other and act as a rough wet/dry. i haven't done this myself, so there may be some crossfade issues: i.e. the volume being much louder at the 50/50 mark or whatnot.
edit: logic_user beat me to it. that's your jam.
edit: logic_user beat me to it. that's your jam.
Re: creating dry/wet knob for FX that don't have one?
cool, that's exactly what i was looking for. without having tried it i'm going to guess that the volume will fluctuate if your just doing it with volume knobs, but i'll start messing around with it and see what i can do.
The reason i don't want to do it with sends is because it would be for live use, and i need one knob I can turn to add the effect.
The reason i don't want to do it with sends is because it would be for live use, and i need one knob I can turn to add the effect.
-
tw1nstates
- Posts: 1127
- Joined: Sat Apr 14, 2007 1:00 pm
Re: creating dry/wet knob for FX that don't have one?
DJDJ wrote:this is exactly what sends are for.
I know you said you don't want to use them, but why?
Why re-invent the wheel? I don't get it....
Hmm, not exactly though, as you will still get the unprocessed sound coming through, unless you have the output set to send only, bu then you will get just the processed sound or no sound.
Please correct me if I have that wrong. ..
I slipped into a daze, whilst I was there I heard the most startling music, it was at once familiar and alien, reassuring and unsettling.
https://soundcloud.com/fearoftherave
https://soundcloud.com/fearoftherave
Re: creating dry/wet knob for FX that don't have one?
using sends for less than 2 tracks..is not so logical..DJDJ wrote:this is exactly what sends are for.
I know you said you don't want to use them, but why?
Why re-invent the wheel? I don't get it....

Re: creating dry/wet knob for FX that don't have one?
i was just about to point you to the covert ops tutorial, i have made some sweet racks thanks to there tutorial on this matter