creating dry/wet knob for FX that don't have one?

Discuss music production with Ableton Live.
Post Reply
kvitamin
Posts: 53
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2009 6:25 pm
Contact:

creating dry/wet knob for FX that don't have one?

Post by kvitamin » Thu May 14, 2009 8:45 pm

Is there a simple way to create a dry/wet knob for effects that don't have one built in, possibly with racks? I know i could do this by duplicating a track or with sends and fussing with the levels, but it seems like there should be a way to do it with just one knob.

For instance, using Amplitube, it would be great if it had a dry/wet knob so i could use the effect easily live, on the fly as a distortion or whatever.

logic_user99
Posts: 1965
Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2007 3:58 pm
Location: Nottingham, UK

Re: creating dry/wet knob for FX that don't have one?

Post by logic_user99 » Thu May 14, 2009 9:07 pm

Two chains in an FX rack - one chain no FX, one chain with. Set one macro knob to control the volume of each (when one is up, t'other is down)
Macbook | Live 7.0.18 |

DJDJ
Posts: 133
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 8:22 pm

Re: creating dry/wet knob for FX that don't have one?

Post by DJDJ » Thu May 14, 2009 9:16 pm

this is exactly what sends are for.

I know you said you don't want to use them, but why?

Why re-invent the wheel? I don't get it....

scientist
Posts: 1338
Joined: Sun Aug 10, 2003 2:06 am
Location: seattle

Re: creating dry/wet knob for FX that don't have one?

Post by scientist » Thu May 14, 2009 9:20 pm

the easy answer: create a rack with two chains. chain 1 = no effect. chain 2 = effect. map each chain's volume to a single macro, and in macro map mode invert the min/max values on one of the chains. the one macro will now turn up one chain as it turns down the other and act as a rough wet/dry. i haven't done this myself, so there may be some crossfade issues: i.e. the volume being much louder at the 50/50 mark or whatnot.

edit: logic_user beat me to it. that's your jam.

hoffman2k
Posts: 14718
Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2004 6:40 pm
Location: Belgium
Contact:

Re: creating dry/wet knob for FX that don't have one?

Post by hoffman2k » Thu May 14, 2009 10:24 pm


kvitamin
Posts: 53
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2009 6:25 pm
Contact:

Re: creating dry/wet knob for FX that don't have one?

Post by kvitamin » Tue May 26, 2009 1:29 pm

cool, that's exactly what i was looking for. without having tried it i'm going to guess that the volume will fluctuate if your just doing it with volume knobs, but i'll start messing around with it and see what i can do.

The reason i don't want to do it with sends is because it would be for live use, and i need one knob I can turn to add the effect.

tw1nstates
Posts: 1127
Joined: Sat Apr 14, 2007 1:00 pm

Re: creating dry/wet knob for FX that don't have one?

Post by tw1nstates » Tue May 26, 2009 4:56 pm

DJDJ wrote:this is exactly what sends are for.

I know you said you don't want to use them, but why?

Why re-invent the wheel? I don't get it....

Hmm, not exactly though, as you will still get the unprocessed sound coming through, unless you have the output set to send only, bu then you will get just the processed sound or no sound.

Please correct me if I have that wrong. ..
I slipped into a daze, whilst I was there I heard the most startling music, it was at once familiar and alien, reassuring and unsettling.
https://soundcloud.com/fearoftherave

3dot...
Posts: 9996
Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2007 11:10 pm

Re: creating dry/wet knob for FX that don't have one?

Post by 3dot... » Tue May 26, 2009 5:54 pm

DJDJ wrote:this is exactly what sends are for.

I know you said you don't want to use them, but why?

Why re-invent the wheel? I don't get it....
using sends for less than 2 tracks..is not so logical..
Image

makehaste
Posts: 69
Joined: Sat Mar 11, 2006 6:07 am
Location: Seattle

Re: creating dry/wet knob for FX that don't have one?

Post by makehaste » Tue May 26, 2009 7:28 pm

i was just about to point you to the covert ops tutorial, i have made some sweet racks thanks to there tutorial on this matter

Post Reply