[OT]2012 trailer

Discuss anything related to audio or music production.
ethios4
Posts: 5377
Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2003 6:28 am

Re: [OT]2012 trailer

Post by ethios4 » Fri Jun 26, 2009 3:07 pm

I have a feeling this movie will be about as a deep as the whole 2012 controversy itself.

ethios4
Posts: 5377
Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2003 6:28 am

Re: [OT]2012 trailer

Post by ethios4 » Fri Jun 26, 2009 4:04 pm

ethios4 wrote:Here's a music video : 'Reptilian Brain'

It's all coming together man! Hyperdimensional ethical aliens! ;)
Oh yea, here's the link.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dNqqAPlgi4k

leehu
Posts: 4
Joined: Sat Aug 30, 2008 11:57 am

Re: [OT]2012 trailer

Post by leehu » Fri Jun 26, 2009 4:57 pm

UKRuss wrote:I for one am excited by this. I totally LOVE disaster movie special effects nonsense! Who gives a toss about the prophecy!

John Cusak? Pfft, he'll never surpass his seminal performance in 'Serendipity'

Cusak, 2012, special FX, craziness FTW!
same here. 2 pints of lager beforehand, 1 large tub of pop-corn, disengage brain = 2 hours of cgi fun :) :)

pulsoc
Posts: 2838
Joined: Fri Apr 29, 2005 7:57 pm
Location: Baltimore
Contact:

Re: [OT]2012 trailer

Post by pulsoc » Fri Jun 26, 2009 5:22 pm

Salty P wrote:How many times can Roland Emmerich make the same film?
Exactly.

beats me
Posts: 23319
Joined: Fri Mar 30, 2007 6:39 pm

Re: [OT]2012 trailer

Post by beats me » Fri Jun 26, 2009 5:31 pm

All you special effects junkies forget that those special effects are typically 15 minutes of a 2+ hour movie. You can forgive the other 1 hour and 45 minutes of complete garbage for that 15 minutes of "Oh wow!"?

Hm, I think that's a good metaphor for being pussy whipped.

Tone Deft
Posts: 24152
Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 5:19 pm

Re: [OT]2012 trailer

Post by Tone Deft » Fri Jun 26, 2009 6:40 pm

definitely a big screen doobie burner, get high and go watch sh1t blow up.


in the year 2012 the world agreed...
there is no god and ancient prophecies were wrong.
...and they lived happily ever after.
:D
In my life
Why do I smile
At people who I'd much rather kick in the eye?
-Moz

hurlingdervish
Posts: 1242
Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 1:06 am
Location: The New England Colonies

Re: [OT]2012 trailer

Post by hurlingdervish » Fri Jun 26, 2009 6:49 pm

Tone Deft wrote:definitely a big screen doobie burner, get high and go watch sh1t blow up.


in the year 2012 the world agreed...
there is no god and ancient prophecies were wrong.
...and they lived happily ever after.
:D
the world lives happily ever after 8) weed is legal 8) healthcare is free 8) 8) gays have rights 8) we accept creationism as bullshit 8)

unless sarah palin gets elected.

and we all know how many rednecks would vote for her

Tone Deft
Posts: 24152
Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 5:19 pm

Re: [OT]2012 trailer

Post by Tone Deft » Fri Jun 26, 2009 6:54 pm

Quentin Tarentino presents... Redneck Blood

an army of African slave zombies rises from the dead to wreak havoc on the south, one inbred at a time.


...and they lived happily ever after.
In my life
Why do I smile
At people who I'd much rather kick in the eye?
-Moz

hurlingdervish
Posts: 1242
Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 1:06 am
Location: The New England Colonies

Re: [OT]2012 trailer

Post by hurlingdervish » Fri Jun 26, 2009 7:02 pm

Tone Deft wrote:Quentin Tarentino presents... Redneck Blood

an army of African slave zombies rises from the dead to wreak havoc on the south, one inbred at a time.


...and they lived happily ever after.
the zombies or the inbreds?

Tone Deft
Posts: 24152
Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 5:19 pm

Re: [OT]2012 trailer

Post by Tone Deft » Fri Jun 26, 2009 7:04 pm

the zombies, they went on to fight for African Slave Zombie voting and marriage rights, decimating the population of the US, which of course made the rest of the world even happier.

I for one welcome our new overlords. no brains, no worries.
Last edited by Tone Deft on Sat Jun 27, 2009 4:34 am, edited 1 time in total.
In my life
Why do I smile
At people who I'd much rather kick in the eye?
-Moz

sporkles
Posts: 3236
Joined: Sun Feb 18, 2007 8:43 pm
Location: Schmocation

Re: [OT]2012 trailer

Post by sporkles » Fri Jun 26, 2009 7:21 pm

To all you haters: get stuffed! You can tell that with this epic doomsday CGI fest, Roland Emerich means business! He's not kidding around anymore!!!

The question is: will we still remember the film in 2013, so that we can be, like "hey, do you remember that epic doomsday CGI fest where the world totally ended in
2012? Wahahahahahaaaaa!"

Johnisfaster
Posts: 7251
Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2005 8:34 am
Contact:

Re: [OT]2012 trailer

Post by Johnisfaster » Sat Jun 27, 2009 4:07 am

I quite liked John Cussack (cusak? cussack? whatever) in Gross Point Blank and War Inc.
It was as if someone shook up a 6 foot can of blood soda and suddenly popped the top.

jsg4z
Posts: 246
Joined: Sun Jun 07, 2009 1:16 am

Re: [OT]2012 trailer

Post by jsg4z » Sat Jun 27, 2009 5:38 am

hurlingdervish wrote:
Tone Deft wrote:definitely a big screen doobie burner, get high and go watch sh1t blow up.


in the year 2012 the world agreed...
there is no god and ancient prophecies were wrong.
...and they lived happily ever after.
:D
the world lives happily ever after 8) weed is legal 8) healthcare is free 8) 8) gays have rights 8) we accept creationism as bullshit 8)

unless sarah palin gets elected.

and we all know how many rednecks would vote for her
oh oh oh, i want that! (boo sarah palin)

aqua_tek
Posts: 2569
Joined: Thu Sep 14, 2006 8:48 pm
Contact:

Re: [OT]2012 trailer

Post by aqua_tek » Sun Jun 28, 2009 12:08 am

I was pretty drunk when I saw this trailer the other day and failed to notice. Is the president black in his flick too?

alex.the.forge
Posts: 1424
Joined: Wed Apr 16, 2008 4:29 am

Re: [OT]2012 trailer

Post by alex.the.forge » Tue Mar 30, 2010 3:10 pm

I just saw this because it was dollar day at the dvd shop

I didn't expect much, but I really wasn't prepared for just how much this film sucked. What an utterly astonishing pile of shite.

Wow, Simply.

The most disturbing thing about it was that Danny Glover and Woody Harrelson have blackened their names with it.

You'd have to really suck outstandingly well to manage to make such a phenomenally bad film. I mean, the sheer spectacle of a budget and CGI technology like that, where you can destroy all the world's major landmarks with tsunamis and earthquakes convincingly practically writes itself for you, so you'd have to be a spectacular bell-end to balls it up so badly.

I mean they didn't so much fail to make a good movie, but completely succeeded in making a preposterously bad one. It was of Ed Wood proportions.

I had to watch it out of sheer morbid fascination, but I want my time back.

Post Reply